HACK vs BUG Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
HACK and BUG both target cybersecurity theme exposure but take different paths to get there — HACK via the Prime Cyber Defense Index, and BUG via the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. The practical differences come down to issuer, cost structure, and the specific index rules each fund follows, since both are pursuing a similar investment outcome.
HACK vs BUG is largely a question of which issuer and index methodology you trust more for cybersecurity theme exposure — the underlying investment case is similar, so cost, liquidity, and tracking precision tend to be the deciding factors.
HACK holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. HACK has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+40.60% vs +40.29% for BUG).
- want the original, broad cybersecurity theme fund
- prefer ETFMG's approach and fund lineup
- value first-mover, longest track record among cybersecurity ETFs
- are comfortable with higher expense ratio than some newer thematic competitors
- want an alternative cybersecurity theme fund competing directly with HACK
- prefer Global X's approach and fund lineup
- value lower expense ratio than the original HACK fund
- are comfortable with newer fund with a shorter track record than HACK
| Metric | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 27.9 | 26.7 |
| Latest closei | $119.63 | $46.98 |
| 1M returni | -4.28% | -1.57% |
| 3M returni | +4.34% | +13.95% |
| 6M returni | +43.92% | +67.97% |
| 1Y returni | +40.60% | +40.29% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.07K (+40.7%) started 2025-11-04 | $14.03K (+40.3%) started 2025-11-04 |
| 5Y ago | $18.21K (+82.1%) started 2021-11-05 | $14.49K (+44.9%) started 2021-11-05 |
| 10Y ago | $48.07K (+380.7%) started 2016-11-07 | $31.51K (+215.1%) started 2019-11-01 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $3.55B | $2.27B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 28.83 | 32.96 |
| Betai | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| 52-week change | 40.60% | 40.29% |
| Metric | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +40.60% | +40.29% |
| 6M returni | +43.92% | +67.97% |
| 3M returni | +4.34% | +13.95% |
| 1M returni | -4.28% | -1.57% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.07 | 0.95 |
| Betai | 0.83 | 0.87 |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| 5Y CAGR | +12.59% | +7.18% |
Over the past year, HACK and BUG have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.96), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +40.60% | +40.29% |
| CAGRi | +40.63% | +40.33% | |
| Volatilityi | 32.66% | 38.81% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.07 | 0.95 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.63 | 1.46 | |
| Max drawdowni | 18.83% | 31.44% | |
| Current drawdowni | 10.40% | 10.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.61% | 10.53% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.08% | 13.49% | |
| Max daily dropi | 5.09% | 5.87% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 10.45% | 12.87% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +80.84% | +41.41% |
| CAGRi | +12.59% | +7.18% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.06% | 30.71% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.41 | 0.23 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.59 | 0.33 | |
| Max drawdowni | 38.68% | 41.66% | |
| Current drawdowni | 10.40% | 10.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.07% | 17.28% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 18.17% | 20.48% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.38% | 6.75% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 15.03% | 15.49% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +363.46% | +204.78% |
| CAGRi | +16.59% | +17.23% | |
| Volatilityi | 24.15% | 30.38% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.57 | 0.53 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.81 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdowni | 38.68% | 41.66% | |
| Current drawdowni | 10.40% | 10.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 9.30% | 13.87% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 13.65% | 17.81% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.57% | 8.66% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.83% | 19.76% |
| Category | HACK | BUG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | Global X Cybersecurity ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $3.55B | $2.27B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.05% | 0.02% |
- First-mover, longest track record among cybersecurity ETFs
- Diversified across network security, identity, and cloud-security firms
- Structural tailwind from rising global cyberattack frequency
- Lower expense ratio than the original HACK fund
- Similar structural tailwind from rising cybersecurity spending
- Diversified across network, cloud, and endpoint security firms
- Higher expense ratio than some newer thematic competitors
- Concentrated industry exposure adds volatility versus broad tech funds
- Thematic performance can lag during broader tech sell-offs
- Newer fund with a shorter track record than HACK
- Overlaps significantly with HACK's core holdings
- Thematic concentration risk applies equally to both funds
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on HACK and BUG. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside HACK and BUG, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.