COP vs XOM Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil are both major US oil companies with significant Permian Basin exposure, but COP is a pure-play E&P while XOM is a fully integrated major with refining, chemicals, and downstream operations. XOM's integration provides earnings diversification across oil price cycles; COP's pure-play model provides more direct oil price leverage and allows more concentrated capital return to shareholders.
COP vs XOM is a choice between the focused pure-play E&P with best-in-class variable return mechanism (ConocoPhillips) and the integrated major with diversified earnings streams, the most reliable dividend in energy, and Pioneer-driven Permian dominance (ExxonMobil).
COP holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. XOM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+43.54% vs +41.02%), though COP has the better forward P/E setup (13.68x vs 14.72x for XOM). On fundamentals, XOM is growing revenue faster (44.10%), while COP maintains the higher operating margin (31.51%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for COP (+11.49%) than for XOM (+8.28%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer pure-play E&P oil price exposure without downstream refining margin noise from chemicals and fuel retail
- value VROC variable return mechanism that directly passes oil cycle upside to shareholders
- want lower total enterprise value with more concentrated capital allocation entirely to E&P production growth
- are comfortable with pure-play model's higher earnings volatility at oil price extremes vs integrated model buffer
- prefer the largest integrated oil major with diversified downstream, chemicals, and upstream earnings across oil cycles
- value XOM's 40+ year consecutive dividend increase record and superior dividend reliability vs COP's variable return model
- want the Permian Basin's dominant integrated operator with Pioneer's inventory as a multi-decade production growth engine
- are comfortable with larger enterprise value, higher multiple, and Pioneer integration complexity
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 56.9 | 53.0 |
| AI ranki | #237 | #361 |
| Latest closei | $131.83 | $163.54 |
| 1M returni | +0.96% | -0.75% |
| 6M returni | +4.61% | +3.40% |
| 1Y returni | +41.02% | +43.54% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.1K (+41.0%) started 2025-09-18 | $14.35K (+43.5%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $30.68K (+206.8%) started 2021-09-20 | $40.48K (+304.8%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $59.83K (+498.3%) started 2016-09-19 | $46.76K (+367.6%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $156.59B | $644.38B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 17.24 | 20.17 |
| Forward P/Ei | 13.68 | 14.72 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 1.32 |
| EV/Revenuei | 2.67 | 1.89 |
| Analyst targeti | $145.33 | $169.68 |
| Target upsidei | +11.49% | +8.28% |
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 35.50% | 44.10% |
| Earnings growthi | 107.00% | 112.80% |
| EPS growthi | +107.00% | +112.80% |
| FCF margini | +11.93% | +5.73% |
| Operating margini | 31.51% | 15.86% |
| Profit margini | 14.40% | 9.07% |
| ROIC proxyi | 14.18% | 12.58% |
| Return on equityi | 14.18% | 12.58% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.58% | 2.63% |
| Payout ratioi | 43.65% | 52.51% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Debt/equityi | 35.64 | 15.92 |
| Current ratioi | 1.54 | 1.14 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.18 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, COP and XOM have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.80), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +41.02% | +43.54% |
| CAGRi | +41.06% | +43.58% | |
| Volatilityi | 30.79% | 25.85% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.13 | 1.36 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.63 | 2.01 | |
| Max drawdowni | 22.86% | 20.65% | |
| Current drawdowni | 6.65% | 4.62% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.09% | 6.14% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.19% | 8.46% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.15% | 5.23% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.85% | 9.01% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +165.20% | +249.48% |
| CAGRi | +21.56% | +28.47% | |
| Volatilityi | 32.69% | 26.61% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.63 | 0.91 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.89 | 1.31 | |
| Max drawdowni | 36.30% | 20.65% | |
| Current drawdowni | 6.65% | 4.62% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.87% | 7.21% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 17.68% | 8.85% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.23% | 7.89% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.57% | 15.35% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +339.62% | +189.34% |
| CAGRi | +15.97% | +11.21% | |
| Volatilityi | 37.62% | 28.38% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.46 | 0.36 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.67 | 0.52 | |
| Max drawdowni | 70.66% | 61.01% | |
| Current drawdowni | 6.65% | 4.62% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 17.76% | 13.09% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.58% | 18.15% | |
| Max daily dropi | 24.84% | 12.22% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 40.88% | 25.80% |
| Category | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ConocoPhillips | Exxon Mobil Corporation |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Core business | ConocoPhillips is a pure-play E&P company focused entirely on finding, developing, and producing oil and gas. Unlike ExxonMobil, COP does not own downstream refining, chemicals, or fuel retail operations. This pure-play model means COP's earnings are more directly correlated to oil and gas prices, and capital can be fully directed toward production growth and per-share cash return. COP's $40–45/barrel breakeven is one of the lowest in the industry. | ExxonMobil is the world's largest publicly traded integrated oil company, with operations spanning upstream E&P (including Pioneer Natural Resources in the Permian), downstream refining and fuel, chemicals (ExxonMobil Chemical), and low-carbon solutions. Its integrated model provides natural hedging — refining margins improve when crude prices fall, partially offsetting upstream earnings declines. XOM's Pioneer acquisition made it the dominant Permian Basin producer with 570,000+ BOE/day in the basin. |
| Investor focus | Investors track per-barrel operating costs, VROC variable returns to shareholders, free cash flow per share at various oil prices, and production growth per share as COP's key value creation metrics. | Investors track upstream production volumes and Permian Basin growth, downstream refining margins (refinery complexity and capacity utilization), ExxonMobil Chemical margins, Pioneer integration progress, and dividend reliability (XOM has increased dividends for 40+ consecutive years). |
- Pure-play E&P model provides direct, clean exposure to oil and gas prices without downstream refining margin noise
- VROC variable distribution mechanism uniquely aligns shareholder returns with oil price cycle economics
- Low-cost global asset base provides free cash flow generation at oil prices significantly below market cycle averages
- Dominant Permian Basin position after Pioneer acquisition with the lowest cost per barrel in the basin at scale
- Integrated model provides earnings diversification — chemicals and refining generate earnings when upstream margins compress
- 40+ consecutive years of dividend increases makes XOM one of the most reliable dividend growth stocks in energy
- Pure E&P model means COP has no downstream earnings buffer during oil price downturns, unlike ExxonMobil's integrated model
- Marathon Oil integration must deliver on promised cost synergies and production growth milestones
- Willow Alaska development requires multi-billion capital commitment before generating production or cash flow
- Premium valuation as the largest US integrated major — XOM typically trades at a higher multiple than pure-play E&P peers
- Pioneer integration is a massive organizational challenge requiring operational harmonization of two large E&P companies
- Downstream refining margins are volatile and can compress XOM's consolidated earnings during refining margin cycles
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.