Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Stock Analysis 2026

TechnologyTeam Collaboration & DevOps Software
$192.02
as of 2026-09-18
+3.4% (52-week)50D MA $117.11  |  200D MA $108.51

BriMind AI Score

Proprietary
54
Neutral
Price CAGR
19.7%
1Y Return
+2.8%
Analyst Upside
+5.5%
Rev Growth
27.6%

Score based on historical price CAGR, revenue growth, analyst upside, and valuation factors. Updated daily.

AI scores and price targets are for informational and educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions. Full Disclaimer →

About Atlassian Corporation

Atlassian makes the tools that software development teams use to plan, track, and ship code. Its flagship products — Jira (project/issue tracking), Confluence (team wiki and documentation), and Trello (visual project management) — are used by millions of teams globally. Atlassian is migrating its entire customer base from server-hosted products to its Atlassian Cloud platform, a multi-year transition that is increasing recurring revenue visibility and improving margins.

How Atlassian Makes Money

Atlassian earns primarily from cloud subscriptions (Jira Software Cloud, Confluence Cloud, Jira Service Management Cloud). Revenue is expanding as server customers migrate to cloud at higher per-seat pricing. Data Center subscriptions (for customers who self-host on their own infrastructure) are an intermediate option. Atlassian's low-touch, product-led growth (PLG) model means sales are driven by product virality rather than a large direct sales force.

Atlassian Revenue & Profitability Breakdown

This chart shows how Atlassian's revenue flows through to profit. Each row deducts a layer of costs: first the direct cost of making products/services (Cost of Revenue), then operating expenses like marketing and R&D, then taxes. What remains at the bottom is net income — the actual profit shareholders own. High gross and net margins indicate a business with strong pricing power and efficiency.

Revenue
$6.57B
Cost of Revenue
-$943.6M
Gross Profit
$5.63B85.6% margin
Operating Expenses
-$4.82B
Operating Income
$805.8M12.3% margin
Tax & Other
-$859.7M
Net Income
-$-53.8M-0.8% margin
Gross Margin
85.6%
Operating Margin
12.3%
Net Margin
-0.8%
EBITDA Margin
-1.5%

Key Financial Metrics

Atlassian Corporation doesn't carry a meaningful trailing P/E right now, generates $1.66B in free cash flow, runs a debt/equity ratio of 116.48, and converts shareholder equity into profit at a -4.5% return on equity. For context: P/E ratio measures how much you pay for $1 of earnings (lower = cheaper, but fast-growing companies command higher P/E); Free Cash Flow is the cash left after running the business; Debt/Equity shows how leveraged a company is; Return on Equity shows how efficiently it turns shareholder capital into profit.

Market Cap
$48.20B
Enterprise Value
$54.57B
P/E (Forward)
28.24
PEG Ratio
1.98
EV / EBITDA
-713.00
Price / Sales
11.35
Price / Book
41.24
Revenue
$6.57B
Revenue Growth
27.6%
EBITDA
$-76.5M
Gross Margin
85.6%
Operating Margin
12.3%
Net Margin
-0.8%
Return on Equity
-4.5%
Return on Assets
3.0%
Free Cash Flow
$1.66B
Total Cash
$2.97B
Total Debt
$1.23B
Debt / Equity
116.48
Current Ratio
0.78
Quick Ratio
0.74
Beta
1.04
Dividend Yield
None
Payout Ratio
0.0%
Insider Ownership
0.9%
Inst. Ownership
104.4%
Short % Float
7.4%
Book Value / Share
$4.18

Wall Street Analyst Consensus

30 analysts covering Atlassian Corporation currently lean toward a Buy rating, with a mean 12-month price target of $189.61 (-1.3% vs the current price). Analysts set these targets after researching a company's earnings, competitive position, and industry trends — Strong Buy / Buy means the majority expect meaningful upside, while Hold means fair value near the current price rather than a sell signal.

Consensus RatingBuy(30 analysts)
SellStrong Buy
Low Target$215.0012.0%
Mean Target$189.61-1.3% upside
High Target$420.00+118.7%

Intrinsic Value Estimates for TEAM

We use 1 valuation model to estimate TEAM's intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is what a stock is truly worth based on the company's fundamentals, independent of what the market prices it at today. If multiple models agree the stock is undervalued, that convergence is a stronger signal.

Technical Price Signals

TEAM is currently in a golden cross pattern, trading above its 50-day average of $117.11 and above its 200-day average of $108.51. Moving averages smooth out day-to-day volatility to reveal the underlying trend — a Golden Cross (50MA crosses above 200MA) is a classic bullish signal, a Death Cross is bearish, though both are lagging indicators that confirm trends rather than predict them.

Current Price
$192.02
50-Day MA
$117.11
▲ Price above
200-Day MA
$108.51
▲ Price above
Golden Cross Pattern
Price above both MAs — bullish signal

TEAM Investment Case: Bull vs Bear

TEAM's investment case breaks down into 4 bull points and 4 bear points below. The bull case outlines the key reasons the stock could outperform — competitive advantages, growth catalysts, and market tailwinds. The bear case highlights the most significant risks. A strong bull case with manageable bear risks typically makes for a more compelling investment.

Bull Case (Reasons to Buy)

  • Cloud migration is a multi-year revenue tailwind — 85%+ of revenue is still in the process of shifting to higher-priced, higher-margin cloud subscriptions from legacy server licenses.
  • Product-led growth model results in extremely capital-efficient customer acquisition — Jira and Confluence spread virally within organizations as teams adopt them bottom-up.
  • AI integration (Atlassian Intelligence) across Jira and Confluence creates premium upsell opportunities as AI features command higher per-seat pricing.
  • Rovo (Atlassian's enterprise AI agent platform) positions Atlassian to capture AI spending from its 300,000+ existing enterprise customers.

Bear Case (Key Risks)

  • Cloud migration progress has been slower than expected; some large enterprise customers have resisted migration or moved to Data Center instead of Cloud.
  • Competition from Linear, Notion, and Monday.com for new customer acquisition is intensifying as developer tooling markets fragment.
  • Microsoft DevOps (Azure Boards, GitHub Issues) and Jira are the dominant incumbent pair but competition in the space is intensifying.
  • Atlassian's valuation at 40-50x forward earnings requires successful cloud migration completion and AI monetization — risks if either lags expectations.

What to Watch: TEAM Key Metrics

Cloud revenue growth rate
Cloud migration completion percentage
Net revenue retention
AI/Rovo adoption
Free cash flow margin

TEAM Stock — Frequently Asked Questions

Read the full TEAM in-depth report
Seven-method valuation, AI Score, blended price target, and a 5-year Monte Carlo simulation for Atlassian Corporation.

Compare TEAM with Peers

TEAM vs NOWAtlassian vs ServiceNow — Developer Tools vs IT Workflo
MNDY vs TEAMMonday.com vs Atlassian — Work OS vs Developer Collabor
GTLB vs TEAMGitLab vs Atlassian — DevSecOps focus or collaboration
MDB vs TEAMMongoDB vs Atlassian — infrastructure layer or collabor
ZM vs TEAMZoom vs Atlassian — mature cash flow or cloud migration
GTLB vs TEAMGitLab vs Atlassian — DevOps Platform Challenger vs Dev

Unlock the Full TEAM Analysis

Interactive price charts, real-time AI signals, advanced DCF models, portfolio tracking, earnings analysis, and side-by-side peer comparisons. Start your 14-day free trial — no credit card required.

Start Free TrialBrowse All Stocks
Data sources: Financial metrics and market data sourced from company SEC filings, earnings releases, and investor relations disclosures. Price data, analyst consensus targets, and fundamental financials provided by financial market data providers. ETF data sourced from official fund prospectuses and index provider publications. AI scores and price targets are proprietary estimates — see our Methodology and Disclaimer for details.
← Back to Home · Browse All Stock Analysis