XOM vs SHEL Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ExxonMobil and Shell are both international oil majors but with different strategic emphases. ExxonMobil is explicitly hydrocarbon-focused — investing in Permian Basin and Guyana for long-term upstream production. Shell is more transition-oriented with major LNG and partial renewables strategies. ExxonMobil's Permian scale and integrated capital discipline appeal to energy income investors; Shell's LNG and transition balance appeal to investors seeking energy with lower carbon exposure.
XOM vs SHEL is the US oil major doubling down on Permian Basin and Guyana upstream production with explicit hydrocarbon capital discipline and Pioneer integration creating the largest Permian producer (ExxonMobil) versus the European oil major with LNG market leadership and partial energy transition strategy balancing hydrocarbon production with gas infrastructure and renewables exposure (Shell) — pure hydrocarbon capital discipline vs LNG-heavy transition-oriented integrated energy.
XOM holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. XOM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+44.96% vs +37.26%), though SHEL has the better forward P/E setup (9.14x vs 14.72x for XOM). SHEL leads on both revenue growth (44.70%) and operating margin (16.69%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +8.28% for XOM and +6.14% for SHEL.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer the largest US oil major with explicit hydrocarbon-first strategy, Permian Basin production scale from Pioneer acquisition, and proven capital discipline above $35/bbl breakeven
- value ExxonMobil's integrated model providing refining margin hedge vs pure upstream producers during low oil price environments
- want US energy sector exposure with the most aggressive capital return commitments and dividend growth from an energy major with structural cost advantages
- are comfortable with crude oil price sensitivity, Guyana offshore development execution risk, and long-dated energy transition disruption risk
- prefer the LNG market leader with structural advantages in global gas trading, liquefaction, and Asian import markets — the largest private-sector LNG company
- value Shell's partial energy transition positioning with lower carbon intensity relative to pure upstream oil majors — more acceptable to European ESG-oriented institutional investors
- want international energy exposure with European regulatory political license to operate and LNG as a cleaner-than-coal bridge fuel beneficiary
- are comfortable with European political energy transition strategy volatility, LNG oversupply risk from Qatar/US/Australia expansion, and renewables investments delivering subpar returns
| Metric | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 53.0 | 42.8 |
| AI ranki | #361 | #918 |
| Latest closei | $163.54 | $94.54 |
| 1M returni | -0.95% | +1.91% |
| 6M returni | +2.42% | +6.41% |
| 1Y returni | +44.96% | +37.26% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.6K (+46.0%) started 2025-09-22 | $14.24K (+42.4%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $39.37K (+293.7%) started 2021-09-22 | $35.27K (+252.7%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $46.93K (+369.3%) started 2016-09-22 | $57.32K (+473.2%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $644.38B | $269.99B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.17 | 10.46 |
| Forward P/Ei | 14.72 | 9.14 |
| Price/Salesi | 1.32 | 0.91 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.89 | 1.03 |
| Analyst targeti | $169.68 | $100.35 |
| Target upsidei | +8.28% | +6.14% |
| Metric | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 44.10% | 44.70% |
| Earnings growthi | 112.80% | 220.00% |
| EPS growthi | +112.80% | +220.00% |
| FCF margini | +5.73% | +7.23% |
| Operating margini | 15.86% | 16.69% |
| Profit margini | 9.07% | 8.76% |
| ROIC proxyi | 12.58% | 14.34% |
| Return on equityi | 12.58% | 14.34% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.63% | 3.31% |
| Payout ratioi | 52.51% | 32.71% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | 3 yrs |
| Betai | 0.17 | -0.22 |
| Debt/equityi | 15.92 | 40.20 |
| Current ratioi | 1.14 | 1.44 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.80 | 0.98 |
Over the past year, XOM and SHEL have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.68), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +45.99% | +37.26% |
| CAGRi | +46.26% | +37.29% | |
| Volatilityi | 25.86% | 22.91% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.43 | 1.31 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.12 | 1.90 | |
| Max drawdowni | 20.65% | 17.98% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.62% | 4.46% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.17% | 4.18% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.48% | 5.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 5.23% | 5.28% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.01% | 8.20% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +239.86% | +188.07% |
| CAGRi | +27.74% | +23.60% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.59% | 24.96% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.89 | 0.80 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.28 | 1.13 | |
| Max drawdowni | 20.65% | 25.04% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.62% | 4.46% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.22% | 5.40% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.85% | 7.28% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.89% | 8.08% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 15.35% | 18.21% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +190.34% | +217.74% |
| CAGRi | +11.25% | +12.26% | |
| Volatilityi | 28.38% | 29.87% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.36 | 0.39 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.52 | 0.54 | |
| Max drawdowni | 61.01% | 67.24% | |
| Current drawdowni | 4.62% | 4.46% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.11% | 13.25% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 18.16% | 20.14% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.22% | 17.17% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.80% | 37.32% |
| Category | XOM | SHEL |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Exxon Mobil Corporation | Shell plc |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Core business | ExxonMobil is the largest US integrated oil and gas company with upstream E&P (Permian Basin, Guyana), downstream refining and chemicals, and a growing low-carbon energy solutions segment. ExxonMobil's Pioneer Natural Resources acquisition in 2024 dramatically expanded its Permian Basin position — making XOM the largest Permian producer. ExxonMobil's integrated model means it produces oil and gas, refines it into fuels and petrochemicals, and sells products globally. XOM is explicit about remaining a hydrocarbon-focused company rather than pivoting aggressively to renewables. | Shell is one of the largest European integrated energy companies with operations across upstream oil and gas, LNG (liquefied natural gas), downstream refining and marketing, and an integrated gas/renewables transition strategy. Shell has been divesting higher-carbon assets and investing in LNG, biofuels, EV charging infrastructure, and hydrogen as part of its energy transition strategy. Shell's LNG business is among the world's largest — Shell's global LNG trading and liquefaction gives it structural advantages in gas markets. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Permian Basin oil production, project returns vs capital budget, Pioneer acquisition integration, and free cash flow generation across the commodity cycle. | Investors track LNG volume and margins, oil and gas production, renewables investment returns, and dividend/buyback returns to shareholders. |
- Largest Permian Basin producer after Pioneer acquisition: XOM's Permian production scale creates cost advantages and long-term resource life in the most productive US oil basin
- Capital discipline: ExxonMobil's 2020 restructuring dramatically improved project economics — only investing in the highest-return projects above $35/bbl breakeven
- Integrated model: when crude oil is cheap, refining margins expand — integration provides natural earnings hedge across commodity cycles
- LNG market leadership: Shell's global LNG portfolio — from Australian LNG to US liquefaction to Asian importers — creates unique gas market trading and physical supply advantages
- European energy transition strategy provides political license to operate in Europe — Shell's transition narrative is more acceptable to European regulators and institutional investors than ExxonMobil's explicit hydrocarbon focus
- Chemical and downstream integration provides refining margin contributions independent of upstream oil price
- Oil price dependency: XOM's earnings are highly sensitive to crude oil price — every $10/bbl change impacts ExxonMobil's earnings by $2–3B annually
- Guyana offshore development remains critical for long-term growth — executing multiple FPSOs on schedule and budget is a multi-year capital project risk
- Energy transition risk is long-dated but real: XOM's capital allocation assumes hydrocarbons remain primary energy for decades — wrong bet timing would be severe
- Shell's energy transition investments have delivered poor returns — wind, solar, and power businesses acquired during the transition push have been partially divested as returns underperformed
- European political pressure on oil companies creates strategic volatility — Shell's strategic direction has shifted multiple times between hydrocarbon focus and renewable pivot
- LNG market competition is intensifying as Qatar, US LNG, and Australian projects all expand supply toward a potential LNG oversupply environment
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.