LVS vs WYNN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
LVS is a pure-play Asian gaming operator concentrated in Macau and Singapore following its Las Vegas property exit, while WYNN retains a Las Vegas presence alongside Macau exposure and is making a new bet on the UAE market. Both are heavily levered to Macau's gaming recovery but differ in geographic diversification strategy.
LVS vs WYNN compares two Macau-exposed casino operators, one a pure-play Asian gaming company and the other a luxury operator diversifying into a new Middle Eastern market while retaining Las Vegas operations.
LVS holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LVS leads on both 1-year return (-24.86%) and forward P/E quality (12.78x vs 18.45x for WYNN), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, WYNN is growing revenue faster (6.90%), while LVS maintains the higher operating margin (19.66%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for WYNN (+39.18%) than for LVS (+31.15%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want concentrated, pure-play exposure to Macau and Singapore gaming markets
- Believe Marina Bay Sands' expansion will drive substantial future growth
- Are comfortable with full dependence on Asian gaming market conditions
- Want exposure to the ultra-luxury segment with both Las Vegas and Macau presence
- See significant upside in the new UAE resort opening
- Prefer some geographic diversification beyond pure Asian gaming exposure
| Metric | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 28.1 | 26.9 |
| AI ranki | #2382 | #2519 |
| Latest closei | $39.98 | $81.68 |
| 1M returni | -14.17% | -18.40% |
| 6M returni | -26.03% | -20.82% |
| 1Y returni | -24.86% | -36.52% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $7.51K (-24.9%) started 2025-09-18 | $6.35K (-36.5%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $11.44K (+14.4%) started 2021-09-20 | $10.44K (+4.4%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $11.2K (+12.0%) started 2016-09-19 | $9.78K (-2.2%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $29.17B | $9.81B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 17.46 | 22.84 |
| Forward P/Ei | 12.78 | 18.45 |
| Price/Salesi | 2.54 | 1.25 |
| EV/Revenuei | 3.02 | 2.59 |
| Analyst targeti | $59.07 | $132.58 |
| Target upsidei | +31.15% | +39.18% |
| Metric | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | -0.70% | 6.90% |
| Earnings growthi | -19.80% | 106.10% |
| EPS growthi | -19.80% | +106.10% |
| FCF margini | +16.13% | +6.42% |
| Operating margini | 19.66% | 16.54% |
| Profit margini | 12.59% | 6.05% |
| ROIC proxyi | 122.87% | N/A |
| Return on equityi | 122.87% | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.71% | 1.05% |
| Payout ratioi | 42.64% | 23.98% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.83 | 1.00 |
| Debt/equityi | 1703.90 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.93 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, LVS and WYNN have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.64), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -24.86% | -36.52% |
| CAGRi | -24.88% | -36.54% | |
| Volatilityi | 34.95% | 33.48% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.77 | -1.33 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.01 | -1.78 | |
| Max drawdowni | 42.47% | 38.74% | |
| Current drawdowni | 42.47% | 38.74% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.37% | 18.00% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.87% | 20.13% | |
| Max daily dropi | 13.96% | 7.26% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.06% | 10.69% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +10.12% | +1.90% |
| CAGRi | +1.95% | +0.38% | |
| Volatilityi | 40.01% | 40.75% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.14 | 0.10 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.20 | 0.15 | |
| Max drawdowni | 51.18% | 46.95% | |
| Current drawdowni | 42.47% | 38.74% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.89% | 18.16% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.89% | 21.22% | |
| Max daily dropi | 13.96% | 12.25% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.58% | 23.01% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -12.75% | -12.62% |
| CAGRi | -1.35% | -1.34% | |
| Volatilityi | 38.73% | 46.63% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.04 | 0.11 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.06 | 0.16 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.77% | 77.40% | |
| Current drawdowni | 43.23% | 56.05% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 25.93% | 39.78% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 29.77% | 44.05% | |
| Max daily dropi | 17.59% | 24.43% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 21.93% | 46.80% |
| Category | LVS | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Las Vegas Sands Corp. | Wynn Resorts, Limited |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Resorts & Casinos | Resorts & Casinos |
| Core business | Las Vegas Sands operates large-scale integrated resorts in Macau and Singapore (Marina Bay Sands), having exited its Las Vegas properties to focus entirely on Asian gaming markets. | Wynn Resorts operates ultra-luxury casino resorts in Las Vegas, Macau, and a new property in the United Arab Emirates, positioning itself at the high end of the gaming and hospitality market. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Macau and Singapore gaming revenue recovery, Marina Bay Sands' expansion project, and the company's pure-play Asian gaming exposure following its U.S. property sales. | Investors track Macau VIP and mass-market gaming revenue recovery, the opening and ramp-up of Wynn Al Marjan Island in the UAE, and the company's premium positioning versus broader market demand. |
- Dominant integrated resort positions in both Macau and Singapore
- Marina Bay Sands is one of the most profitable single casino properties globally
- Pure-play Asian gaming focus following exit from U.S. Las Vegas operations
- Ultra-luxury brand positioning commands premium pricing and customer loyalty
- First-mover advantage with the new UAE resort opening in a previously untapped gaming market
- Significant Macau exposure provides leverage to a Chinese gaming recovery
- Complete dependence on Asian gaming markets removes U.S. diversification
- Macau recovery pace and Chinese regulatory policy directly drive results
- Major Marina Bay Sands expansion carries substantial capital and execution risk
- Heavy reliance on Macau makes results sensitive to Chinese economic and travel conditions
- UAE resort carries substantial execution and ramp-up risk as a new market entrant
- High debt levels from luxury resort development
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.