DBC vs PDBC ETF Comparison 2026: Invesco Commodity ETFs: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
DBC and PDBC are both Invesco broad commodity ETFs providing diversified exposure to energy, metals, and agricultural commodity futures. The primary practical difference is tax structure — DBC issues K-1 forms (partnership structure) while PDBC is structured to issue standard 1099 forms, making PDBC generally more convenient for retail investors and compatible with tax-advantaged accounts.
DBC vs PDBC is essentially the same commodity exposure offered in two different tax structures — choose DBC for longer-established track record, or PDBC for K-1-free tax simplicity, depending on your account type and tax situation.
PDBC holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PDBC has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+52.12% vs +51.56% for DBC).
- Want the longest-established broad commodity futures ETF with institutional credibility and track record
- Are comfortable managing K-1 tax forms and hold DBC in taxable accounts where the complexity is manageable
- Want Invesco's optimum yield roll strategy for broad commodity diversification across energy, metals, and agriculture
- Want broad commodity futures exposure without the K-1 tax form complications from DBC's partnership structure
- Are holding commodity exposure in tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k) where partnership K-1s create UBTI complications
- Value tax simplicity and standard 1099 reporting as the primary decision factor when choosing between broadly similar commodity exposures
| Metric | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 76.0 | 82.0 |
| Latest closei | $33.05 | $19.71 |
| 1M returni | +8.43% | +8.30% |
| 6M returni | +14.60% | +14.46% |
| 1Y returni | +51.56% | +52.12% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $15.66K (+56.6%) started 2025-09-17 | $15.8K (+58.0%) started 2025-09-17 |
| 5Y ago | $22.49K (+124.9%) started 2021-09-17 | $44.45K (+344.5%) started 2021-09-17 |
| 10Y ago | $32.38K (+223.8%) started 2016-09-19 | $79.14K (+691.4%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.85% | 0.59% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.8B | $7.29B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.38% | 2.73% |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| 52-week change | 51.56% | 52.12% |
| Metric | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +51.56% | +52.12% |
| 6M returni | +14.60% | +14.46% |
| 1M returni | +8.43% | +8.30% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.92 | 1.94 |
| Betai | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.38% | 2.73% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.24% | +13.79% |
Over the past year, DBC and PDBC have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 1.00), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +51.56% | +52.12% |
| CAGRi | +51.61% | +52.16% | |
| Volatilityi | 20.52% | 20.51% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.92 | 1.94 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.86 | 2.89 | |
| Max drawdowni | 16.54% | 16.55% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.87% | 1.94% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 3.31% | 3.29% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.21% | 5.19% | |
| Max daily dropi | 4.11% | 4.27% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 6.71% | 6.58% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +94.58% | +90.79% |
| CAGRi | +14.24% | +13.79% | |
| Volatilityi | 19.32% | 19.29% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.56 | 0.54 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.77 | 0.74 | |
| Max drawdowni | 27.34% | 27.63% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.87% | 1.94% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 15.55% | 15.98% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.49% | 17.94% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.94% | 7.87% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.40% | 12.70% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +170.91% | +163.25% |
| CAGRi | +10.49% | +10.17% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.94% | 17.90% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.40 | 0.38 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.54 | 0.52 | |
| Max drawdowni | 41.71% | 40.73% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.87% | 1.94% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.51% | 13.88% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 16.46% | 16.84% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.94% | 7.87% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.25% | 13.55% |
| Category | DBC | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.85% | 0.59% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.8B | $7.29B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.38% | 2.73% |
- Diversified commodity exposure across energy, metals, and agricultural commodities provides a broad inflation hedge
- Optimum yield roll strategy attempts to minimize negative roll yield from contango by rolling into the contract with the most favorable forward curve structure
- One of the most established broad commodity ETFs with a long track record for institutional and retail investors
- No K-1 tax form — issues standard 1099 like a regular ETF, greatly simplifying tax filing for retail investors holding commodity exposure
- Broad commodity diversification similar to DBC across energy, metals, and agricultural futures
- Can be held in tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k) without the unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) complications from partnership K-1 structures
- DBC issues K-1 tax forms due to its partnership structure, which creates complexity for retail investors versus standard brokerage 1099 reporting
- Commodity futures ETFs have complex tax treatment and may not be suitable for tax-advantaged accounts
- Commodity futures performance can diverge significantly from spot commodity prices due to roll costs in contango markets
- PDBC may hold commodity exposure through subsidiary structures that add complexity versus direct futures holding in DBC
- Expense ratio may differ slightly from DBC — investors should compare current expense ratios when choosing
- Broad commodity ETF performance depends heavily on the commodity cycle and futures curve dynamics that affect all commodity futures products similarly
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.