ABBV vs JNJ: AbbVie vs Johnson & Johnson Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AbbVie is a focused pharmaceutical company executing on a clear post-Humira transition with Skyrizi and Rinvoq, plus the Allergan aesthetics franchise; Johnson & Johnson is a diversified healthcare company spanning innovative pharmaceuticals and a large MedTech business. AbbVie offers a higher dividend yield and a clearer near-term growth narrative; JNJ offers more business diversification and MedTech exposure.
Use this ABBV vs JNJ comparison to choose between a high-yield focused pharma compounder and a diversified healthcare quality franchise. AbbVie's Skyrizi/Rinvoq transition is the clearest near-term driver; JNJ's value lies in the combination of its pharma pipeline and MedTech robotic surgery growth.
ABBV holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. JNJ has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+36.73% vs +24.91%), though ABBV has the better forward P/E setup (15.79x vs 21.78x for JNJ). ABBV leads on both revenue growth (10.20%) and operating margin (40.03%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for ABBV (+7.85%) than for JNJ (+1.66%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want a high-dividend-yield pharmaceutical compounder with a clear post-Humira growth transition
- Value Skyrizi and Rinvoq as proven blockbusters continuing to grow faster than Humira declines
- Like the Botox/Allergan franchise as a durable aesthetics and therapeutics revenue stream
- Prefer a more focused pharmaceutical holding without the MedTech complexity of JNJ
- Want diversified healthcare exposure spanning both innovative pharmaceuticals and MedTech devices
- Value Darzalex's oncology growth and Ottava robotic surgery as distinct long-term catalysts
- Prefer a lower-yield but more durable Dividend King with 60+ consecutive years of dividend growth
- Seek a more defensive healthcare holding with two business segments that partially offset each other cyclically
| Metric | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 62.1 | 49.9 |
| AI ranki | #181 | #339 |
| Latest closei | $285.64 | $263.81 |
| 1M returni | +7.76% | -1.99% |
| 3M returni | +10.13% | +0.16% |
| 6M returni | +43.75% | +15.96% |
| 1Y returni | +24.91% | +36.73% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.51K (+25.1%) started 2025-10-23 | $13.71K (+37.1%) started 2025-10-23 |
| 5Y ago | $34.62K (+246.2%) started 2021-10-25 | $19.79K (+97.9%) started 2021-10-25 |
| 10Y ago | $103.56K (+935.6%) started 2016-10-24 | $38.13K (+281.3%) started 2016-10-24 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $454.36B | $645.95B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 72.43 | 31.06 |
| Forward P/Ei | 15.79 | 21.78 |
| Price/Salesi | 5.85 | 4.18 |
| EV/Revenuei | 8.06 | 6.88 |
| Analyst targeti | $277.31 | $272.50 |
| Target upsidei | +7.85% | +1.66% |
| Metric | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 10.20% | 6.60% |
| Earnings growthi | 290.40% | -0.90% |
| EPS growthi | +290.40% | -0.90% |
| FCF margini | +26.20% | +17.24% |
| Operating margini | 40.03% | 29.19% |
| Profit margini | 9.80% | 21.48% |
| ROIC proxyi | 6225.00% | 25.74% |
| Return on equityi | 6225.00% | 25.74% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.69% | 2.00% |
| Payout ratioi | 190.40% | 80.12% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Debt/equityi | 4789.60 | 57.71 |
| Current ratioi | 0.81 | 1.09 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.49 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, ABBV and JNJ have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.51), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +25.14% | +37.07% |
| CAGRi | +25.18% | +37.13% | |
| Volatilityi | 25.81% | 20.73% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.83 | 1.41 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.25 | 2.14 | |
| Max drawdowni | 16.46% | 10.96% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.19% | 5.25% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 5.12% | 3.52% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 6.62% | 4.61% | |
| Max daily dropi | 5.20% | 5.73% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 8.49% | 6.99% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +200.51% | +77.96% |
| CAGRi | +24.64% | +12.23% | |
| Volatilityi | 23.45% | 17.96% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.87 | 0.48 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.22 | 0.71 | |
| Max drawdowni | 21.92% | 18.41% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.19% | 5.25% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.01% | 7.10% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.97% | 8.62% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.57% | 7.59% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 17.30% | 9.18% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +571.27% | +193.36% |
| CAGRi | +20.98% | +11.37% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.04% | 18.99% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.69 | 0.43 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.96 | 0.60 | |
| Max drawdowni | 45.09% | 27.37% | |
| Current drawdowni | 1.19% | 5.25% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 11.47% | 6.44% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 15.55% | 7.99% | |
| Max daily dropi | 16.25% | 10.04% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 19.39% | 13.25% |
| Category | ABBV | JNJ |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AbbVie Inc. | Johnson & Johnson |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Core business | Large-cap pharmaceutical company. Core immunology drugs include Skyrizi (risankizumab) and Rinvoq (upadacitinib), which are replacing Humira as the revenue drivers. Also markets Botox (aesthetics and therapeutics), Vraylar (psychiatry), and Venclexta (oncology) through the Allergan acquisition. | Diversified healthcare company split into Innovative Medicine (pharmaceuticals) and MedTech (surgical robotics, orthopedics, cardiovascular, vision). Kenvue (consumer health) was spun off in 2023. Core drugs include Darzalex, Tremfya, Erleada, and Carvykti. |
| Investor focus | Skyrizi and Rinvoq revenue trajectory replacing Humira erosion, Allergan aesthetics recovery, psychiatry pipeline, and dividend sustainability. | Innovative Medicine pipeline productivity, MedTech robotic surgery growth, Darzalex and Tremfya as post-Stelara growth anchors, talc litigation resolution, and dividend growth. |
- Skyrizi and Rinvoq are both growing rapidly and are expected to generate more combined revenue than Humira at peak
- Allergan acquisition adds Botox franchise — a durable, aesthetics-and-neurology revenue stream
- One of the highest dividend yields in large-cap pharmaceuticals, with a track record of consistent growth
- Two distinct high-quality businesses in one holding — Innovative Medicine and MedTech both operate at scale
- Darzalex (multiple myeloma) is one of the fastest-growing large-cap pharma drugs and has multiple new indication opportunities
- MedTech Ottava robotic surgery system represents a significant new growth platform if commercially validated
- Humira biosimilar erosion is ongoing — revenue from the world's former best-selling drug continues to decline
- Skyrizi and Rinvoq must sustain strong growth to fully offset Humira losses — execution is critical
- High debt from the Allergan acquisition, though being progressively paid down from strong cash flows
- Talc litigation overhang — ongoing legal proceedings related to baby powder asbestos claims create headline risk
- Stelara (psoriasis/IBD) facing biosimilar competition — this blockbuster drug is in revenue decline
- MedTech competitive dynamics in robotic surgery (Intuitive Surgical's dominant position is hard to dislodge)
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on ABBV and JNJ. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside ABBV and JNJ, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.