AVLV vs VTV Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AVLV and VTV both provide large-cap value exposure but with different construction philosophies. AVLV dynamically targets both value and profitability factors to avoid value traps at 0.15%. VTV provides the simplest, cheapest pure value index exposure at 0.04%. Academic factor research suggests profitability screening (AVLV's approach) captures higher expected returns than pure value alone — but AVLV's 0.11% fee premium requires this advantage to compound meaningfully over time.
AVLV vs VTV — Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (active factor targeting combining low valuation + high profitability to avoid value traps, dynamic weighting at 0.15%) versus Vanguard Value ETF (340+ stock pure large-cap value index at 0.04% with 20+ year track record and maximum simplicity).
VTV holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. AVLV has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+28.51% vs +21.55% for VTV).
- believe Fama-French factor research supports combining value and profitability — want the academic evidence base for expected return premium beyond pure value alone
- are comfortable with active management fee (0.15%) for targeted factor implementation that excludes value traps through profitability screening
- are long-term factor investors with 10+ year horizons allowing profitability-screened value to compound vs paying the fee premium over shorter periods
- want the Avantis team's research-informed factor exposure rather than mechanical index construction
- want the cheapest possible large-cap value exposure — 0.04% expense ratio maximizes every basis point of factor return retained by investors
- prefer simplicity and 20+ year track record over complex factor targeting — VTV's CRSP index methodology is transparent, proven, and broadly adopted
- are comfortable with broader value exposure including some companies without profitability screening — accepting the full value opportunity set including potential value traps at lower cost
- are building core allocations where expense ratio minimization over decades compounds more than marginal factor precision improvements
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 96.0 | 91.0 |
| Latest closei | $92.06 | $221.25 |
| 1M returni | -2.34% | -2.51% |
| 6M returni | +16.23% | +14.93% |
| 1Y returni | +28.51% | +21.55% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $13.04K (+30.4%) started 2025-09-18 | $12.41K (+24.1%) started 2025-09-18 |
| 5Y ago | $21.21K (+112.1%) started 2021-09-23 | $20.81K (+108.1%) started 2021-09-20 |
| 10Y ago | $21.21K (+112.1%) started 2021-09-23 | $43.41K (+334.1%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $21.57B | $262.3B |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.04% | 1.82% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 17.44 | 20.06 |
| Betai | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| 52-week change | 28.51% | 21.55% |
| Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +28.51% | +21.55% |
| 6M returni | +16.23% | +14.93% |
| 1M returni | -2.34% | -2.51% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.76 | 1.53 |
| Betai | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.04% | 1.82% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.30% | +12.91% |
Over the past year, AVLV and VTV have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.89), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +28.51% | +21.55% |
| CAGRi | +28.53% | +21.57% | |
| Volatilityi | 12.20% | 10.23% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.76 | 1.53 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.66 | 2.31 | |
| Max drawdowni | 6.39% | 6.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.87% | 2.75% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 0.98% | 1.00% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 1.63% | 1.69% | |
| Max daily dropi | 2.72% | 1.71% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 3.80% | 3.49% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +94.71% | +83.38% |
| CAGRi | +14.30% | +12.91% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.00% | 13.77% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.61 | 0.63 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.87 | 0.90 | |
| Max drawdowni | 19.50% | 17.04% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.87% | 2.75% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 3.74% | 3.19% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.48% | 4.65% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.05% | 5.93% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.11% | 10.83% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +94.71% | +229.26% |
| CAGRi | +14.30% | +12.66% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.00% | 16.59% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.61 | 0.53 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.87 | 0.74 | |
| Max drawdowni | 19.50% | 36.78% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.87% | 2.75% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 3.74% | 3.69% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.48% | 5.97% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.05% | 11.08% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 13.11% | 19.35% |
| Category | AVLV | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF | Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $21.57B | $262.3B |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.04% | 1.82% |
- Combines value with profitability factor: AVLV avoids value traps (cheap but unprofitable companies) by requiring both low valuation AND high profitability — historically higher returns than pure value exposure
- Dynamic factor score weighting: AVLV can overweight the cheapest, most profitable stocks vs fixed index weights — potential for stronger factor exposure than rules-based index ETFs
- Avantis team's academic factor research foundation: led by former Dimensional Fund Advisors researchers — institutional-quality factor implementation at ETF accessibility
- 0.04% expense ratio: VTV is among the cheapest ETFs available — almost no fee drag on value factor capture over decades
- 340+ stock diversification: VTV's broad value index minimizes single-stock concentration while capturing the full large-cap value opportunity set
- 20+ year track record and Vanguard institutional quality: VTV's long history spans multiple market cycles — investors have real performance data to evaluate
- Higher expense ratio (0.15%) than VTV (0.04%): active management premium above the cheapest passive value ETF — must deliver sufficient factor return to justify higher cost
- Factor timing risk: value and profitability factors go through extended underperformance cycles — AVLV requires patience through factor headwind periods
- Less long track record: AVLV launched in 2021 — limited live performance history vs VTV's 20+ year track record across market cycles
- Pure value without profitability screen includes value traps: VTV holds cheap but potentially unprofitable companies that AVLV excludes — some VTV holdings may be cheap because earnings fundamentals are deteriorating
- Less precise factor targeting than AVLV: VTV's broad value index captures the value factor but with less precision than AVLV's targeted value + profitability approach
- Fixed index rebalancing: VTV rebalances on fixed schedules rather than continuously optimizing factor scores — less dynamic factor exposure between rebalance dates
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.