VTWO vs IJR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
VTWO and IJR both target small-cap blend exposure but take different paths to get there — VTWO via the Russell 2000 Index, and IJR via the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The practical differences come down to issuer, cost structure, and the specific index rules each fund follows, since both are pursuing a similar investment outcome.
VTWO vs IJR is largely a question of which issuer and index methodology you trust more for small-cap blend exposure — the underlying investment case is similar, so cost, liquidity, and tracking precision tend to be the deciding factors.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- want the low-cost, buy-and-hold version of the small-cap benchmark
- prefer Vanguard's approach and fund lineup
- value significantly cheaper than IWM for the same index exposure
- are comfortable with far less liquid and no meaningful options market versus IWM
- want quality-screened small-cap exposure via the S&P 600
- prefer iShares (BlackRock)'s approach and fund lineup
- value s&P 600's profitability requirement screens out weaker companies
- are comfortable with smaller company count than the Russell 2000
| Metric | VTWO | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | N/A | N/A |
| AI ranki | N/A | N/A |
| Latest closei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | VTWO | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | N/A |
| Target upsidei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | VTWO | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margini | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | VTWO | IJR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A |
| Category | VTWO | IJR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF |
| Sector | ETF | ETF |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | VTWO tracks the identical Russell 2000 Index as IWM but at a much lower cost, appealing to buy-and-hold investors over traders. Issued by Vanguard, it tracks the Russell 2000 Index. | IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600, which unlike the Russell 2000 requires companies to show positive earnings before inclusion. Issued by iShares (BlackRock), it tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. |
| Investor focus | VTWO is built around the low-cost, buy-and-hold version of the small-cap benchmark, appealing to investors who want that specific exposure rather than IJR's approach. | IJR is built around quality-screened small-cap exposure via the S&P 600, appealing to investors who want that specific exposure rather than VTWO's approach. |
- Significantly cheaper than IWM for the same index exposure
- Vanguard's tax-efficient structure
- Ideal for long-term small-cap allocations rather than trading
- S&P 600's profitability requirement screens out weaker companies
- Historically has outperformed the unscreened Russell 2000 over long periods
- Low expense ratio in the iShares Core lineup
- Far less liquid and no meaningful options market versus IWM
- Same inclusion of unprofitable small-caps as any Russell 2000 fund
- Small-caps remain volatile and rate-sensitive
- Smaller company count than the Russell 2000
- Still carries small-cap volatility and cyclicality
- Less name-brand recognition than IWM among traders
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on VTWO and IJR. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside VTWO and IJR, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.