HYLB vs FALN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
HYLB provides broad market-weight exposure to the entire U.S. high-yield corporate bond market, while FALN targets the specific 'fallen angel' segment of recently downgraded bonds that may benefit from forced selling at downgrade. Both offer high-yield credit exposure but with different portfolio construction philosophies and risk-return profiles.
HYLB vs FALN contrasts passive broad high-yield market exposure against a factor-based strategy targeting fallen angel bonds — market-cap high yield versus a selective approach to the portion of high yield with the best ex-investment-grade pedigree.
HYLB holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. FALN has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+8.32% vs +6.79% for HYLB).
- →Want broad, market-weight high-yield bond exposure across the entire non-investment-grade corporate bond universe
- →Value DWS's competitive expense ratio for a core high-yield fixed income allocation
- →Prefer straightforward market-cap weighted high-yield exposure without factor tilts or selective strategy
- →Want to capture the documented fallen angel premium — the historical outperformance of recently downgraded bonds versus the broad high-yield market
- →Value higher-quality former-investment-grade issuers as a way to access high-yield yields with potentially better credit fundamentals
- →Are interested in a factor-based approach to high-yield that tilts away from born-junk issuers toward higher-pedigree fallen companies
| Metric | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 46.0 | 42.0 |
| Latest close | $36.50 | $27.19 |
| 1M return | +1.29% | +2.28% |
| 6M return | +2.39% | +2.75% |
| 1Y return | +6.79% | +8.32% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.41K (+14.1%) started 2025-06-18 | $11.57K (+15.7%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $17.1K (+71.0%) started 2021-06-18 | $16.59K (+65.9%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $31.73K (+217.3%) started 2016-12-13 | $40.15K (+301.5%) started 2016-06-21 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.25% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $3.48B | $1.66B |
| Dividend yield | 6.44% | 6.40% |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| 52-week change | 6.79% | 8.32% |
| Metric | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +6.79% | +8.32% |
| 6M return | +2.39% | +2.75% |
| 1M return | +1.29% | +2.28% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 0.79 |
| Beta | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| Dividend yield | 6.44% | 6.40% |
| 5Y CAGR | +4.05% | +3.84% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +6.79% | +8.32% |
| CAGR | +6.79% | +8.33% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 0.79 | |
| Max drawdown | 2.27% | 3.96% | |
| Max daily drop | 0.93% | 1.19% | |
| Max wkly drop | 1.06% | 1.62% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +21.97% | +20.74% |
| CAGR | +4.05% | +3.84% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.03 | -0.06 | |
| Max drawdown | 15.54% | 18.78% | |
| Max daily drop | 3.67% | 3.34% | |
| Max wkly drop | 6.82% | 6.61% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +55.16% | +88.63% |
| CAGR | +4.73% | +6.56% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
| Max drawdown | 22.91% | 29.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 5.39% | 7.69% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.12% | 16.38% |
| Category | HYLB | FALN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.25% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $3.48B | $1.66B |
| Dividend yield | 6.44% | 6.40% |
- →Broad high-yield market coverage provides diversified exposure across the complete non-investment-grade bond universe
- →DWS/Deutsche Bank management provides institutional credibility in fixed income indexing
- →High-yield bonds offer significantly higher yields than investment-grade bonds, compensating for higher default risk
- →Academic research suggests fallen angel bonds historically outperform the broad high-yield market on a risk-adjusted basis over time
- →Fallen angels typically have better business characteristics than originally-issued high-yield bonds (born-junk companies) — they were once investment-grade for a reason
- →Contrarian value hypothesis — forced selling by investment-grade mandated investors at downgrade creates temporary undervaluation
- →High-yield bonds can experience significant price declines in economic downturns as default concerns rise and liquidity dries up
- →Correlation to equities increases in risk-off environments — high-yield bonds tend to sell off alongside stocks in market stress
- →Credit cycle management matters — rising defaults and credit spread widening hurt high-yield bond total returns
- →Fallen angel supply is cyclical and depends on economic conditions — recessions produce many fallen angels as investment-grade companies are downgraded
- →Higher average quality (more BB-rated) than broad high-yield means slightly lower yield in normal markets
- →The historical outperformance of fallen angels is documented but may not persist as the strategy becomes more widely known and traded
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.