TSLA vs Ford: Tesla vs Ford Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Tesla is a technology-oriented EV, AI, and energy company that commands a premium multiple reflecting its autonomy and software optionality; Ford is a legacy automaker generating most of its value from ICE trucks while investing in EV transition. The comparison is between a high-multiple growth and AI optionality play and a low-multiple, high-yield value stock.
Use this TSLA vs Ford comparison to decide between EV disruption upside and legacy auto value. Tesla's valuation prices in a future of autonomous revenue and energy storage dominance; Ford's valuation prices in little beyond its existing ICE franchise. The better choice depends entirely on how much optionality and risk premium an investor is willing to pay.
F holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. F leads on both 1-year return (+46.20%) and forward P/E (8.11x vs 156.11x for TSLA), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, TSLA is growing revenue faster (15.80%), while F maintains the higher operating margin (5.74%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for TSLA (+7.40%) than for F (-3.36%).
- →Believe Tesla's FSD and robotaxi (Cybercab) will become a significant revenue source over time
- →Want EV market leadership, Supercharger network, and energy storage exposure in a single holding
- →Are comfortable with a high valuation that prices in long-duration technology and AI optionality
- →View Tesla as a technology platform company rather than purely a car manufacturer
- →Want high free cash flow yield from the dominant US commercial and truck franchise
- →Value Ford Pro's commercial services and software revenue as a durable high-margin business
- →Prefer a dividend-paying auto stock at a low P/E multiple with meaningful current income
- →Are comfortable with EV transition risk being contained in a separately tracked Model e segment
| Metric | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 72.7 | 40.8 |
| AI rank | #38 | #1046 |
| Latest close | $408.95 | $15.00 |
| 1M return | -4.53% | +21.75% |
| 6M return | -10.12% | +15.12% |
| 1Y return | +38.56% | +46.20% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $13.25K (+32.5%) started 2025-06-09 | $14.51K (+45.1%) started 2025-06-09 |
| 5Y ago | $20.49K (+104.9%) started 2021-06-09 | $16.47K (+64.7%) started 2021-06-09 |
| 10Y ago | $267.45K (+2574.5%) started 2016-06-09 | $33.5K (+235.0%) started 2016-06-09 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.47T | $59.37B |
| Trailing P/E | 358.72 | 11.79 |
| Forward P/E | 156.11 | 8.11 |
| Price/Sales | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 14.71 | 1.04 |
| Analyst target | $419.94 | $14.40 |
| Target upside | +7.40% | -3.36% |
| Metric | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 15.80% | 6.40% |
| Earnings growth | 8.30% | 430.80% |
| EPS growth | +8.30% | +430.80% |
| FCF margin | +5.37% | -1.18% |
| Operating margin | 4.20% | 5.74% |
| Profit margin | 3.95% | -3.22% |
| ROIC proxy | 4.90% | -14.81% |
| Return on equity | 4.90% | -14.81% |
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.03% |
| Beta | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Debt/equity | 18.74 | 425.54 |
| Current ratio | 2.04 | 1.09 |
| Quick ratio | 1.43 | 0.88 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +32.53% | +45.07% |
| CAGR | +32.68% | +45.29% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 1.07 | |
| Max drawdown | 29.93% | 22.31% | |
| Max daily drop | 8.20% | 7.46% | |
| Max wkly drop | 11.68% | 14.56% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +104.89% | +24.58% |
| CAGR | +15.43% | +4.50% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.46 | 0.20 | |
| Max drawdown | 73.63% | 56.51% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.43% | 18.36% | |
| Max wkly drop | 27.20% | 23.30% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +2574.51% | +82.74% |
| CAGR | +38.92% | +6.22% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.78 | 0.23 | |
| Max drawdown | 73.63% | 64.77% | |
| Max daily drop | 21.06% | 18.36% | |
| Max wkly drop | 43.05% | 23.73% |
| Category | TSLA | F |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tesla, Inc. | Ford Motor Company |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Electric vehicle manufacturer, energy storage provider, and AI/autonomy company. Produces Model 3, Model Y, Model S, Model X, Cybertruck, and Semi. Energy segment includes Powerwall and Megapack. Also developing Full Self-Driving (FSD) and the Optimus humanoid robot. | Legacy automaker organised around Ford Blue (ICE), Ford Model e (EV), and Ford Pro (commercial). F-Series trucks are the top-selling vehicle in the US. Model e produces the F-150 Lightning and Mustang Mach-E EVs. |
| Investor focus | FSD software revenue and autonomy timeline, Cybercab robotaxi launch, energy storage growth, margin recovery, and volume ramp of next-generation affordable vehicles. | Ford Pro commercial vehicle margin strength, Model e EV loss reduction, F-Series volume, and free cash flow generation. |
- →Global EV market leader with the most advanced battery technology, charging network (Supercharger), and FSD software
- →Vertical integration from battery cells to software gives Tesla structural cost and technology advantages
- →Energy storage (Megapack) is a fast-growing, high-margin business independent of auto sales
- →F-Series trucks are the best-selling vehicle in America — a cash-generating franchise with deep brand loyalty
- →Ford Pro is generating high margins from commercial vehicles and growing software and services revenue
- →Transparent EV segment reporting (Model e) allows investors to clearly track ICE profitability vs EV investment
- →Vehicle margins have compressed significantly from aggressive price cuts to maintain volume in a competitive market
- →FSD and Cybercab autonomous commercialisation timeline risk — regulatory and technical hurdles remain significant
- →Brand perception headwinds from political associations affecting demand in key markets
- →Model e EV segment continues generating losses — Ford must reduce EV costs to reach profitability
- →Slower EV market growth means the transition timeline is extended, requiring ICE to fund EVs longer
- →UAW labour cost increase from 2023 contract raises cost-per-vehicle across ICE and EV production
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.