GTLB vs FROG Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
GitLab and JFrog both serve the DevOps and software development market but with different scope — GitLab provides a unified end-to-end development platform from code to deployment, while JFrog focuses specifically on artifact management, binary distribution, and software supply chain security. They can be complementary rather than directly competitive in many enterprise environments.
GTLB vs FROG compares two DevOps infrastructure companies with different scope — GitLab's broad DevSecOps lifecycle platform against JFrog's specialized software artifact and supply chain management platform.
FROG holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. FROG has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+85.40% vs +12.62%), though GTLB has the better forward P/E setup (48.53x vs 79.01x for FROG). On fundamentals, FROG is growing revenue faster (28.70%), while GTLB maintains the higher operating margin (-5.96%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for FROG (+23.80%) than for GTLB (+8.10%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want the DevSecOps platform consolidation story — betting that enterprises will prefer a single integrated platform over many point tools
- Value GitLab's strong net revenue retention as the platform expands within existing customer organizations
- Believe GitLab can take significant market share from GitHub and best-of-breed DevOps toolchains in enterprise accounts
- Want exposure to the software supply chain management segment where JFrog's Artifactory has a dominant established market position
- See software supply chain security as a secular growth area following high-profile attacks on development tool infrastructure
- Value JFrog's more specialized, defensible niche versus GitLab's broader competition against GitHub and enterprise DevOps suites
| Metric | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 25.8 | 38.0 |
| AI ranki | #2776 | #1385 |
| Latest closei | $52.37 | $86.34 |
| 1M returni | +1.69% | -11.77% |
| 3M returni | +44.83% | +2.15% |
| 6M returni | +115.60% | +60.45% |
| 1Y returni | +12.62% | +85.40% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.43K (+14.3%) started 2025-11-05 | $18.54K (+85.4%) started 2025-11-04 |
| 5Y ago | $4.24K (-57.6%) started 2021-11-05 | $22.13K (+121.3%) started 2021-11-05 |
| 10Y ago | $5.04K (-49.6%) started 2021-10-14 | $13.33K (+33.3%) started 2020-09-16 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $8.37B | $11.15B |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 48.53 | 79.01 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 6.27 | 17.51 |
| Analyst targeti | $53.57 | $112.00 |
| Target upsidei | +8.10% | +23.80% |
| Metric | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 23.10% | 28.70% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +31.14% | +33.80% |
| Operating margini | -5.96% | -7.12% |
| Profit margini | -2.49% | -7.35% |
| ROIC proxyi | -2.96% | -4.93% |
| Return on equityi | -2.96% | -4.93% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | 1.52 |
| Current ratioi | 2.55 | 2.13 |
| Quick ratioi | 2.43 | 2.02 |
Over the past year, GTLB and FROG have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.49), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +14.27% | +85.40% |
| CAGRi | +14.30% | +85.48% | |
| Volatilityi | 59.37% | 76.07% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.45 | 1.13 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.65 | 1.81 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.26% | 49.62% | |
| Current drawdowni | 9.66% | 17.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 26.51% | 14.99% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 32.20% | 19.72% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.77% | 24.94% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.68% | 32.76% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -57.61% | +121.27% |
| CAGRi | -15.78% | +17.23% | |
| Volatilityi | 72.91% | 57.99% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.06 | 0.49 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.09 | 0.74 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.16% | 56.59% | |
| Current drawdowni | 59.99% | 17.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 62.27% | 27.05% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 63.29% | 30.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.86% | 27.52% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.24% | 32.76% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -49.59% | +33.26% |
| CAGRi | -12.66% | +4.79% | |
| Volatilityi | 73.13% | 58.06% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.11 | 0.29 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.17 | 0.44 | |
| Max drawdowni | 85.16% | 80.38% | |
| Current drawdowni | 59.99% | 17.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 61.55% | 53.50% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 62.89% | 57.28% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.86% | 27.52% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.24% | 32.76% |
| Category | GTLB | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| Company | GitLab Inc. | JFrog Ltd. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Core business | GitLab provides a single, unified DevSecOps platform covering the entire software development lifecycle — source code management, CI/CD, security scanning, container registry, and project management — competing with the combination of GitHub + many standalone tools. | JFrog provides the Software Supply Chain Platform — a suite of tools for managing binary artifacts, container images, packages, and ML models throughout the software delivery process, with Artifactory (universal package repository) as its flagship product. |
| Investor focus | Investors track GitLab's annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth, net revenue retention rate above 120%, the transition from self-managed to SaaS deployments, and the ultimate platform premium GitLab can charge for consolidating the entire DevOps toolchain. | Investors track JFrog's ARR growth, the expansion of its software supply chain platform beyond Artifactory into security (Xray) and ML model management (Artifactory ML), and net retention as the platform expands. |
- Single platform for the entire DevSecOps lifecycle eliminates tool sprawl and integration complexity that plagues multi-vendor DevOps environments
- Strong land-and-expand model — organizations adopt GitLab for source control, then expand into CI/CD, security, and compliance modules over time
- Open-core model with a free community tier drives adoption at the developer level before organizations upgrade to paid tiers
- Artifactory is the market-leading universal binary repository manager — used by the majority of large enterprises globally for managing software packages and container images
- Software supply chain security is a growing priority following SolarWinds and other supply chain attacks — JFrog Xray addresses security scanning of artifacts
- Universal repository supporting all major package formats (npm, Maven, Docker, PyPI, NuGet, etc.) makes Artifactory a single hub for all software package management
- GitHub (owned by Microsoft) is the dominant source code hosting platform — competing with GitHub's network effects and Microsoft's enterprise distribution is challenging
- GitLab's large market opportunity is accompanied by intense competition not just from GitHub but from AWS, Google Cloud, and many DevOps tool vendors
- Profitability timeline requires GitLab to convert high R&D investment into revenue growth and eventually operating leverage
- Artifactory's market penetration is already very high among large enterprises, potentially limiting the total addressable market expansion for the core product
- JFrog's growth has moderated as the post-COVID DevOps spending normalization reduced urgency to add new tooling
- Competition from native cloud provider registries (AWS ECR, Google Artifact Registry) could pressure JFrog's pricing in cloud-native environments
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on GTLB and FROG. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside GTLB and FROG, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.