LIVE
AVLV
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF · ETF / Factor-Tilted Large Cap Value
$90.95
+4.31% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF · ETF / Large Cap Value Index
$216.50
+4.55% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
AVLV
1
VTV
4
Comparison scoreboard
VTV LEADS 4/5Exp. Ratio
AVLV 0.15%
VTV ✓0.03%
1Y Return
AVLV ✓+38.65%
VTV +27.80%
Div. Yield
AVLV 1.08%
VTV ✓1.88%
AUM
AVLV $12.86B
VTV ✓$245.01B
Beta
AVLV 0.96
VTV ✓0.77
Metrics last refreshed: 6/22/2026
Quick take
AVLV vs VTV Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AVLV and VTV both provide large-cap value exposure but with different construction philosophies. AVLV dynamically targets both value and profitability factors to avoid value traps at 0.15%. VTV provides the simplest, cheapest pure value index exposure at 0.04%. Academic factor research suggests profitability screening (AVLV's approach) captures higher expected returns than pure value alone — but AVLV's 0.11% fee premium requires this advantage to compound meaningfully over time.
AVLV vs VTV — Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (active factor targeting combining low valuation + high profitability to avoid value traps, dynamic weighting at 0.15%) versus Vanguard Value ETF (340+ stock pure large-cap value index at 0.04% with 20+ year track record and maximum simplicity).
Live analysis · updated 6/22/2026
VTV holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. AVLV has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+38.65% vs +27.80% for VTV).
Normalized 1Y performance
AVLV
VTV
Recent returns
AVLV
VTV
Who should consider this stock?
AVLV may suit investors who:
- →believe Fama-French factor research supports combining value and profitability — want the academic evidence base for expected return premium beyond pure value alone
- →are comfortable with active management fee (0.15%) for targeted factor implementation that excludes value traps through profitability screening
- →are long-term factor investors with 10+ year horizons allowing profitability-screened value to compound vs paying the fee premium over shorter periods
- →want the Avantis team's research-informed factor exposure rather than mechanical index construction
VTV may suit investors who:
- →want the cheapest possible large-cap value exposure — 0.04% expense ratio maximizes every basis point of factor return retained by investors
- →prefer simplicity and 20+ year track record over complex factor targeting — VTV's CRSP index methodology is transparent, proven, and broadly adopted
- →are comfortable with broader value exposure including some companies without profitability screening — accepting the full value opportunity set including potential value traps at lower cost
- →are building core allocations where expense ratio minimization over decades compounds more than marginal factor precision improvements
Performance & AI score
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 79.0 | 93.0 |
| Latest close | $90.95 | $216.50 |
| 1M return | +4.31% | +4.55% |
| 6M return | +22.35% | +14.59% |
| 1Y return | +38.65% | +27.80% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.09K (+40.9%) started 2025-06-18 | $13.06K (+30.6%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $20.85K (+108.5%) started 2021-09-23 | $20.61K (+106.1%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $20.85K (+108.5%) started 2021-09-23 | $43.52K (+335.2%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fund characteristics
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $12.86B | $245.01B |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 1.88% |
| Trailing P/E | 19.31 | 21.41 |
| Beta | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| 52-week change | 38.65% | 27.80% |
Risk & fund metrics
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +38.65% | +27.80% |
| 6M return | +22.35% | +14.59% |
| 1M return | +4.31% | +4.55% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Beta | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 1.88% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.76% | +12.66% |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
AVLV max drawdown6.39%
VTV max drawdown6.35%
AVLV max wkly drop3.80%
VTV max wkly drop3.49%
5Y risk snapshot
AVLV max drawdown19.50%
VTV max drawdown17.04%
AVLV max wkly drop13.11%
VTV max wkly drop10.83%
10Y risk snapshot
AVLV max drawdown19.50%
VTV max drawdown36.78%
AVLV max wkly drop13.11%
VTV max wkly drop19.35%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +38.65% | +27.80% |
| CAGR | +38.68% | +27.82% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.33 | 2.00 | |
| Max drawdown | 6.39% | 6.35% | |
| Max daily drop | 2.72% | 1.71% | |
| Max wkly drop | 3.80% | 3.49% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +91.89% | +81.47% |
| CAGR | +14.76% | +12.66% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.62 | 0.61 | |
| Max drawdown | 19.50% | 17.04% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.05% | 5.93% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.11% | 10.83% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +91.89% | +229.46% |
| CAGR | +14.76% | +12.67% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.62 | 0.53 | |
| Max drawdown | 19.50% | 36.78% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.05% | 11.08% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.11% | 19.35% |
Fund overview
| Category | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF | Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $12.86B | $245.01B |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 1.88% |
AVLV strengths
- →Combines value with profitability factor: AVLV avoids value traps (cheap but unprofitable companies) by requiring both low valuation AND high profitability — historically higher returns than pure value exposure
- →Dynamic factor score weighting: AVLV can overweight the cheapest, most profitable stocks vs fixed index weights — potential for stronger factor exposure than rules-based index ETFs
- →Avantis team's academic factor research foundation: led by former Dimensional Fund Advisors researchers — institutional-quality factor implementation at ETF accessibility
VTV strengths
- →0.04% expense ratio: VTV is among the cheapest ETFs available — almost no fee drag on value factor capture over decades
- →340+ stock diversification: VTV's broad value index minimizes single-stock concentration while capturing the full large-cap value opportunity set
- →20+ year track record and Vanguard institutional quality: VTV's long history spans multiple market cycles — investors have real performance data to evaluate
Risks to watch — AVLV
- →Higher expense ratio (0.15%) than VTV (0.04%): active management premium above the cheapest passive value ETF — must deliver sufficient factor return to justify higher cost
- →Factor timing risk: value and profitability factors go through extended underperformance cycles — AVLV requires patience through factor headwind periods
- →Less long track record: AVLV launched in 2021 — limited live performance history vs VTV's 20+ year track record across market cycles
Risks to watch — VTV
- →Pure value without profitability screen includes value traps: VTV holds cheap but potentially unprofitable companies that AVLV excludes — some VTV holdings may be cheap because earnings fundamentals are deteriorating
- →Less precise factor targeting than AVLV: VTV's broad value index captures the value factor but with less precision than AVLV's targeted value + profitability approach
- →Fixed index rebalancing: VTV rebalances on fixed schedules rather than continuously optimizing factor scores — less dynamic factor exposure between rebalance dates
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →