CRWD vs S: CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
CrowdStrike is the established endpoint security leader with a broad multi-module platform and proven profitability, while SentinelOne is a faster-growing AI-native challenger emphasizing autonomous response and Purple AI. CrowdStrike has scale and margins; SentinelOne has growth rate and valuation upside from a smaller base.
Use this CRWD vs S comparison to evaluate the established leader versus the growth challenger in AI-native cybersecurity. CrowdStrike offers proven execution and platform breadth; SentinelOne offers faster growth and AI-first differentiation at a lower market cap.
CRWD holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. CRWD has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+111.73% vs +23.03%), though S has the better forward P/E setup (42.15x vs 131.85x for CRWD). CRWD leads on both revenue growth (25.80%) and operating margin (-2.26%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for S (+22.69%) than for CRWD (+4.20%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Prefer the market-leading cybersecurity platform with proven profitability and scale
- Value CrowdStrike's broad module ecosystem (endpoint, cloud, identity, SIEM) and high retention rates
- Want cybersecurity exposure with strong free cash flow generation and operating leverage
- Are comfortable paying a premium for the category leader with the deepest enterprise relationships
- Prefer a higher-growth cybersecurity stock with more upside potential from a smaller base
- Believe autonomous AI-driven security (no human triage required) is a meaningful differentiator
- Want to bet on the challenger taking share from the incumbent in a large and growing market
- Are comfortable accepting near-term operating losses for faster revenue growth and AI innovation
| Metric | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 62.8 | 25.8 |
| AI ranki | #103 | #2611 |
| Latest closei | $252.13 | $22.38 |
| 1M returni | +33.28% | +9.12% |
| 6M returni | +172.88% | +77.90% |
| 1Y returni | +111.73% | +23.03% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $21.32K (+113.2%) started 2025-09-25 | $12.34K (+23.4%) started 2025-09-25 |
| 5Y ago | $39.81K (+298.1%) started 2021-09-27 | $3.92K (-60.8%) started 2021-09-27 |
| 10Y ago | $173.88K (+1638.8%) started 2019-06-12 | $5.27K (-47.3%) started 2021-06-30 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $223.63B | $6.85B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 5460.00 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 131.85 | 42.15 |
| Price/Salesi | 42.86 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 40.67 | 5.82 |
| Analyst targeti | $227.58 | $24.15 |
| Target upsidei | +4.20% | +22.69% |
| Metric | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 25.80% | 20.60% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | +36.98% | +27.06% |
| Operating margini | -2.26% | -21.57% |
| Profit margini | 0.83% | -30.95% |
| ROIC proxyi | 1.46% | -23.01% |
| Return on equityi | 1.46% | -23.01% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.23 | 0.75 |
| Debt/equityi | 15.96 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 1.57 | 1.45 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.37 | 1.27 |
Over the past year, CRWD and S have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.69), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +113.18% | +23.37% |
| CAGRi | +113.41% | +23.41% | |
| Volatilityi | 54.81% | 52.88% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.57 | 0.58 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.62 | 0.83 | |
| Max drawdowni | 37.18% | 34.21% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.95% | 7.14% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 11.92% | 13.74% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.60% | 16.47% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.85% | 14.44% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.46% | 13.04% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +298.09% | -60.81% |
| CAGRi | +31.86% | -17.10% | |
| Volatilityi | 437.40% | 63.03% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.14 | -0.05 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 4.33 | -0.07 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.94% | 84.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.91% | 70.67% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 47.93% | 69.32% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 52.05% | 71.13% | |
| Max daily dropi | 74.75% | 35.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 74.83% | 40.12% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +1638.83% | -47.34% |
| CAGRi | +47.96% | -11.53% | |
| Volatilityi | 363.88% | 63.58% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.01 | 0.06 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 3.74 | 0.08 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.94% | 84.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.91% | 70.67% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 38.61% | 66.69% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 45.33% | 69.54% | |
| Max daily dropi | 74.75% | 35.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 74.83% | 40.12% |
| Category | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Company | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | SentinelOne, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Core business | Cloud-native cybersecurity platform offering AI-powered endpoint detection and response (EDR), extended detection and response (XDR), cloud security, identity protection, and threat intelligence via the Falcon platform. | AI-native cybersecurity platform offering autonomous endpoint protection, cloud workload security, and identity threat detection via the Singularity platform with AI-driven automated response. |
| Investor focus | Module adoption rates, net revenue retention, Falcon platform expansion into cloud and identity security, profitability scaling, and competitive positioning. | Revenue growth acceleration, path to profitability, AI differentiation (Purple AI), large enterprise customer wins, and competitive share gains vs CrowdStrike. |
- Market-leading Falcon platform with the deepest module ecosystem in cloud-native endpoint security
- High net revenue retention driven by customers adopting additional modules (cloud, identity, SIEM)
- Proven profitability with expanding operating margins and strong free cash flow generation
- Autonomous AI-driven endpoint protection with real-time response capabilities — no human analyst required for initial triage
- Purple AI generative AI assistant helps security analysts investigate and respond to threats faster
- Smaller and growing faster than CrowdStrike with opportunity to take share in the endpoint market
- July 2024 outage incident — reputational recovery and potential customer trust headwinds
- Premium valuation requires sustained high growth in an increasingly competitive cybersecurity market
- Platform consolidation trend could face pushback from customers preferring best-of-breed point solutions
- Not yet consistently profitable — operating losses remain a concern for risk-averse investors
- Smaller scale means less enterprise credibility and fewer modules compared to CrowdStrike's Falcon ecosystem
- Competitive pressure from CrowdStrike, Microsoft, and Palo Alto in endpoint and cloud security
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on CRWD and S. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside CRWD and S, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.