How do OKTA and CYBR differ fundamentally?

Okta manages standard user access — single sign-on, MFA, and lifecycle management for employees and customers logging into everyday applications. CyberArk manages privileged access — the admin credentials, root accounts, API keys, and machine identities that provide administrative control and that attackers prioritize in breaches. They operate at different security tiers of the identity stack.

What metrics matter most when comparing OKTA and CYBR?

For Okta, track total ARR growth (split by Workforce and CIAM), net dollar retention rate, operating margin improvement, and new logo acquisition pace relative to pre-breach levels. For CyberArk, the critical metrics are total ARR growth, SaaS ARR as a percentage of total (quality transition), Venafi machine identity ARR, and large enterprise PAM new logo wins in regulated verticals.

Which is better for long-term investors — OKTA or CYBR?

Long-term, CyberArk's privileged access moat is arguably more entrenched — compliance requirements in finance and government mandate PAM solutions that are embedded in security architecture for decades. Okta's broader but more competitive IAM market faces ongoing pressure from Microsoft Entra. Both are important security categories; CyberArk offers more defensible long-term competitive positioning while Okta offers greater total addressable market scale if it successfully holds off Microsoft.

Data as of: September 20, 2026

brimindinvest.com / compare / okta-vs-cybrLIVE

OKTA

Okta, Inc. · Technology

$182.37

+29.15% this month

VERSUS

COMPARE

CYBR

CyberArk Software Ltd. · Technology

N/A

N/A this month

Comparison scoreboard

MIXED SETUP

AI Scorei

OKTA 58.8

CYBR N/A

1Y Returni

OKTA +94.84%

CYBR N/A

Fwd P/Ei

OKTA 37.97

CYBR N/A

Target Up.i

OKTA +8.53%

CYBR N/A

Op. Margini

OKTA 13.29%

CYBR N/A

Metrics last refreshed: 9/20/2026

Quick take

OKTA vs CYBR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

ShareX LinkedIn Reddit Facebook WhatsApp

Okta and CyberArk are complementary identity security platforms addressing different identity problems. Okta manages everyday employee and customer authentication access (SSO, MFA, lifecycle); CyberArk governs the most dangerous privileged credentials that enable administrative and root-level system access. Enterprises typically deploy both rather than choosing one, but as investments they represent different market segments, customer personas, and competitive dynamics.

OKTA vs CYBR is a choice between cloud IAM for standard user access (Okta) and privileged access governance for the most sensitive credentials (CyberArk) — Okta addresses every user's daily authentication, while CyberArk addresses the specific credentials that are most catastrophically dangerous if compromised.

Live analysis · updated 9/20/2026

OKTA and CYBR are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly.

Normalized 1Y performance

OKTA

CYBR

Not enough data to chart yet.

Recent returns

OKTA

CYBR

Analyst price targets & sentiment

Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.

OKTA · 42 analysts

Price target range

analyst low$75.00
analyst mean$180.41
current price$182.37

+8.5% upside to analyst mean

CYBR

Price target data unavailable

N/A

Who should consider this stock?

OKTA may suit investors who:

prefer a cloud IAM specialist serving both workforce and customer identity at scale with neutral multi-cloud positioning
value Auth0's developer identity platform as a differentiated CIAM vehicle with consumer-facing application adoption
want recovery upside from the 2022 breach trust damage as Okta rebuilds customer confidence and ARR growth reaccelerates
are comfortable with Microsoft Entra bundling competition and improving but still moderate profitability

CYBR may suit investors who:

prefer the dominant privileged access management specialist with near-monopoly in regulated enterprise environments
value machine identity management expansion via Venafi as a large and rapidly growing new TAM
want compliance-driven recurring revenue from financial services, government, and critical infrastructure PAM requirements
are comfortable with SaaS revenue transition headwinds while subscription ARR replaces perpetual license recognition

Performance & AI score

Performance & AI score
Metric	OKTA	CYBR
AI scorei	58.8	N/A
AI ranki	#193	N/A
Latest closei	$182.37	N/A
1M returni	+29.15%	N/A
6M returni	+125.82%	N/A
1Y returni	+94.84%	N/A

$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)

How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?

$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
Period	OKTA	CYBR
1Y ago	$19.48K (+94.8%) started 2025-09-18	N/A
5Y ago	$7.22K (-27.8%) started 2021-09-20	N/A
10Y ago	$77.57K (+675.7%) started 2017-04-07	N/A

Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.

Valuation & upside potential

Valuation & upside potential
Metric	OKTA	CYBR
Market capi	$29.06B	N/A
Trailing P/Ei	100.14	N/A
Forward P/Ei	37.97	N/A
Price/Salesi	8.60	15.16
EV/Revenuei	8.73	N/A
Analyst targeti	$180.41	N/A
Target upsidei	+8.53%	N/A

Growth, profitability & risk

Growth, profitability & risk
Metric	OKTA	CYBR
Revenue growthi	10.60%	N/A
Earnings growthi	75.70%	N/A
EPS growthi	+75.70%	N/A
FCF margini	+33.77%	N/A
Operating margini	13.29%	N/A
Profit margini	9.63%	N/A
ROIC proxyi	4.31%	N/A
Return on equityi	4.31%	N/A
Dividend yieldi	N/A	N/A
Payout ratioi	0.00%	N/A
Dividend growth streaki	N/A	N/A
Betai	0.76	-0.10
Debt/equityi	0.76	N/A
Current ratioi	1.52	N/A
Quick ratioi	1.38	N/A

Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot

OKTA max drawdowni33.70%

CYBR max drawdowniN/A

OKTA max wkly dropi21.52%

CYBR max wkly dropiN/A

5Y risk snapshot

OKTA max drawdowni83.22%

CYBR max drawdowniN/A

OKTA max wkly dropi38.52%

CYBR max wkly dropiN/A

10Y risk snapshot

OKTA max drawdowni84.57%

CYBR max drawdowniN/A

OKTA max wkly dropi38.52%

CYBR max wkly dropiN/A

Performance metrics by period

Performance metrics by period
Period	Metric	OKTA	CYBR
1Y	Growthi	+94.84%	N/A
	CAGRi	+94.93%	N/A
	Volatilityi	65.56%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	1.26	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	2.42	N/A
	Max drawdowni	33.70%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	4.24%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	10.08%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	12.43%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	10.89%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	21.52%	N/A
5Y	Growthi	-27.82%	N/A
	CAGRi	-6.32%	N/A
	Volatilityi	59.78%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	0.11	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	0.17	N/A
	Max drawdowni	83.22%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	32.02%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	61.59%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	63.89%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	33.70%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	38.52%	N/A
10Y	Growthi	+675.71%	N/A
	CAGRi	+24.21%	N/A
	Volatilityi	54.77%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	0.59	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	0.87	N/A
	Max drawdowni	84.57%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	37.50%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	38.59%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	49.09%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	33.70%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	38.52%	N/A

AI Prediction Signali

Members only

Next 5 trading days

OKTA

+2.8%BUY

CYBR

+1.1%HOLD

Next 30 trading days

OKTA

+6.4%BUY

CYBR

+3.2%HOLD

Start Free Trial Log in

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required

Business comparison

Business comparison
Category	OKTA	CYBR
Company	Okta, Inc.	CyberArk Software Ltd.
Sector	Technology	Technology
Industry	Software - Infrastructure	N/A
Core business	Okta provides cloud identity management — SSO, MFA, lifecycle management, and CIAM — for workforce (employees logging into applications) and customer identity (consumer-facing login for apps). Its neutral, multi-cloud identity platform serves enterprises that want independence from Microsoft's identity ecosystem. Auth0 (acquired 2021) serves developer teams building authentication into consumer-facing products. Okta competes primarily with Microsoft Entra and internally developed auth systems.	CyberArk specializes in privileged access management (PAM) — securing the highly privileged credentials (admin accounts, root access, API keys, service accounts) that attackers most commonly target to move laterally within a breached environment. Its platform covers PAM for humans, machine identity management (Venafi acquisition), secrets management for DevOps, and endpoint privilege security. CyberArk operates at the most sensitive layer of identity security — the 'crown jewel' credentials that if compromised enable full organizational breach.
Investor focus	Investors track ARR growth across Workforce Identity and Customer Identity, net dollar retention rate recovery from the 2022 trust damage, AI identity security features, and the path to sustained profitability above 20% operating margins.	Investors track ARR growth, SaaS transition progress (shifting from perpetual licenses to recurring subscription), machine identity expansion via Venafi, and platform expansion into broader identity security beyond traditional PAM.

OKTA strengths

Best-in-class cloud IAM platform neutral to all cloud vendors — enterprises with multi-cloud or AWS-first environments prefer Okta over Microsoft Entra
Auth0 is the default developer identity platform for consumer-facing application authentication, with deep adoption across startup and enterprise developer ecosystems
Broad integration library (7,000+ application integrations) creates switching costs from connection infrastructure built around Okta's SAML/OIDC integrations

CYBR strengths

Near-monopoly in privileged access management at large regulated enterprises with compliance-driven deployment requirements
Machine identity management (Venafi) addresses the fastest-growing identity attack surface — cloud workload API keys, certificates, and secrets
CyberArk is embedded in breach remediation plans at most large financial, government, and critical infrastructure organizations

Risks to watch — OKTA

Microsoft Entra bundling within Microsoft 365 creates a free alternative that is capturing mid-market IAM deals
2022 Lapsus$ breach damaged enterprise customer trust and slowed new logo acquisition — still recovering
CyberArk and CrowdStrike Identity both expand into access management adjacent to Okta's core SSO/MFA market

Risks to watch — CYBR

SaaS transition temporarily compresses revenue as perpetual license recognition is replaced by ratable subscription revenue
PAM market is mature in large enterprise — growth requires expanding into machine identity and smaller organizations
Okta's new privileged access features and CrowdStrike's identity module create competitive pressure at the edges of CyberArk's platform

Frequently asked questions

Both are quality identity security investments serving different but complementary functions. CyberArk's near-monopoly in privileged access management creates a more defensible moat with compliance-driven renewal stability. Okta offers broader market coverage and recovery upside from the 2022 trust damage. For stability and moat depth, CyberArk; for higher growth recovery potential and broader identity market exposure, Okta. Investors who want comprehensive identity security exposure often hold both.

Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Start Free Trial Read Investing Guides

Related comparisons