Data as of:
LIVE
OUST
Ouster, Inc. · Autonomous Technology
$35.05
-12.51% this month
VERSUS
COMPARE
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc. · Autonomous Technology
$1.66
-6.21% this month
Comparison scoreboard
OUST LEADS 3/5AI Scorei
OUST ✓24.9
MVIS 23.7
1Y Returni
OUST ✓+0.95%
MVIS -91.15%
Fwd P/Ei
OUST -278.64
MVIS N/A
Target Up.i
OUST +70.54%
MVIS N/A
Op. Margini
OUST ✓-46.58%
MVIS -1491.58%
Metrics last refreshed: 9/19/2026
Quick take
OUST vs MVIS Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
OUST and MVIS are both LiDAR companies targeting autonomous vehicle sensing but at different stages. Ouster (merged with Velodyne) has $100M+ revenue from industrial and infrastructure applications with the largest independent LiDAR revenue base. MicroVision is an earlier-stage automotive LiDAR pure-play with MAVIN technology in OEM evaluation but no production revenue. Both are pre-profitability; Ouster has more commercial substance; MicroVision is the higher-risk speculation on automotive OEM design win.
OUST vs MVIS — Ouster (the largest independent LiDAR company from the Velodyne merger with digital CMOS architecture and $100M+ industrial/infrastructure revenue) versus MicroVision (the early-stage automotive LiDAR pure-play with MAVIN long-range performance in OEM evaluation seeking the design win that would validate its commercial future).
Live analysis · updated 9/19/2026
OUST holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. OUST has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+0.95% vs -91.15% for MVIS). On fundamentals, MVIS is growing revenue faster (850.30%), while OUST maintains the higher operating margin (-46.58%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split.
Normalized 1Y performance
OUST
MVIS
Recent returns
OUST
MVIS
Analyst price targets & sentiment
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
OUST
Price target range
analyst mean$59.40
current price$35.05
+70.5% upside to analyst mean
MVIS
Price target data unavailable
N/A
Who should consider this stock?
OUST may suit investors who:
- prefer LiDAR exposure with actual commercial revenue from industrial robotics, smart infrastructure, and agriculture applications while automotive adoption develops
- believe the Velodyne merger created meaningful scale advantages — larger combined R&D, customer base, and manufacturing capacity than either company had independently
- want the largest independent LiDAR company with the most commercial substance in a challenging market where survival requires more than automotive speculation
- are comfortable with continued operating losses, LiDAR commoditization from Chinese competitors, and automotive adoption timeline uncertainty
MVIS may suit investors who:
- seek high-risk, high-reward automotive LiDAR pure-play speculation — a major OEM design win announcement could cause dramatic stock re-rating from a low market cap base
- believe MicroVision's MAVIN long-range LiDAR performance claims will prove compelling in OEM evaluations against competing LiDAR systems
- want exposure to potential acquisition premium if a Tier 1 automotive supplier or technology company acquires MicroVision's LiDAR IP and engineering team
- are comfortable with pre-production revenue, severe cash burn creating survivability risk, and the possibility MicroVision fails to win OEM commitments before financial distress forces outcomes
Performance & AI score
| Metric | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 24.9 | 23.7 |
| AI ranki | #3046 | #3616 |
| Latest closei | $35.05 | $1.66 |
| 1M returni | -12.51% | -6.21% |
| 6M returni | +74.81% | -83.48% |
| 1Y returni | +0.95% | -91.15% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.1K (+1.0%) started 2025-09-18 | $885.33 (-91.1%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $4.64K (-53.6%) started 2021-09-20 | $93.39 (-99.1%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $3.61K (-63.9%) started 2020-10-09 | $737.78 (-92.6%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $2.51B | $50.78M |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | -278.64 | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 17.68 |
| EV/Revenuei | 10.51 | 20.10 |
| Analyst targeti | $59.40 | N/A |
| Target upsidei | +70.54% | N/A |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 55.90% | 850.30% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | -28.00% | -778.60% |
| Operating margini | -46.58% | -1491.58% |
| Profit margini | -26.02% | 0.00% |
| ROIC proxyi | -18.01% | -233.74% |
| Return on equityi | -18.01% | -233.74% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 3.27 | 1.17 |
| Debt/equityi | 4.42 | 220.43 |
| Current ratioi | 4.16 | 0.68 |
| Quick ratioi | 3.53 | 0.56 |
Correlation
Over the past year, OUST and MVIS have moved weakly in the same direction (correlation of 0.36), based on daily returns.
1Y
0.36
-1.0+1.0
5Y
0.39
-1.0+1.0
10Y
0.36
-1.0+1.0
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
OUST max drawdowni55.15%
MVIS max drawdowni92.87%
OUST max wkly dropi30.57%
MVIS max wkly dropi61.94%
5Y risk snapshot
OUST max drawdowni95.80%
MVIS max drawdowni99.20%
OUST max wkly dropi41.34%
MVIS max wkly dropi61.94%
10Y risk snapshot
OUST max drawdowni98.01%
MVIS max drawdowni99.61%
OUST max wkly dropi41.34%
MVIS max wkly dropi62.12%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +0.95% | -91.15% |
| CAGRi | +0.95% | -91.16% | |
| Volatilityi | 105.78% | 110.10% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.49 | -1.65 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.75 | -2.05 | |
| Max drawdowni | 55.15% | 92.87% | |
| Current drawdowni | 43.94% | 92.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 30.53% | 51.86% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 33.95% | 57.58% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.96% | 40.58% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 30.57% | 61.94% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -53.64% | -99.07% |
| CAGRi | -14.27% | -60.78% | |
| Volatilityi | 99.62% | 94.12% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.28 | -0.57 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.46 | -0.80 | |
| Max drawdowni | 95.80% | 99.20% | |
| Current drawdowni | 54.54% | 99.13% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 74.30% | 81.02% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 77.30% | 82.61% | |
| Max daily dropi | 27.67% | 40.58% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 41.34% | 61.94% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -63.87% | -92.62% |
| CAGRi | -15.75% | -22.95% | |
| Volatilityi | 97.01% | 117.23% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.25 | 0.27 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.40 | 0.47 | |
| Max drawdowni | 98.01% | 99.61% | |
| Current drawdowni | 78.43% | 99.58% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 77.88% | 70.42% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 81.99% | 75.58% | |
| Max daily dropi | 27.67% | 53.45% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 41.34% | 62.12% |
Business comparison
| Category | OUST | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Ouster, Inc. | MicroVision, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Autonomous Technology |
| Industry | Electronic Components | Scientific & Technical Instruments |
| Core business | Ouster is a digital LiDAR company providing 3D sensing solutions for industrial robotics, smart infrastructure, and autonomous vehicles. Ouster merged with Velodyne in 2023, creating the largest pure-play LiDAR company by revenue. Ouster's digital LiDAR approach uses a different CMOS-based semiconductor architecture that is theoretically more scalable for cost reduction than analog LiDAR. Ouster serves robotics, mapping, agriculture, ports, mining, and emerging automotive customers. Revenue is $100M+ annually with continued losses. | MicroVision is a technology company that transitioned from laser beam scanning (LBS) display technology to automotive LiDAR sensing. MicroVision's MAVIN long-range LiDAR sensor targets automotive OEM applications requiring 200m+ detection range for highway autonomous driving. MicroVision has been developing automotive-grade LiDAR for years and has conducted OEM testing, but has not secured major volume production contracts. Revenue remains minimal — MicroVision is an early-stage automotive LiDAR company burning cash while pursuing OEM design wins. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Ouster's revenue growth, gross margin improvement, path to profitability, and whether digital LiDAR achieves the cost and performance inflection needed for mass-market automotive adoption. | Investors watch MicroVision's MAVIN LiDAR OEM demo evaluations, potential design win announcements, and strategic interest from automotive OEMs or Tier 1 suppliers. |
OUST strengths
- Merged scale from Velodyne combination: the Ouster-Velodyne merger created the largest independent LiDAR company — more resources for R&D, manufacturing scale, and customer base than either company alone
- Digital CMOS LiDAR cost reduction path: Ouster's CMOS-based architecture is designed to leverage semiconductor manufacturing cost curves — theoretically enabling dramatic LiDAR cost reduction as volume scales
- Industrial and smart infrastructure revenue today: Ouster's non-automotive revenue (robotics, infrastructure, agriculture) provides current commercial momentum while automotive adoption develops
MVIS strengths
- Long-range MAVIN LiDAR performance claims: MicroVision's MAVIN LiDAR system has demonstrated long-range performance in OEM evaluations — technical capability claims suggest competitive automotive performance specification
- Potential for strategic partnership or acquisition: MicroVision's automotive LiDAR IP and technology could attract acquisition interest from Tier 1 automotive suppliers (Bosch, Continental) or technology companies entering automotive sensing
- Lower market cap creates higher upside potential: at a smaller market cap than Ouster, a single major OEM design win could represent a much larger percentage gain for MicroVision shareholders
Risks to watch — OUST
- Continued operating losses: Ouster has not achieved profitability — the cash burn timeline creates financing risk if LiDAR adoption in automotive is slower than projected
- LiDAR technology commoditization: Chinese LiDAR manufacturers (Hesai, Innoviz) are producing competitively priced units threatening margins across the LiDAR industry
- Automotive adoption timeline elongation: automotive LiDAR adoption has been repeatedly pushed out — OEM production volume decisions directly impact Ouster's revenue trajectory
Risks to watch — MVIS
- No production revenue or committed OEM contracts: MicroVision has demonstrated technology but lacks committed production volume — OEM selection processes are multi-year with no guarantee of outcome
- Severe cash burn with minimal revenue: MicroVision burns cash with very limited revenue — financial survival depends on capital raises or a strategic partner/acquirer materializing before cash is exhausted
- Automotive LiDAR competition is intensifying: Luminar, Ouster/Velodyne, Cepton (acquired by Magna), and international competitors all compete for the same OEM design wins MicroVision needs to survive
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons