MRK vs ABBV Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Merck and AbbVie are both large-cap pharma income investments with major franchise drugs facing patent cliffs at different points in time. AbbVie is already in the middle of its Humira LOE — and navigating it successfully with Skyrizi and Rinvoq. Merck's Keytruda cliff is still years away, giving Merck stronger near-term earnings growth. Both pay dividends and invest in pipeline diversification.
MRK vs ABBV compares the forward-looking Keytruda cliff risk (Merck, 2028) against the already-in-progress and being-managed Humira cliff (AbbVie) — AbbVie has demonstrated successful LOE navigation, while Merck is earlier in its post-LOE planning phase with Winrevair and ADCs as mitigation vehicles.
MRK holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. MRK leads on both 1-year return (+45.47%) and forward P/E (12.45x vs 14.01x for ABBV), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, ABBV is growing revenue faster (12.40%), while MRK maintains the higher operating margin (38.60%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +8.98% for MRK and +11.34% for ABBV.
- →prefer the Keytruda oncology franchise as the current global leader in cancer immunotherapy with peak revenue years ahead
- →value Winrevair's PAH market opportunity and ADC pipeline as Keytruda cliff mitigation beyond 2028
- →want dividend income from a pharma company with stronger near-term earnings growth than AbbVie while Keytruda peaks
- →are comfortable with Keytruda IRA pricing negotiation and the 2028 US patent cliff as medium-term risks
- →prefer AbbVie's demonstrated LOE management success — Skyrizi and Rinvoq are already replacing Humira revenue at high growth rates
- →value the 3%+ dividend yield as among the highest sustainable yields in quality large-cap biopharma
- →want exposure to immunology platform leadership with Botox aesthetics as consumer healthcare diversification
- →are comfortable with Humira net revenue drag continuing near-term before Skyrizi/Rinvoq fully offset the erosion
| Metric | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 51.6 | 52.0 |
| AI rank | #369 | #346 |
| Latest close | $113.87 | $216.49 |
| 1M return | -0.32% | +1.28% |
| 6M return | +14.81% | -3.49% |
| 1Y return | +45.47% | +16.72% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.36K (+43.6%) started 2025-06-18 | $11.67K (+16.7%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $18.71K (+87.1%) started 2021-06-21 | $26.07K (+160.7%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $37.38K (+273.8%) started 2016-06-20 | $83.39K (+733.9%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $294.03B | $402.35B |
| Trailing P/E | 33.54 | 111.09 |
| Forward P/E | 12.45 | 14.01 |
| Price/Sales | 3.10 | 5.85 |
| EV/Revenue | 5.13 | 7.42 |
| Analyst target | $129.74 | $253.55 |
| Target upside | +8.98% | +11.34% |
| Metric | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 4.90% | 12.40% |
| Earnings growth | -19.30% | -46.20% |
| EPS growth | -19.30% | -46.20% |
| FCF margin | +21.36% | +33.13% |
| Operating margin | 38.60% | 32.16% |
| Profit margin | 13.59% | 5.79% |
| ROIC proxy | 18.94% | 6225.00% |
| Return on equity | 18.94% | 6225.00% |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 3.04% |
| Beta | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| Debt/equity | 106.94 | 4789.60 |
| Current ratio | 1.30 | 0.80 |
| Quick ratio | 0.70 | 0.52 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +43.61% | +16.71% |
| CAGR | +43.69% | +16.74% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.31 | 0.57 | |
| Max drawdown | 11.90% | 19.23% | |
| Max daily drop | 4.44% | 5.20% | |
| Max wkly drop | 7.12% | 8.49% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +66.14% | +120.43% |
| CAGR | +10.70% | +17.16% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.61 | |
| Max drawdown | 43.44% | 21.92% | |
| Max daily drop | 9.86% | 12.57% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.42% | 17.30% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +176.77% | +426.67% |
| CAGR | +10.72% | +18.09% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.60 | |
| Max drawdown | 43.44% | 45.09% | |
| Max daily drop | 9.86% | 16.25% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.71% | 19.39% |
| Category | MRK | ABBV |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Merck & Co., Inc. | AbbVie Inc. |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Core business | Merck's Keytruda is the world's most prescribed cancer immunotherapy, approved in 30+ cancer types and generating $25B+ annually. Gardasil HPV vaccine and Winrevair (PAH) supplement the oncology franchise. Keytruda loses US patent protection beginning around 2028, representing the primary medium-term challenge for Merck's earnings. The ADC pipeline (MK-2870) and Winrevair are key diversification vehicles. | AbbVie's Skyrizi (IL-23 inhibitor) and Rinvoq (JAK1 inhibitor) are collectively generating $15B+ and growing rapidly as they offset Humira biosimilar erosion. Botox (aesthetic and therapeutic) from the Allergan acquisition provides consumer healthcare diversification. AbbVie's 3%+ dividend yield is among the highest in large-cap biopharma. The Humira LOE is already well underway, and AbbVie has successfully navigated it — unlike Merck's forward-looking Keytruda cliff. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Keytruda global expansion, Gardasil China recovery, Winrevair launch, and the strategic path to filling the Keytruda 2028 revenue gap with new products or M&A. | Investors track Skyrizi and Rinvoq combined revenue growth, Humira net erosion pace, Botox aesthetic revenue, and total revenue stabilization as Humira erosion is offset by immunology growth. |
- →Keytruda first-line approvals in NSCLC, melanoma, and bladder cancer make it the standard of care in the most common cancer types globally
- →Winrevair's differentiated PAH mechanism provides a large new cardiovascular drug category independent of oncology
- →Strong balance sheet and cash flow support both R&D investment and M&A to address the Keytruda cliff
- →Skyrizi and Rinvoq immunology duo is growing at 50%+ annually from an already large base, successfully replacing Humira
- →Allergan aesthetics business (Botox cosmetic) is recession-resilient and consumer-brand-driven, uncorrelated with typical pharma patent cliffs
- →Dividend yield (3%+) is among the highest in quality large-cap biopharma, supported by immunology franchise cash flows
- →Keytruda IRA drug price negotiation for US Medicare Part D reduces US pricing power from 2028 onward
- →Gardasil China demand has been weak due to regulatory and reimbursement uncertainty
- →Pipeline needs significant clinical successes before 2028 to sustainably bridge the Keytruda LOE impact
- →Net revenue impact from Humira erosion is still being absorbed — total AbbVie revenue is growing but the Humira drag is significant
- →Skyrizi and Rinvoq face long-term JAK and IL-23 biosimilar and next-generation competitor pressure after their own eventual LOEs
- →Allergan aesthetics sensitivity to consumer discretionary spending cycles can create short-term revenue volatility
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.