BIV vs VGIT Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both intermediate-duration bond ETFs from Vanguard at the same expense ratio (0.04%) but with different credit profiles — BIV blends government and investment-grade corporate bonds for a modest yield pickup over Treasuries, while VGIT holds exclusively U.S. Treasuries for maximum credit safety and flight-to-quality benefits. Investors accepting no credit risk choose VGIT; investors accepting some credit risk for higher yield choose BIV.
BIV vs VGIT is the choice between credit diversification with yield premium (BIV's government/corporate blend earning investment-grade credit spreads over Treasuries in the intermediate maturity range) versus maximum credit safety in pure Treasuries (VGIT's exclusively U.S. government obligations providing flight-to-quality portfolio protection with zero credit risk at the cost of lower yield) — credit exposure for income versus Treasury purity for safety.
BIV holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BIV has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+4.44% vs +3.28% for VGIT).
- →Want modest yield enhancement over pure Treasuries from investment-grade corporate bonds while maintaining investment-grade credit quality limits throughout the intermediate maturity range
- →Are comfortable with the credit cycle exposure that BIV's corporate bond component adds — accepting that corporate credit spreads will widen in recessions (reducing relative performance vs. VGIT temporarily) for a higher expected yield over time
- →Build a custom bond ladder or total bond portfolio by maturity bucket and want a combined government/credit intermediate bond building block
- →Want pure U.S. Treasury intermediate maturity exposure — zero credit risk, zero corporate default risk, maximum flight-to-quality benefits during equity market stress events
- →Prefer separating interest rate risk from credit risk in their fixed income portfolio — using VGIT for rate exposure and a separate credit fund for credit risk allows cleaner factor management
- →Hold VGIT specifically for its strong negative correlation with equity markets during stress — Treasury bonds rally when stocks fall sharply, providing portfolio ballast that corporate bond funds do not provide as reliably
| Metric | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 50.0 | 49.0 |
| Latest close | $76.53 | $58.84 |
| 1M return | +1.43% | +0.98% |
| 6M return | +0.11% | -0.21% |
| 1Y return | +4.44% | +3.28% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.9K (+9.0%) started 2025-06-18 | $10.74K (+7.4%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $12.19K (+21.9%) started 2021-06-18 | $11.77K (+17.7%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $17.24K (+72.4%) started 2016-06-20 | $14.87K (+48.7%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $52.18B | $49.45B |
| Dividend yield | 4.17% | 3.84% |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.26 | 0.16 |
| 52-week change | 4.44% | 3.28% |
| Metric | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +4.44% | +3.28% |
| 6M return | +0.11% | -0.21% |
| 1M return | +1.43% | +0.98% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -0.01 | -0.36 |
| Beta | 0.26 | 0.16 |
| Dividend yield | 4.17% | 3.84% |
| 5Y CAGR | +0.22% | +0.11% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +4.44% | +3.28% |
| CAGR | +4.45% | +3.28% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.01 | -0.36 | |
| Max drawdown | 3.17% | 2.83% | |
| Max daily drop | 0.84% | 0.59% | |
| Max wkly drop | 1.23% | 1.07% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +1.09% | +0.53% |
| CAGR | +0.22% | +0.11% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.64 | -0.79 | |
| Max drawdown | 18.74% | 15.02% | |
| Max daily drop | 1.67% | 1.29% | |
| Max wkly drop | 3.71% | 2.90% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +20.05% | +12.89% |
| CAGR | +1.85% | +1.22% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.46 | -0.71 | |
| Max drawdown | 18.94% | 16.05% | |
| Max daily drop | 2.40% | 1.61% | |
| Max wkly drop | 5.03% | 2.90% |
| Category | BIV | VGIT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund | Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $52.18B | $49.45B |
| Dividend yield | 4.17% | 3.84% |
- →Investment-grade corporate bonds add yield premium over Treasuries — BIV's ~50% corporate bond allocation earns the credit spread (typically 50-100 basis points) over equivalent Treasury maturities; over time, investment-grade corporate bonds have historically provided positive excess returns versus Treasuries after defaults
- →Intermediate maturity provides balanced duration risk — BIV's 5-10 year maturity focus creates moderate duration (~6-7 years) providing meaningful income without the extreme interest rate sensitivity of long-duration bond funds
- →0.04% expense ratio among the lowest in its category — Vanguard's cost leadership produces superior net yields versus higher-cost intermediate bond funds with similar credit exposure
- →Zero credit risk — U.S. Treasuries are the world's safest financial instrument, backed by the U.S. government's full faith and credit and its ability to tax and print currency; VGIT eliminates credit risk entirely
- →Flight-to-quality benefits during equity market stress — Treasuries typically rally (prices rise, yields fall) when equity markets crash; investors flee to safety; VGIT provides portfolio protection when stocks decline sharply
- →Predictable performance driven only by interest rate changes — VGIT's performance is entirely driven by Treasury yield movements without the additional credit spread volatility that affects BIV; cleaner risk factor exposure for investors managing specific risk exposures
- →Corporate credit spread widening in recessions — in economic downturns, corporate bond spreads widen (prices fall) as default risk rises; BIV underperforms VGIT during credit stress events even though all BIV holdings are investment grade
- →Duration risk from 6-7 year effective duration — a 1% rise in interest rates causes approximately 6-7% price decline in BIV; investors must accept interim mark-to-market losses in rising rate environments
- →Lower credit quality than pure Treasury ETFs — BIV's corporate bond component introduces default risk absent in VGIT; investment-grade defaults are rare but not zero (BBB-rated bonds can be downgraded to high-yield, triggering forced selling)
- →Lower yield than BIV — VGIT sacrifices the credit spread (50-100 basis points typically) that BIV earns from investment-grade corporate bonds; over long periods, this yield difference compounds against VGIT versus BIV (though credit risk is also absent)
- →Full U.S. government credit concentration — by definition VGIT is 100% U.S. government exposure; while U.S. Treasury default risk is extremely low, complete concentration in a single sovereign counterparty is worth acknowledging
- →Interest rate risk is still significant — VGIT's 5-6 year duration means meaningful price sensitivity to interest rate changes; it is not a 'safe' investment from a price stability perspective, only from a credit perspective
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.