S vs PANW Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks both offer AI-powered security platforms, but at very different scales and with different platform strategies. SentinelOne is a focused EDR and data lake company growing toward profitability; Palo Alto is a broad AI security platform spanning network, cloud, and SecOps with platformization as its primary growth engine. Palo Alto is significantly larger and more mature as a business.
S vs PANW is a high-growth AI-native EDR specialist (SentinelOne) versus the broadest AI security platform company deploying platformization to consolidate enterprise security spending (Palo Alto) — Palo Alto's scale and platform breadth contrast sharply with SentinelOne's focused endpoint strength and on-device AI differentiation.
S and PANW are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. PANW has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+42.43% vs -14.71%), though S trades at the lower forward P/E (30.37x vs 67.93x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for S (+27.54%) than for PANW (+10.98%).
- →prefer an AI-native EDR specialist with on-device AI inference and Singularity Data Lake as a SIEM-alternative growth vector
- →value higher ARR growth rates from a smaller base as SentinelOne displaces legacy AV and gains share from larger platforms
- →want a pure-play AI endpoint security position at potentially lower valuation than Palo Alto's diversified platform
- →are comfortable with negative GAAP profitability and Palo Alto's platformization pricing pressure on standalone EDR
- →prefer the broadest AI security platform with network, cloud, and SecOps coverage enabling enterprise vendor consolidation
- →value XSIAM's AI-powered SIEM replacement as one of the most commercially deployed SOC analytics platforms
- →want a larger, more financially mature security holding with growing free cash flow and platformization deal momentum
- →are comfortable with premium valuation and platformization revenue timing impacts on near-term reported metrics
| Metric | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 23.4 | 61.5 |
| AI rank | #3589 | #137 |
| Latest close | $15.02 | $287.78 |
| 1M return | -14.95% | +19.84% |
| 6M return | +3.73% | +56.88% |
| 1Y return | -14.71% | +42.43% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.53K (-14.7%) started 2025-06-18 | $14.4K (+44.0%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $3.53K (-64.7%) started 2021-06-30 | $46.55K (+365.5%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $3.53K (-64.7%) started 2021-06-30 | $134.73K (+1247.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.15B | $227.89B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | 243.15 |
| Forward P/E | 30.37 | 67.93 |
| Price/Sales | 4.91 | 15.00 |
| EV/Revenue | 4.29 | 21.39 |
| Analyst target | $19.16 | $310.32 |
| Target upside | +27.54% | +10.98% |
| Metric | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 20.80% | 31.10% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | 60.50% |
| EPS growth | N/A | +60.50% |
| FCF margin | +25.59% | +33.75% |
| Operating margin | N/A | -2.46% |
| Profit margin | -30.39% | 7.95% |
| ROIC proxy | -21.36% | 4.83% |
| Return on equity | -21.36% | 4.83% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | N/A |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.94 |
| Debt/equity | N/A | 7.70 |
| Current ratio | 1.44 | 0.86 |
| Quick ratio | 1.25 | 0.73 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -14.71% | +44.05% |
| CAGR | -14.72% | +44.12% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.19 | 1.02 | |
| Max drawdown | 39.64% | 36.01% | |
| Max daily drop | 14.44% | 7.42% | |
| Max wkly drop | 14.26% | 16.38% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -64.66% | +365.49% |
| CAGR | -18.90% | +36.08% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.08 | 0.84 | |
| Max drawdown | 84.35% | 36.01% | |
| Max daily drop | 35.14% | 28.44% | |
| Max wkly drop | 40.12% | 28.86% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -64.66% | +1247.28% |
| CAGR | -18.90% | +29.72% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.08 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdown | 84.35% | 47.98% | |
| Max daily drop | 35.14% | 28.44% | |
| Max wkly drop | 40.12% | 28.86% |
| Category | S | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company | SentinelOne, Inc. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | N/A | Software - Infrastructure |
| Core business | SentinelOne provides AI-powered endpoint and cloud security through the Singularity platform, with on-device AI inference models that detect and respond to threats autonomously. Its Singularity Data Lake positions SentinelOne as a security analytics platform competing with SIEM vendors. As the pure-play AI-native endpoint security challenger, SentinelOne has grown ARR rapidly by winning customers from legacy AV vendors, CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto's Cortex XDR product. | Palo Alto Networks' AI platform covers network security (next-gen firewall, SASE), cloud security (Prisma Cloud CNAPP), and security operations (Cortex XDR, XSIAM SIEM-alternative). Its platformization strategy — bundling multiple modules into large consolidated deals — is accelerating both ARR growth within existing accounts and competitive wins against point-product security vendors. XSIAM competes directly with SentinelOne's data lake in the SOC analytics market. |
| Investor focus | Investors track ARR growth rate, net dollar retention, data lake ARR, and the timeline to GAAP profitability as SentinelOne scales toward breakeven. | Investors focus on next-generation security ARR, platformization deal count, XSIAM ARR, and free cash flow margin as platformization concessions normalize over time. |
- →On-device AI inference provides faster response than cloud-dependent detection models in latency-sensitive environments
- →Singularity Data Lake is a growing SIEM-alternative revenue stream capturing security telemetry analytics spend
- →Lower pricing relative to Palo Alto and CrowdStrike makes SentinelOne competitive for cost-sensitive enterprise security decisions
- →Broadest AI security platform spanning network, cloud, and security operations — no pure-play competitor has equivalent breadth
- →XSIAM AI-powered SIEM replacement is one of the most differentiated security products deployed at large enterprise scale
- →Platformization consolidates enterprise security vendor count, creating large cross-sell within existing firewall customer base
- →Palo Alto's platformization strategy bundles EDR (Cortex XDR) with network, cloud, and SIEM at attractive price points that compress SentinelOne's standalone pricing
- →Path to profitability requires significant margin expansion from current negative operating margins
- →CrowdStrike and Palo Alto both have larger threat intelligence networks and platform breadth advantages
- →Platformization deals include revenue deferrals and free product concessions that temporarily suppress reported growth and billings
- →Premium valuation requires consistent ARR acceleration — any miss relative to expectations creates significant multiple compression
- →CrowdStrike and SentinelOne compete directly with Cortex XDR in EDR, and Zscaler competes in SASE
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.