STLA vs GM Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
STLA and GM are both large-cap legacy automakers dependent on North American truck profits while investing in EV transitions. Stellantis has Jeep/Ram brand power and 14 global brands but lacks GM's China JV presence; GM has deeper US truck market share and Cadillac premium EV positioning. Both trade at low P/E multiples reflecting EV transition uncertainty; both offer dividends and buybacks from ICE cash flows.
STLA vs GM — Stellantis (the 14-brand merger entity with global Jeep appeal, Ram truck profits, and Dare Forward 2030 EV commitment across Europe and North America) versus General Motors (the US truck leader with Silverado/Sierra dominance, Ultium EV platform, Cadillac EV premium positioning, and established China JV operations now under domestic EV pressure).
GM holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. GM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+38.22% vs -52.65%), though STLA has the better forward P/E setup (4.23x vs 5.81x for GM). On fundamentals, STLA is growing revenue faster (13.10%), while GM maintains the higher operating margin (3.20%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for STLA (+32.43%) than for GM (+17.30%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- want Jeep's global brand power across markets GM's Chevrolet and Buick don't reach as strongly
- value geographic diversification beyond North America and China through Stellantis's European brand portfolio
- see Dare Forward 2030's aggressive EV commitment positioning Stellantis well for European regulatory mandates
- are comfortable with European market softness, leadership transition risk, and minimal China market presence
- prefer the deepest US truck market penetration — Silverado has perennial top-2 US vehicle sales generating margin for EV transition and shareholder returns
- value GM's Cadillac EV brand in the US premium segment vs Stellantis's European premium brands with smaller US footprint
- want consistent dividend and buyback from truck cash flows at 5-8x P/E valuation with significant share repurchase
- are comfortable with Cruise restructuring costs, China market deterioration, and EV division cash burn
| Metric | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 36.9 | 55.0 |
| AI ranki | #2526 | #307 |
| Latest closei | $4.65 | $92.43 |
| 1M returni | +3.56% | +15.21% |
| 3M returni | -17.41% | +3.67% |
| 6M returni | -39.30% | +17.45% |
| 1Y returni | -52.65% | +38.22% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $4.74K (-52.6%) started 2025-11-04 | $13.44K (+34.4%) started 2025-11-05 |
| 5Y ago | $4.41K (-55.9%) started 2021-11-05 | $16.41K (+64.1%) started 2021-11-08 |
| 10Y ago | $27.09K (+170.9%) started 2016-11-07 | $41.4K (+314.0%) started 2016-11-07 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $19.85B | $78.03B |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | 38.51 |
| Forward P/Ei | 4.23 | 5.81 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.23 | 0.98 |
| Analyst targeti | $6.98 | $101.19 |
| Target upsidei | +32.43% | +17.30% |
| Metric | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 13.10% | 1.90% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | -26.20% |
| EPS growthi | N/A | -26.20% |
| FCF margini | -1.88% | +11.82% |
| Operating margini | 2.24% | 3.20% |
| Profit margini | -12.10% | 1.05% |
| ROIC proxyi | -28.69% | 3.16% |
| Return on equityi | -28.69% | 3.16% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.84% |
| Payout ratioi | 61.10% | 15.10% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.99 | 1.33 |
| Debt/equityi | 84.39 | 202.34 |
| Current ratioi | 1.04 | 1.14 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.68 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, STLA and GM have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.44), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -52.65% | +34.40% |
| CAGRi | -52.67% | +34.45% | |
| Volatilityi | 51.27% | 34.34% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.28 | 0.92 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.66 | 1.43 | |
| Max drawdowni | 66.50% | 16.20% | |
| Current drawdowni | 61.63% | 0.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 38.10% | 6.74% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 42.95% | 8.23% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.69% | 6.84% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.24% | 9.58% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -68.81% | +59.49% |
| CAGRi | -20.80% | +9.80% | |
| Volatilityi | 43.16% | 36.92% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.43 | 0.32 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.58 | 0.47 | |
| Max drawdowni | 83.94% | 58.96% | |
| Current drawdowni | 81.61% | 0.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 37.39% | 27.68% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 45.20% | 32.21% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.69% | 8.99% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.24% | 15.34% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +21.11% | +243.09% |
| CAGRi | +1.94% | +13.13% | |
| Volatilityi | 41.81% | 37.39% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.15 | 0.40 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.21 | 0.59 | |
| Max drawdowni | 83.94% | 59.96% | |
| Current drawdowni | 81.61% | 0.00% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 30.23% | 21.14% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 38.14% | 26.23% | |
| Max daily dropi | 23.69% | 17.32% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 36.69% | 35.38% |
| Category | STLA | GM |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Stellantis N.V. | General Motors Company |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturers | Auto Manufacturers |
| Core business | Stellantis is the global automaker formed from the 2021 merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group, operating 14 brands including Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Chrysler, Fiat, Peugeot, Citroën, Opel, Maserati, and Alfa Romeo. Stellantis has significant US truck exposure through Ram pickup trucks and Jeep SUVs. Stellantis has an aggressive EV commitment — the Dare Forward 2030 plan targets 100% BEV in Europe and 50% BEV in the US by 2030. Stellantis operates production facilities across North America, Europe, and South America. | General Motors produces Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, and Buick vehicles with dominant US market position particularly in trucks. GM's Silverado and Sierra are perennial top-3 best-selling US vehicles. GM has China JV operations through SAIC-GM. GM is investing in the Ultium EV platform through the Ultium Cells LG Energy joint venture. GM restructured its Cruise autonomous vehicle division after a safety incident. US truck and SUV dominance makes GM the strongest incumbent in America's most profitable vehicle segments. |
| Investor focus | Investors focus on Stellantis's Ram truck profitability, Jeep brand health globally, EV transition execution under Dare Forward 2030, and performance of European brands (Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat) in a soft European market. | Investors focus on GM's EBIT margins from trucks, Ultium EV ramp and losses, Cruise restructuring costs, China JV profitability trend, and capital return programs. |
- Jeep global brand power: Jeep Grand Cherokee and Wrangler command strong pricing and brand loyalty globally across North America, Europe, and emerging markets
- Ram truck profitability: Ram competes in the US's most profitable vehicle segment earning high margins from pickup truck sales funded by Jeep profitability
- Diversified 14-brand portfolio across price points: from entry-level Fiat to premium Maserati, enables Stellantis to serve multiple market segments and amortize EV platform investment across brands
- Silverado + Sierra truck dominance: perennial top-2 US vehicle sales generating exceptional margins that fund EV transition and shareholder returns
- Low P/E valuation: GM at 5-8x P/E is among the cheapest large-cap US stocks providing value investor margin of safety
- Cadillac EV premium positioning: Cadillac Lyriq and Optiq target the US luxury EV segment with established domestic brand credibility
- European market softness: Stellantis's Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat brands have faced volume pressure in weak European consumer auto demand
- Leadership transition uncertainty: Stellantis went through significant executive changes creating investor uncertainty about strategic direction continuity
- Minimal China market presence: Stellantis has no significant China JV operations vs GM's established JV revenue and market infrastructure
- Cruise autonomous losses and setbacks: billions spent on Cruise with restructuring required after a safety incident — expected autonomous vehicle revenue contribution delayed
- China market deterioration: GM's China JV profits are declining as BYD and domestic EVs gain share from foreign brands
- EV division losses: Ultium-based EV vehicles currently lose money per unit — path to EV profitability depends on volume and battery cost reduction timelines
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on STLA and GM. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside STLA and GM, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.