SGOL vs SIVR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SGOL and SIVR are physically-backed precious metals ETFs providing direct exposure to gold and silver price movements respectively. Gold (SGOL) is the primary safe-haven, store-of-value precious metal, while silver (SIVR) combines precious metal characteristics with significant industrial demand — resulting in higher volatility and different drivers for silver versus gold.
SGOL vs SIVR compares physical gold and physical silver ETF exposure — gold as the lower-volatility safe-haven and inflation hedge, silver as the higher-volatility precious metal with industrial growth tailwinds.
SGOL and SIVR are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. SIVR has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+3.77% vs -1.55% for SGOL).
- Want conservative, lower-volatility precious metals exposure as a portfolio diversifier and inflation hedge
- Value physical gold's millennia-long recognition as a store of value and safe-haven asset
- Prefer Swiss vault storage geography for their gold holdings as additional geopolitical diversification
- Want precious metals exposure with the additional benefit of industrial demand tailwinds from solar, EVs, and electronics
- Value silver's historically higher leverage to gold in precious metals bull markets for amplified potential returns
- Are comfortable with higher volatility than gold in exchange for silver's additional industrial commodity growth dynamics
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 26.7 | 26.8 |
| Latest closei | $37.54 | $47.94 |
| 1M returni | -4.87% | -16.73% |
| 3M returni | -2.70% | -13.04% |
| 6M returni | -12.74% | -30.80% |
| 1Y returni | -1.55% | +3.77% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $9.82K (-1.8%) started 2025-11-03 | $10.44K (+4.4%) started 2025-11-03 |
| 5Y ago | $22.07K (+120.7%) started 2021-11-03 | $21.12K (+111.2%) started 2021-11-03 |
| 10Y ago | $29.62K (+196.2%) started 2016-11-03 | $26.69K (+166.9%) started 2016-11-03 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.17% | 0.30% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $7.17B | $4.26B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.19 | 0.53 |
| 52-week change | -1.55% | 3.77% |
| Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | -1.55% | +3.77% |
| 6M returni | -12.74% | -30.80% |
| 3M returni | -2.70% | -13.04% |
| 1M returni | -4.87% | -16.73% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -0.08 | 0.33 |
| Betai | 0.19 | 0.53 |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 5Y CAGR | +17.17% | +16.14% |
Over the past year, SGOL and SIVR have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.84), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -1.78% | +4.40% |
| CAGRi | -1.79% | +4.41% | |
| Volatilityi | 28.41% | 62.94% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.08 | 0.33 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.10 | 0.42 | |
| Max drawdowni | 28.13% | 57.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.98% | 56.76% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.31% | 31.30% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 16.06% | 36.21% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.25% | 36.85% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +120.69% | +111.19% |
| CAGRi | +17.17% | +16.14% | |
| Volatilityi | 18.94% | 37.71% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.70 | 0.47 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.98 | 0.64 | |
| Max drawdowni | 28.13% | 57.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.98% | 56.76% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.95% | 14.88% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.73% | 19.98% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.25% | 36.85% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +196.24% | +166.93% |
| CAGRi | +11.48% | +10.32% | |
| Volatilityi | 16.46% | 32.69% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.47 | 0.33 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.66 | 0.45 | |
| Max drawdowni | 28.13% | 57.72% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.98% | 56.76% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 7.08% | 15.85% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.18% | 19.22% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.04% | 28.55% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 12.25% | 36.85% |
| Category | SGOL | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.17% | 0.30% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $7.17B | $4.26B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
- Physical gold backing provides direct precious metal exposure without counterparty risk from gold futures or gold mining stocks
- Swiss vault storage provides geopolitical diversification for investors concerned about gold stored in U.S. jurisdictions
- Gold is the most liquid precious metal with deep global market and universally recognized store of value characteristics
- Physical silver backing provides direct precious metal exposure
- Silver has significant industrial demand from solar panels, EVs, and electronics — providing industrial growth tailwind alongside monetary precious metal properties
- Silver historically moves with more leverage than gold in precious metals bull markets, providing amplified upside during commodity cycles
- Gold ETFs charge annual expenses (management fees) that create a small but persistent drag versus owning physical gold directly
- Gold price performance is driven by real interest rates, U.S. dollar strength, and uncertainty/risk sentiment — all variable and hard to predict
- Competing gold ETFs (GLD, IAU, GLDM) offer similar physical gold exposure — investors should compare expense ratios when selecting among gold ETFs
- Silver is significantly more volatile than gold — industrial demand fluctuations add volatility beyond the typical precious metal inflation/dollar hedge dynamics
- Storage costs for silver are higher relative to gold given silver's lower value density (more storage space needed per dollar of value)
- The gold/silver ratio has historically been volatile — silver can dramatically underperform gold in risk-off environments despite often outperforming in bull markets
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on SGOL and SIVR. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside SGOL and SIVR, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.