SGOL vs SIVR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SGOL and SIVR are physically-backed precious metals ETFs providing direct exposure to gold and silver price movements respectively. Gold (SGOL) is the primary safe-haven, store-of-value precious metal, while silver (SIVR) combines precious metal characteristics with significant industrial demand — resulting in higher volatility and different drivers for silver versus gold.
SGOL vs SIVR compares physical gold and physical silver ETF exposure — gold as the lower-volatility safe-haven and inflation hedge, silver as the higher-volatility precious metal with industrial growth tailwinds.
SGOL holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. SIVR has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+79.18% vs +25.03% for SGOL).
- →Want conservative, lower-volatility precious metals exposure as a portfolio diversifier and inflation hedge
- →Value physical gold's millennia-long recognition as a store of value and safe-haven asset
- →Prefer Swiss vault storage geography for their gold holdings as additional geopolitical diversification
- →Want precious metals exposure with the additional benefit of industrial demand tailwinds from solar, EVs, and electronics
- →Value silver's historically higher leverage to gold in precious metals bull markets for amplified potential returns
- →Are comfortable with higher volatility than gold in exchange for silver's additional industrial commodity growth dynamics
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 65.0 | 66.0 |
| Latest close | $40.16 | $62.55 |
| 1M return | -5.93% | -11.00% |
| 6M return | -2.95% | -1.15% |
| 1Y return | +25.03% | +79.18% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.5K (+25.0%) started 2025-06-18 | $17.92K (+79.2%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $23.72K (+137.2%) started 2021-06-18 | $25.15K (+151.5%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $31.99K (+219.9%) started 2016-06-20 | $36.45K (+264.5%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.17% | 0.30% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $7.71B | $5.22B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.17 | 0.48 |
| 52-week change | 25.03% | 79.18% |
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +25.03% | +79.18% |
| 6M return | -2.95% | -1.15% |
| 1M return | -5.93% | -11.00% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.80 | 1.22 |
| Beta | 0.17 | 0.48 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 5Y CAGR | +18.86% | +20.26% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +25.03% | +79.18% |
| CAGR | +25.05% | +79.25% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.80 | 1.22 | |
| Max drawdown | 24.37% | 45.33% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.25% | 36.85% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +137.21% | +151.51% |
| CAGR | +18.86% | +20.26% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.80 | 0.57 | |
| Max drawdown | 24.37% | 45.33% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.25% | 36.85% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +219.87% | +264.51% |
| CAGR | +12.34% | +13.82% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.53 | 0.43 | |
| Max drawdown | 24.37% | 45.33% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.25% | 36.85% |
| Category | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.17% | 0.30% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $7.71B | $5.22B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
- →Physical gold backing provides direct precious metal exposure without counterparty risk from gold futures or gold mining stocks
- →Swiss vault storage provides geopolitical diversification for investors concerned about gold stored in U.S. jurisdictions
- →Gold is the most liquid precious metal with deep global market and universally recognized store of value characteristics
- →Physical silver backing provides direct precious metal exposure
- →Silver has significant industrial demand from solar panels, EVs, and electronics — providing industrial growth tailwind alongside monetary precious metal properties
- →Silver historically moves with more leverage than gold in precious metals bull markets, providing amplified upside during commodity cycles
- →Gold ETFs charge annual expenses (management fees) that create a small but persistent drag versus owning physical gold directly
- →Gold price performance is driven by real interest rates, U.S. dollar strength, and uncertainty/risk sentiment — all variable and hard to predict
- →Competing gold ETFs (GLD, IAU, GLDM) offer similar physical gold exposure — investors should compare expense ratios when selecting among gold ETFs
- →Silver is significantly more volatile than gold — industrial demand fluctuations add volatility beyond the typical precious metal inflation/dollar hedge dynamics
- →Storage costs for silver are higher relative to gold given silver's lower value density (more storage space needed per dollar of value)
- →The gold/silver ratio has historically been volatile — silver can dramatically underperform gold in risk-off environments despite often outperforming in bull markets
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.