PSA vs EXR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Public Storage and Extra Space Storage are the two largest US self-storage REITs, both benefiting from the same secular demand drivers (housing mobility, life transitions, downsizing) and facing the same near-term headwinds (Sun Belt market oversupply from 2021–2023 development). PSA's brand scale and balance sheet are its primary advantages; EXR's third-party management platform and revenue management technology differentiate it.
PSA vs EXR is the self-storage brand and balance sheet leader (Public Storage) versus the technology-driven revenue management and third-party management platform leader (Extra Space) — both are excellent REITs navigating the same supply cycle headwind with different operational approaches.
PSA holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PSA leads on both 1-year return (+8.33%) and forward P/E (31.10x vs 31.43x for EXR), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, EXR is growing revenue faster (3.80%), while PSA maintains the higher operating margin (46.03%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for EXR (+2.49%) than for PSA (-1.15%).
- →prefer the world's largest self-storage REIT with brand-driven customer acquisition and balance sheet scale advantages
- →value Public Storage's marketing scale reducing customer acquisition cost vs smaller operators in a commodity storage market
- →want a large-cap REIT dividend with conservative financial management and development pipeline for long-term NOI growth
- →are comfortable with Sun Belt oversupply headwinds on same-store revenue and European operations currency risk from Shurgard
- →prefer Extra Space's technology-driven revenue management and third-party management platform differentiating it from commodity storage peers
- →value the third-party management contract business providing fee income, market intelligence, and future acquisition optionality
- →want the second-largest self-storage REIT following Life Storage merger with post-merger integration upside as synergies realize
- →are comfortable with Life Storage integration complexity and third-party management contract renewal risk
| Metric | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 37.6 | 37.8 |
| AI rank | #1370 | #1349 |
| Latest close | $318.12 | $145.33 |
| 1M return | +6.94% | +3.58% |
| 6M return | +19.07% | +10.20% |
| 1Y return | +8.33% | -1.73% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.94K (+9.4%) started 2025-06-18 | $9.92K (-0.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $14.87K (+48.7%) started 2021-06-21 | $11.94K (+19.4%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $28.37K (+183.7%) started 2016-06-20 | $33.53K (+235.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $57.22B | $33.24B |
| Trailing P/E | 33.67 | 33.92 |
| Forward P/E | 31.10 | 31.43 |
| Price/Sales | 11.21 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 14.69 | 13.37 |
| Analyst target | $322.19 | $154.35 |
| Target upside | -1.15% | +2.49% |
| Metric | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 3.20% | 3.80% |
| Earnings growth | 32.80% | -10.60% |
| EPS growth | +32.80% | -10.60% |
| FCF margin | +47.98% | +38.55% |
| Operating margin | 46.03% | 43.98% |
| Profit margin | 39.06% | 27.14% |
| ROIC proxy | 20.18% | 6.83% |
| Return on equity | 20.18% | 6.83% |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | 4.30% |
| Beta | 0.96 | 1.21 |
| Debt/equity | 107.65 | 98.09 |
| Current ratio | 0.19 | 0.69 |
| Quick ratio | 0.09 | 0.10 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +9.39% | -0.76% |
| CAGR | +9.41% | -0.77% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | -0.08 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.11% | 17.13% | |
| Max daily drop | 5.79% | 10.03% | |
| Max wkly drop | 10.73% | 12.25% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +24.01% | +2.47% |
| CAGR | +4.40% | +0.49% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.11 | -0.00 | |
| Max drawdown | 37.93% | 51.36% | |
| Max daily drop | 8.00% | 10.92% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.88% | 14.36% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +87.40% | +129.92% |
| CAGR | +6.49% | +8.69% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.19 | 0.28 | |
| Max drawdown | 37.93% | 51.36% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.53% | 15.47% | |
| Max wkly drop | 18.98% | 22.18% |
| Category | PSA | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Public Storage | Extra Space Storage Inc. |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | N/A |
| Core business | Public Storage is the world's largest self-storage REIT, operating 3,000+ facilities with 200M+ net rentable square feet across the US and Europe. Its brand dominance, marketing scale, and technology platform (app-based rentals, smart locks, digital marketing) enable customer acquisition at lower cost than smaller operators. Public Storage recently acquired Simply Self Storage and has a large development pipeline. The PS Business Parks disposition allowed PSA to focus purely on self-storage. | Extra Space Storage is the second-largest self-storage REIT after its acquisition of Life Storage, operating 3,700+ locations across the US. Extra Space's management platform (it manages 1,000+ third-party facilities in addition to its own) provides scale leverage in digital marketing, revenue management algorithms, and operational oversight. Its third-party management business generates fee income and provides optionality to acquire managed properties at favorable pricing. |
| Investor focus | Investors track same-store revenue growth, occupancy rates, realized annual rent per square foot, digital marketing and rental automation platform investments, and acquisition and development pipeline. | Investors track same-store NOI growth, third-party management contract count and growth, Life Storage integration progress, occupancy vs street rates (revenue management performance), and AFFO per share. |
- →Brand scale advantage: Public Storage's brand recognition drives customer acquisition from direct search at lower marketing cost per customer than smaller operators
- →Technology platform investments in digital rentals, smart locks, and automated entry reduce operating costs per facility vs labor-intensive management
- →Balance sheet scale enables acquisitions and developments that smaller self-storage REITs cannot efficiently execute at comparable cost of capital
- →Third-party management platform managing 1,000+ outside facilities provides competitive intelligence, future acquisition pipeline, and fee income
- →Revenue management algorithms are among the most sophisticated in self-storage, allowing real-time pricing optimization across markets
- →Life Storage acquisition created the second-largest self-storage operator with significant facility count to justify national marketing scale
- →Self-storage market faced oversupply in many Sun Belt markets as pandemic-era development surged 2021–2023, driving same-store revenue weakness
- →Rate discounting to maintain occupancy compresses realized annual rent per square foot during supply-pressured periods
- →European operations (Shurgard, partially owned) add currency risk and operating complexity not shared by purely US peers
- →Same-store revenue growth has been under pressure from Sun Belt oversupply similar to Public Storage's challenge
- →Life Storage integration is a large organizational project — synergy realization requires operational harmonization across both platforms
- →Third-party management contracts can be terminated — concentration among few large third-party owner relationships creates some concentration risk
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.