SPDW vs VEA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SPDW and VEA are nearly interchangeable international developed market ETFs providing broad ex-U.S. equity exposure across Europe, Japan, Canada, and Australia. SPDW has a marginally lower expense ratio (0.03% vs 0.05%), while VEA has dramatically more AUM and liquidity. For most investors, the choice between them will have negligible long-term impact — both are excellent low-cost international core holdings.
SPDW vs VEA is a marginal cost-versus-liquidity comparison for near-identical international developed market exposure — either ETF serves as an effective complement to a U.S. equity allocation, with SPDW having a slight cost edge and VEA having a significant liquidity advantage.
SPDW holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. SPDW has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+22.40% vs +22.28% for VEA).
- prefer the lowest possible expense ratio (0.03%) for international developed market exposure
- value State Street's SPDR Portfolio ETF lineup for ultra-low-cost multi-asset-class portfolio construction
- want marginal cost optimization in an asset class where returns have historically been modest
- are comfortable with lower AUM and trading volume relative to VEA in exchange for expense savings
- prefer the most liquid international developed market ETF with the largest AUM for easy trading in all market conditions
- value Vanguard's ownership structure and long-term investor orientation for core portfolio allocations
- want the standard international developed market vehicle used in popular three-fund and four-fund lazy portfolio strategies
- are comfortable paying 0.05% (vs SPDW's 0.03%) for significantly better liquidity and brand recognition
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 81.0 | 81.0 |
| Latest closei | $50.74 | $71.38 |
| 1M returni | -1.72% | -1.75% |
| 6M returni | +16.34% | +15.95% |
| 1Y returni | +22.40% | +22.28% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.64K (+26.4%) started 2025-09-18 | $12.62K (+26.2%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $19.15K (+91.5%) started 2021-09-20 | $19.32K (+93.2%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $36.35K (+263.5%) started 2016-09-19 | $36.8K (+268.0%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $42.32B | $323.82B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.92% | 2.49% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 16.70 | 16.62 |
| Betai | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| 52-week change | 22.40% | 22.28% |
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +22.40% | +22.28% |
| 6M returni | +16.34% | +15.95% |
| 1M returni | -1.72% | -1.75% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| Betai | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.92% | 2.49% |
| 5Y CAGR | +10.13% | +10.28% |
Over the past year, SPDW and VEA have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 1.00), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +22.40% | +22.28% |
| CAGRi | +22.41% | +22.30% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.27% | 17.47% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.00 | 0.99 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.47 | 1.44 | |
| Max drawdowni | 11.55% | 11.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.00% | 3.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 1.90% | 1.94% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 3.08% | 3.14% | |
| Max daily dropi | 3.71% | 3.72% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 6.96% | 7.06% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +61.89% | +62.98% |
| CAGRi | +10.13% | +10.28% | |
| Volatilityi | 16.81% | 16.88% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.39 | 0.40 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.57 | 0.58 | |
| Max drawdowni | 29.86% | 29.34% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.00% | 3.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.79% | 6.48% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.68% | 9.30% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.34% | 6.33% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 10.59% | 10.51% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +161.40% | +161.89% |
| CAGRi | +10.09% | +10.11% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.13% | 17.21% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.39 | 0.39 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.53 | 0.53 | |
| Max drawdowni | 34.98% | 35.74% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.00% | 3.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.52% | 6.51% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.30% | 9.26% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.19% | 11.18% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.69% | 20.94% |
| Category | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $42.32B | $323.82B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.92% | 2.49% |
- 0.03% expense ratio is one of the cheapest international ETFs available, minimizing cost drag in a historically modest-return asset class
- Broad coverage including small-cap stocks in developed markets provides more complete international exposure than large-cap-only international ETFs
- State Street's brand and operational infrastructure ensure reliable index tracking
- Largest international ETF by AUM ($120B+), providing excellent secondary market liquidity for retail and institutional investors
- 0.05% expense ratio is among the cheapest international ETFs, though SPDW is marginally cheaper at 0.03%
- FTSE index covers 4,000+ developed market companies including small-caps, providing very broad international diversification
- SPDW and VEA are nearly identical in exposure — the primary differentiator is cost, where SPDW has a slight edge but VEA is also extremely cheap
- Developed markets outside the U.S. have generally underperformed U.S. equities for over a decade, reducing the appeal of international allocation overall
- Currency risk from Japanese yen, euro, and pound exposure adds volatility beyond the underlying equity returns
- SPDW's 0.03% expense ratio is 40% cheaper than VEA's 0.05% — small but real over long holding periods in a cost-sensitive asset class
- Developed market equities have significantly underperformed U.S. equities over the past decade, creating performance frustration for broad international allocators
- Currency headwinds from USD strength have periodically reduced the USD-denominated returns for VEA holders
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.