GTLB vs ASAN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
GTLB (GitLab) serves software development teams with a comprehensive DevSecOps platform competing primarily against GitHub, while ASAN (Asana) serves broader business teams with work and project management software competing against Monday.com and Microsoft — they serve different end users and workflows but both address team productivity software.
GTLB vs ASAN compares enterprise team productivity software for different audiences: GitLab's developer-focused DevSecOps platform versus Asana's business team work management software.
GTLB holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. GTLB has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+28.17% vs -26.26%), though ASAN has the better forward P/E setup (19.29x vs 48.53x for GTLB). GTLB leads on both revenue growth (23.10%) and operating margin (-5.96%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for ASAN (+14.90%) than for GTLB (+8.10%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want DevSecOps platform exposure competing directly in the software development toolchain
- Believe GitLab's single-platform approach will attract developers frustrated with integrating multiple tools
- See GitLab Duo AI coding assistance as a competitive differentiator against GitHub in enterprise accounts
- Want enterprise work management software exposure beyond the developer/IT team market
- Value Asana's brand recognition and UX reputation in project and portfolio management
- Believe improving profitability trajectory and AI features can reaccelerate Asana's growth
| Metric | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 25.9 | 23.9 |
| AI ranki | #3576 | #3537 |
| Latest closei | $55.94 | $10.42 |
| 1M returni | +13.93% | +9.68% |
| 3M returni | +76.16% | +36.39% |
| 6M returni | +156.25% | +78.12% |
| 1Y returni | +28.17% | -26.26% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.59K (+15.9%) started 2025-10-16 | $7.37K (-26.3%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $5.3K (-47.0%) started 2021-10-18 | $897.5 (-91.0%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $5.38K (-46.2%) started 2021-10-14 | $3.62K (-63.8%) started 2020-09-30 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $8.37B | $2.01B |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 48.53 | 19.29 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 6.27 | 2.33 |
| Analyst targeti | $53.57 | $10.08 |
| Target upsidei | +8.10% | +14.90% |
| Metric | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 23.10% | 9.90% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +31.14% | +23.79% |
| Operating margini | -5.96% | -19.05% |
| Profit margini | -2.49% | -18.63% |
| ROIC proxyi | -2.96% | -93.80% |
| Return on equityi | -2.96% | -93.80% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | 247.62 |
| Current ratioi | 2.55 | 0.92 |
| Quick ratioi | 2.43 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, GTLB and ASAN have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.62), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +15.89% | -26.26% |
| CAGRi | +15.92% | -26.27% | |
| Volatilityi | 59.54% | 65.95% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.47 | -0.21 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.69 | -0.31 | |
| Max drawdowni | 61.95% | 63.84% | |
| Current drawdowni | 0.12% | 30.99% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 31.27% | 37.82% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 36.43% | 42.32% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.77% | 12.69% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.68% | 18.73% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -46.99% | -91.02% |
| CAGRi | -11.93% | -38.26% | |
| Volatilityi | 73.06% | 79.31% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.12 | -0.27 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.19 | -0.39 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.16% | 96.17% | |
| Current drawdowni | 57.26% | 92.70% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 61.66% | 84.74% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 62.98% | 86.09% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.86% | 26.40% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.24% | 39.53% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -46.15% | -63.82% |
| CAGRi | -11.64% | -15.49% | |
| Volatilityi | 73.25% | 76.54% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.13 | 0.10 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.20 | 0.15 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.16% | 96.17% | |
| Current drawdowni | 57.26% | 92.70% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 61.58% | 71.95% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 62.93% | 78.52% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.86% | 26.40% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.24% | 39.53% |
| Category | GTLB | ASAN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | GitLab Inc. | Asana, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Core business | GitLab provides an end-to-end DevSecOps platform covering the entire software development lifecycle — source code management (Git), CI/CD pipelines, security scanning, artifact registry, and deployment management in a single application. | Asana provides work and project management software helping teams coordinate, track, and manage work across organizations, with growing AI automation features for task assignment and workflow management. |
| Investor focus | Investors track GitLab's annual recurring revenue growth, net dollar retention among existing customers, and AI feature adoption through GitLab Duo, as the company positions itself as the developer platform for the AI-assisted development era. | Investors track Asana's enterprise customer growth (accounts over $100K annual spend), net retention trends, and progress toward sustained profitability as growth has moderated. |
- Comprehensive single-platform DevSecOps approach reduces the complexity of integrating multiple point tools
- AI coding assistant (GitLab Duo) provides GitHub Copilot competition within a comprehensive development platform
- Open source community version drives enterprise sales through bottom-up developer adoption
- Well-known brand in team work management with intuitive product design and broad market awareness
- Enterprise customer segment provides higher-value, stickier revenue than individual or small-team plans
- AI features add automation capabilities that reduce manual task management overhead
- Faces dominant competition from GitHub (owned by Microsoft) and GitHub Copilot in the core developer tooling market
- Path to GAAP profitability has required careful balance between growth investment and operating leverage
- The AI-assisted coding market is changing developer workflows rapidly, creating both opportunity and uncertainty
- Faces intense competition from Monday.com, Smartsheet, and Microsoft's bundled Project and Teams tools
- Revenue growth has moderated from earlier hyper-growth rates
- Path to profitability has required multiple rounds of workforce rationalization
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on GTLB and ASAN. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside GTLB and ASAN, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.