October 12, 2026 · BriMindInvest Research Team · 18 min read
On 9 December, the 180-day cliff on the largest IPO in history releases 11.96 billion shares — roughly 125 days of SpaceX's average trading volume. That single ratio is the only lock-up number worth memorising, and almost no coverage of expiring lock-ups mentions it. This is how to read one properly.
When a company goes public, only a slice of its shares are actually sold into the offering. Everything else — founder stock, employee equity, venture rounds — stays locked. The underwriters require it as a contractual condition, because a flood of insider supply in the first weeks of trading would destroy the offering they just priced.
The standard structure is a 180-day cliff: nothing can be sold for 180 days, and then everything becomes eligible at once. The agreement is written into the prospectus, so the date is public from day one. Across the 75 deals we currently track, structures break down as 67 plain cliffs, 3 “earlier-of” arrangements (whichever of two conditions arrives first), 1 staged release, and 4 we could not classify confidently.
Lock-up terms get amended. Early-release triggers fire when a stock trades above a threshold for a set number of days. Underwriters waive restrictions to accommodate a follow-on offering. SpaceX's own lock-up period has been restated nine times in the filings since the IPO. Reading the original S-1 once and writing the date in your calendar is not sufficient — the live documents are the source of truth.
And the expiry does not permit unlimited selling. Affiliates remain subject to Rule 144 volume limits, and most companies have blackout windows around earnings. “Eligible to sell” is not “free to dump.”
“Insiders” is doing a lot of work in most lock-up coverage. The locked block is not one constituency, and the groups inside it behave completely differently once the restriction lifts. Pricing a lock-up expiry without disaggregating them is the single most common analytical error in this area.
These are funds with a legal obligation to return capital to their own limited partners, and a position that may represent a large share of one fund's entire value. They are the most likely genuine sellers — but they are also the least likely to sell on the open market. A fund holding billions of dollars of stock sells through a registered secondary offering or a block trade negotiated with a bank, because dribbling it into the tape would move the price against itself. That is why a lock-up expiry is often followed by a secondary offering announcement rather than by visible selling pressure, and why the offering is the news, not the expiry.
Usually the least likely to sell in size, for reasons that have nothing to do with sentiment: concentrated stakes, control considerations, signalling risk, and in many cases a separate contractual arrangement that extends well past the standard 180 days. Where they do sell, it is typically through a pre-arranged plan adopted after the lock-up lifts, which is both disclosed and deliberately boring.
The most reliably motivated sellers, individually small and collectively meaningful. Many have most of their net worth in one stock and a tax bill attached to it. Two mechanical features matter here:
Funds that bought the last private round and also hold public equities. Their decision is a relative-value one: they sell if they have better uses for the capital, and hold if the position still clears their bar. The least predictable group, and the one most sensitive to what the stock has done since the IPO.
The practical consequence: absorb days measure the worst case, not the expected case. The expected case depends on the mix. A deal where the locked block is mostly employee equity behaves very differently from one where it is mostly two venture funds at the end of their fund life — even at identical absorb days.
A lock-up is a private contract with the underwriters. Securities law is a separate layer that does not expire with it, and it constrains exactly the holders most people worry about.
Restricted and control securities are resold under Rule 144, which imposes conditions that bite hardest on the largest holders:
Non-affiliates holding for long enough eventually escape most of this. Affiliates do not. So when a headline says twelve billion shares become sellable, a large fraction of that block is in hands that face a volume cap measured against the same average volume the absorb-day calculation uses.
This is the escape hatch, and it is why the volume cap does not end the story. Most pre-IPO investors negotiated registration rights years before the offering: the contractual power to compel the company to register their shares for resale, which moves the sale out of Rule 144 and into a registered offering with no volume cap. A demand right lets a holder force the process; a piggyback right lets them join an offering the company is already doing.
The practical sequence this produces: lock-up lifts → a large holder exercises registration rights → a resale shelf or secondary offering is filed → a block is placed at a negotiated discount to the market price. The discount on that block, not the expiry date, is where the price impact actually shows up.
Company insider-trading policies typically prohibit selling in the weeks before an earnings release. If a lock-up expiry falls inside a blackout, the effective start of insider selling is pushed out to the open window after results — often weeks later than the calendar date everyone is watching. This is a routine reason expiries pass quietly and then supply appears later, and it is why we record the expiry date and the earnings calendar together.
Of our 75 tracked deals, 67 are plain cliffs. The other eight are where the real work is:
SpaceX is a plain cliff, so none of these apply to it. But its period has been restated nine times in the filings, which is the reason we re-read the live documents rather than trusting a date scraped once from the original prospectus.
Headlines report lock-up expiries in share counts or dollar values. Both are close to useless on their own, because they say nothing about whether the market can take the supply. A billion shares unlocking in a stock that trades a billion shares a day is a non-event. Twenty million shares unlocking in a stock that trades two hundred thousand a day is a problem.
That is the whole idea. It converts an unlockable block into a unit the market can be compared against. We bucket the result into three bands and compare each deal against its cohort — the 47 publishable deals in the current window, whose absorb-day distribution runs from a lower cutoff of 53.0 to an upper cutoff of 79.3.
Two caveats we apply to ourselves. Average daily volume for a newly public company is measured over a short, unusually active history, so it tends to overstate the market's steady-state capacity — which means absorb days tend to be understated. And the share count is almost never printed directly; it is derived as shares outstanding after the offering less the shares sold in it. We only publish a deal when we have read the actual prospectus language and the stock clears liquidity minimums of $1M dollar volume over at least 20 sessions.
SpaceX priced at $135 and trades at $162.57, up 20.4% from the offer. Its 180-day cliff lands on 9 December 2026.
Nearly 12 billion shares against 95.8 million of average daily volume gives 124.9 absorb days — firmly in the heavy band, and at the 87th percentile of its cohort. In plain terms: if every unlocked holder wanted out, clearing the block at current volumes would take about half a trading year.
Absorb days measure potential supply, not intent. Three things cut strongly the other way for SpaceX specifically:
Our deal record carries a pressure classification for SPCX, but there is no entry for it in our public call ledger. The reason is purely mechanical: the ledger issues calls on a rolling 30-day horizon, which currently covers expiries from 27 October to 26 November 2026. SpaceX's 9 December date falls outside that window, so no call has been written yet. Expect one to appear in early November, and it will be timestamped and immutable like every other.
SpaceX listed on Nasdaq on 12 June 2026 at $135 a share, in the largest initial public offering ever completed, at a valuation around $1.77 trillion. Count 180 days forward from the listing date and you land on 9 December 2026 — which is exactly the date in the filings. The arithmetic is worth doing yourself, because it is the cleanest possible confirmation that this is a standard cliff and not a bespoke arrangement.
What makes it unusual is not the structure. It is the proportion.
A $1.77 trillion valuation at a $135 offer price implies roughly 13.1 billion shares outstanding. Against that, the 11.96 billion shares unlocking on 9 December represent about 91% of the company. The tradeable float through the first six months has therefore been on the order of 1.1 to 1.2 billion shares — under 9% of the shares outstanding.
That is the real story of this expiry. It is not that a large block is unlocking; large blocks unlock constantly. It is that the quantity becoming eligible is roughly ten times the entire float the market has been pricing against since June.
Run the same figures the other way and the liquidity picture looks far less alarming. Average daily volume of 95.8 million shares against a float of roughly 1.15 billion means something close to 8% of the float changes hands every single session. By the standard of newly public companies that is extraordinarily active trading, and it is why the dollar volume reaches $15.6 billion a day despite the small float.
We are not resolving that disagreement here, and we would be inventing confidence if we tried. What we will say is which of the two the structure favours: the affiliate volume cap and the registration-rights pathway described above mean that if the bearish case plays out, it will arrive as a priced secondary offering rather than as open-market selling. Watch the filing calendar, not the tape.
Most of the work in lock-up tracking is throwing things away. The funnel for the current window:
Of 283 issuers identified, 178 are withheld — because the prospectus language was ambiguous, the share count could not be derived reliably, or the stock failed the liquidity floor. Withholding is the normal outcome. A lock-up tracker that confidently reports a number for every IPO is guessing on most of them.
Roughly one IPO in six that enters this funnel comes out with a number we are willing to print. If that seems like a low hit rate, it is the point. The 178 withheld deals are the ones where a published absorb-day figure would have been a guess dressed as a measurement.
Anyone can describe a lock-up expiry after the fact. The only way to know whether a framework works is to write down the call before the date, freeze it, and then grade it against a benchmark you did not choose afterwards. That is what the scoreboard is for, and here is exactly how it is specified.
We would rather tell you this directly than have you find it. As of 12 October 2026 the ledger holds 10 calls and therefore 20 legs. All 20 legs are pending. Zero are resolved. The hit rate is null.
The reason is simply that the calls were issued on a rolling 30-day horizon covering expiries from 27 October to 26 November, and the first of those dates has not arrived yet. The 5-day legs cannot resolve before early November and the 21-day legs cannot resolve before December.
So treat everything in this article as a framework with a stated methodology and no track record yet. The absorb-day arithmetic is just arithmetic and it is sound. Whether our band thresholds and our calls carry predictive value is an open question that the next two months will begin to answer, and the answer will be published whichever way it goes.
One more honesty note on the thresholds themselves. The light, middle and heavy cutoffs are cohort-relative — derived from the distribution of the current 47 publishable deals, with a lower cutoff at 53.0 absorb days and an upper at 79.3. They are not absolute constants discovered in historical data. As the cohort changes, the cutoffs move. This makes the bands a reasonable way to say “heavy relative to comparable deals right now,” and an unreasonable way to say “heavy in some universal sense.”
SpaceX is the headline, but 45 expiries are scheduled ahead. The next several weeks, with absorb days:
| Expiry | Ticker | Shares | Absorb days | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | ARXS | 23M | 19.0 | light |
| 2026-10-14 | ALMR | 55M | 77.3 | middle |
| 2026-10-14 | KLRA | 85M | 55.7 | middle |
| 2026-10-17 | AVEX | 96M | 69.7 | middle |
| 2026-10-20 | ELMT | 20M | 13.8 | light |
| 2026-10-24 | XE | 348M | 53.0 | light |
| 2026-10-27 | AVLN | 25M | 71.9 | middle |
| 2026-10-28 | SPTX | 39M | 120.0 | heavy |
| 2026-11-03 | HAWK | 77M | 55.8 | middle |
XE illustrates why share counts mislead. It unlocks 348 million shares — the largest block in this list by a wide margin — and still sits in the light band at 53.0 absorb days, because it trades enough volume to take it. SPTX unlocks 39 million, a ninth as many, and lands at 120 absorb days. Rank by absorb days, never by share count.
We write each call before the expiry, store it in an append-only ledger, and grade it afterwards against SPY at 5 and 21 trading days. Calls are frozen at the moment they are issued, which is why a call's absorb-day figure can differ from the live deal record — volume keeps moving, the call does not.
| Ticker | Expiry | Structure | Lead days | Absorb days | Band | Call |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALMR | 2026-10-14 | cliff | 17 | 128.6 | heavy | Pressure |
| ARXS | 2026-10-13 | cliff | 16 | 26.8 | light | Absorbed |
| ELMT | 2026-10-20 | cliff | 23 | 16.0 | light | Absorbed |
| XE | 2026-10-24 | earlier-of | 27 | 46.8 | light | Absorbed |
| AVLN | 2026-10-27 | cliff | 30 | 98.9 | heavy | Pressure |
| SPTX | 2026-10-28 | cliff | 31 | 147.2 | heavy | Pressure |
| SUJA | 2026-11-04 | cliff | 23 | 95.9 | heavy | Pressure |
| CBRS | 2026-11-10 | staged | 44 | 36.5 | light | Absorbed |
| FRVO | 2026-11-10 | cliff | 44 | 25.1 | light | Absorbed |
| GMRS | 2026-11-10 | cliff | 44 | 20.9 | light | Absorbed |
Four pressure calls, six absorbed, each issued between 16 and 44 days before the event. The naive baseline we grade against is “every unlock gets absorbed, no exceptions” — which, across these ten, would have called all ten absorbed. Our four pressure calls are therefore the entire bet: if the unlocks at ALMR, AVLN, SPTX and SUJA sail through without underperforming SPY, we were worse than doing nothing.
We want to be unambiguous about what the scoreboard currently says: zero resolved legs and twenty pending. The hit rate is null because not a single call has come due yet. We have no measured accuracy to report, and anyone showing you a lock-up track record built in the last month does not either.
What we do have is a falsifiable commitment: ten dated calls, published before the fact, graded automatically against a benchmark and a baseline that is deliberately hard to beat. In a few months the scoreboard will say whether the method works. If it does not, it will say that too.
Our lock-up radar reads IPO prospectuses directly from SEC filings, derives the unlocking share count, computes absorb days against live volume, and ranks every tracked deal against its cohort — with the prospectus language quoted so you can check the derivation yourself.
The public call ledger and its scoreboard sit alongside it, including the calls that have not resolved yet.
SpaceX releases 11.96 billion shares on 9 December 2026 — about 125 days of average volume, in the heavy band, at the 87th percentile of its cohort. That is a large potential supply event in an extremely liquid stock whose date everybody has known since the prospectus.
Absorb days is the metric. Share counts and dollar values are noise without the volume denominator, which is why XE can unlock nine times more shares than SPTX and present a third of the pressure.
And we have no track record to sell you. Ten calls are on the board, twenty legs are pending, zero have resolved. The scoreboard will answer the question on its own schedule.
All figures as of 12 October 2026. Volume as of 9 October 2026. Calls are frozen at issue and are not revised.
Get AI prediction signals, unlimited stock comparisons, portfolio analytics, and personalized watchlists — free for 14 days, no credit card required.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime
Not ready to sign up? Get one free email a week instead.