Data as of:
brimindinvest.com / compare / vtwo-vs-ijrLIVE
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF · ETF
N/A
N/A this month
VERSUS
COMPARE
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF · ETF
N/A
N/A this month
Comparison scoreboard
MIXED SETUP
AI Scorei
VTWO N/A
IJR N/A
1Y Returni
VTWO N/A
IJR N/A
Fwd P/Ei
VTWO N/A
IJR N/A
Target Up.i
VTWO N/A
IJR N/A
Op. Margini
VTWO N/A
IJR N/A
Quick take

VTWO vs IJR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

ShareXLinkedInRedditFacebookWhatsApp

VTWO and IJR both target small-cap blend exposure but take different paths to get there — VTWO via the Russell 2000 Index, and IJR via the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The practical differences come down to issuer, cost structure, and the specific index rules each fund follows, since both are pursuing a similar investment outcome.

VTWO vs IJR is largely a question of which issuer and index methodology you trust more for small-cap blend exposure — the underlying investment case is similar, so cost, liquidity, and tracking precision tend to be the deciding factors.

Normalized 1Y performance
VTWO
IJR
Not enough data to chart yet.
Recent returns
VTWO
IJR
Not enough data to chart yet.
Analyst price targets & sentiment

Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.

VTWO
Price target data unavailable
N/A
IJR
Price target data unavailable
N/A
Who should consider this stock?
VTWO may suit investors who:
  • want the low-cost, buy-and-hold version of the small-cap benchmark
  • prefer Vanguard's approach and fund lineup
  • value significantly cheaper than IWM for the same index exposure
  • are comfortable with far less liquid and no meaningful options market versus IWM
IJR may suit investors who:
  • want quality-screened small-cap exposure via the S&P 600
  • prefer iShares (BlackRock)'s approach and fund lineup
  • value s&P 600's profitability requirement screens out weaker companies
  • are comfortable with smaller company count than the Russell 2000
Performance & AI score
Performance & AI score
MetricVTWOIJR
AI scoreiN/AN/A
AI rankiN/AN/A
Latest closeiN/AN/A
Valuation & upside potential
Valuation & upside potential
MetricVTWOIJR
Market capiN/AN/A
Trailing P/EiN/AN/A
Forward P/EiN/AN/A
Price/SalesiN/AN/A
EV/RevenueiN/AN/A
Analyst targetiN/AN/A
Target upsideiN/AN/A
Growth, profitability & risk
Growth, profitability & risk
MetricVTWOIJR
Revenue growthiN/AN/A
Earnings growthiN/AN/A
EPS growthiN/AN/A
FCF marginiN/AN/A
Operating marginiN/AN/A
Profit marginiN/AN/A
ROIC proxyiN/AN/A
Return on equityiN/AN/A
Dividend yieldiN/AN/A
Payout ratioiN/AN/A
Dividend growth streakiN/AN/A
BetaiN/AN/A
Debt/equityiN/AN/A
Current ratioiN/AN/A
Quick ratioiN/AN/A
Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot
VTWO max drawdowniN/A
IJR max drawdowniN/A
VTWO max wkly dropiN/A
IJR max wkly dropiN/A
5Y risk snapshot
VTWO max drawdowniN/A
IJR max drawdowniN/A
VTWO max wkly dropiN/A
IJR max wkly dropiN/A
10Y risk snapshot
VTWO max drawdowniN/A
IJR max drawdowniN/A
VTWO max wkly dropiN/A
IJR max wkly dropiN/A
Performance metrics by period
Performance metrics by period
PeriodMetricVTWOIJR
1YGrowthiN/AN/A
CAGRiN/AN/A
VolatilityiN/AN/A
Sharpe ratioiN/AN/A
Sortino ratioiN/AN/A
Max drawdowniN/AN/A
Current drawdowniN/AN/A
Avg drawdowniN/AN/A
Ulcer IndexiN/AN/A
Max daily dropiN/AN/A
Max wkly dropiN/AN/A
5YGrowthiN/AN/A
CAGRiN/AN/A
VolatilityiN/AN/A
Sharpe ratioiN/AN/A
Sortino ratioiN/AN/A
Max drawdowniN/AN/A
Current drawdowniN/AN/A
Avg drawdowniN/AN/A
Ulcer IndexiN/AN/A
Max daily dropiN/AN/A
Max wkly dropiN/AN/A
10YGrowthiN/AN/A
CAGRiN/AN/A
VolatilityiN/AN/A
Sharpe ratioiN/AN/A
Sortino ratioiN/AN/A
Max drawdowniN/AN/A
Current drawdowniN/AN/A
Avg drawdowniN/AN/A
Ulcer IndexiN/AN/A
Max daily dropiN/AN/A
Max wkly dropiN/AN/A
AI Prediction Signali
Members only
Next 5 trading days
VTWO
+2.8%BUY
IJR
+1.1%HOLD
Next 30 trading days
VTWO
+6.4%BUY
IJR
+3.2%HOLD

Sign up to unlock AI price predictions

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required
Business comparison
Business comparison
CategoryVTWOIJR
CompanyVanguard Russell 2000 ETFiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
SectorETFETF
IndustryN/AN/A
Core businessVTWO tracks the identical Russell 2000 Index as IWM but at a much lower cost, appealing to buy-and-hold investors over traders. Issued by Vanguard, it tracks the Russell 2000 Index.IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600, which unlike the Russell 2000 requires companies to show positive earnings before inclusion. Issued by iShares (BlackRock), it tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
Investor focusVTWO is built around the low-cost, buy-and-hold version of the small-cap benchmark, appealing to investors who want that specific exposure rather than IJR's approach.IJR is built around quality-screened small-cap exposure via the S&P 600, appealing to investors who want that specific exposure rather than VTWO's approach.
VTWO strengths
  • Significantly cheaper than IWM for the same index exposure
  • Vanguard's tax-efficient structure
  • Ideal for long-term small-cap allocations rather than trading
IJR strengths
  • S&P 600's profitability requirement screens out weaker companies
  • Historically has outperformed the unscreened Russell 2000 over long periods
  • Low expense ratio in the iShares Core lineup
Risks to watch — VTWO
  • Far less liquid and no meaningful options market versus IWM
  • Same inclusion of unprofitable small-caps as any Russell 2000 fund
  • Small-caps remain volatile and rate-sensitive
Risks to watch — IJR
  • Smaller company count than the Russell 2000
  • Still carries small-cap volatility and cyclicality
  • Less name-brand recognition than IWM among traders
Frequently asked questions
Neither VTWO nor IJR is universally "better" — VTWO is built for the low-cost, buy-and-hold version of the small-cap benchmark, while IJR is built for quality-screened small-cap exposure via the S&P 600. Investors should pick based on which exposure and cost structure fits their own portfolio goals rather than assuming one strictly dominates the other.
Interactive comparison engine

Compare more than two at a time

This page is a fixed writeup on VTWO and IJR. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.

Up to 5 tickers at once

Add three more names beside VTWO and IJR, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.

Scoreboard verdict

AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.

Full risk suite

Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.

Correlation heatmap

Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.

Valuation vs profitability

A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.

Holdings overlap and CSV export

For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.

Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.

Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons
ShareXLinkedInRedditFacebookWhatsApp