SPLG vs SPY ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SPLG and SPY track the identical S&P 500 index and hold the same securities. The only meaningful differences are: expense ratio (SPLG 0.02% vs SPY 0.09%), options market liquidity (SPY dominates), and share price (SPLG ~$60 vs SPY ~$600). For most long-term retail investors, SPLG is the better choice — same index at lower cost. SPY's higher expense ratio is justified only for institutional or options-focused investors needing maximum liquidity.
SPLG vs SPY — two ETFs tracking the same S&P 500 index from the same fund family (State Street), with SPLG providing 0.02% expense ratio for cost-conscious long-term investors and SPY providing 0.09% expense ratio with the world's most liquid equity ETF for institutional and options market participants.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer the lower-cost S&P 500 ETF from State Street at 0.02% expense ratio — identical index exposure to SPY at 0.07% lower annual cost that compounds significantly over decades
- value lower share price (~$60+) for more granular position sizing without requiring fractional shares for small regular investments
- want the same S&P 500 exposure as SPY without paying for institutional-grade options liquidity they don't need
- are comfortable with lower options market liquidity and thinner trading volume vs SPY for buy-and-hold investing
- need the world's most liquid equity ETF options market for covered call strategies, protective puts, collar hedging, or institutional derivative overlays
- make large institutional trades where SPY's narrower bid-ask spreads and deeper liquidity pool reduce transaction costs vs thin alternatives
- want the original S&P 500 ETF with the longest track record and universal recognition in financial market discourse
- are comfortable with the 0.07% higher expense ratio knowing they are paying for institutional-grade liquidity that benefits their specific investment strategy
| Metric | SPLG | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | N/A | N/A |
| AI ranki | N/A | N/A |
| Latest closei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | SPLG | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | N/A |
| Target upsidei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | SPLG | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margini | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SPLG | SPY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A |
| Category | SPLG | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Company | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
| Sector | Broad Market ETF | Broad Market ETF |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | SPLG is State Street's lower-cost S&P 500 ETF, launched as an alternative to SPY for longer-term investors. SPLG tracks the S&P 500 index with a 0.02% expense ratio — matching VOO (Vanguard) and IVV (iShares) on cost, while SPY costs 0.09%. SPLG holds the same 500+ companies as SPY, weighted by market capitalization, including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Tesla, and Berkshire Hathaway. SPLG has a lower share price (~$60+) vs SPY (~$600+), making it more accessible for investors with limited capital or fractional shares. | SPY is the world's largest and most traded ETF by volume — the original S&P 500 ETF launched in 1993. SPY tracks the S&P 500 with 0.09% expense ratio. SPY's size (~$550B in assets) and daily trading volume create the world's most liquid equity ETF — essential for institutional investors executing large trades, running options strategies, or needing immediate market access. SPY's options market is the most liquid equity derivative in the world — used globally for hedging, income generation, and tactical positioning. |
| Investor focus | Investors should evaluate SPLG vs SPY on: expense ratio difference, share price accessibility, and whether institutional-grade options liquidity (SPY) is needed. | SPY is primarily used by institutional investors, options traders, and tactical allocators requiring maximum liquidity. Long-term retail investors are better served by VOO, IVV, or SPLG at lower cost. |
- 0.02% expense ratio matches the cheapest S&P 500 ETFs: SPLG's annual cost is 0.07% less than SPY — over 30 years, this compounds to meaningful savings
- Same S&P 500 index as SPY: SPLG holds identical underlying securities to SPY — same market exposure, same dividend treatment, same index methodology
- Lower share price increases accessibility: SPLG's ~$60+ share price vs SPY's ~$600+ makes fractional-share investing unnecessary for building full-share positions
- Most liquid equity ETF in the world: SPY's $20–50B+ daily trading volume and world's most liquid options market make it irreplaceable for institutional and options-based strategies
- 30+ year track record: SPY is the original S&P 500 ETF with a 1993 inception — the longest track record in index ETF investing
- Institutional standard: S&P 500 exposure via SPY is the default benchmark instrument for portfolio managers, hedge funds, and market makers globally
- Lower options market liquidity than SPY: SPLG's options market is thin — investors who hedge or implement covered call strategies should use SPY instead
- Lower trading volume than SPY: for large institutional trades, SPY's tighter bid-ask spreads and larger liquidity pool provide better execution
- SPLG is less widely known: financial advisors and 401k plan menus may default to SPY — investors may not be offered SPLG as an option
- 0.09% expense ratio is higher than alternatives: over 30 years, SPY's expense ratio costs significantly more than SPLG/VOO/IVV at 0.02–0.03%
- Long-term retail investors are paying more for liquidity they don't need: most individual investors don't need SPY's options market depth — they'd be better served by cheaper alternatives
- Unit investment trust structure vs ETF structure: SPY is a UIT (must reinvest dividends at quarter-end rather than immediately) which can create minor tracking error differences vs open-end ETF alternatives
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on SPLG and SPY. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside SPLG and SPY, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.