AGG vs BND Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
AGG (iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are functionally interchangeable core investment-grade bond ETFs — both track essentially the same Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index composition, both charge 0.03% expense ratios, both have similar interest rate duration (~6-7 years), and both provide the same diversified exposure to U.S. Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities, and investment-grade corporate bonds. The practical choice between AGG and BND is almost entirely a matter of brokerage preference (AGG for iShares/BlackRock ecosystem users, BND for Vanguard users).
AGG vs BND is two nearly identical core U.S. investment-grade bond ETFs at identical cost — iShares/BlackRock's AGG with slightly higher AUM and trading liquidity versus Vanguard's BND with the investor-owned governance structure alignment and three-fund portfolio integration — effectively the same product in two different packaging.
AGG holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. AGG has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+2.71% vs +2.64% for BND).
- →Use iShares ETFs across their portfolio (AGG, IVV, IEFA) and prefer BlackRock's iShares ecosystem for portfolio consistency or advisor-managed accounts that default to iShares products
- →Need maximum bond ETF liquidity for large institutional trades or frequent rebalancing — AGG's slightly higher trading volume provides marginally tighter bid-ask spreads for large transactions
- →Invest through a brokerage where AGG is commission-free or has lower transaction costs than BND
- →Build a Vanguard three-fund portfolio (VTI + VXUS + BND) as the classic bond allocation component — BND pairs naturally with VTI and VXUS for a complete, low-cost diversified portfolio
- →Value Vanguard's investor-owned structure as providing long-term governance alignment toward cost minimization that a profit-driven asset manager cannot structurally match
- →Invest at Vanguard brokerage where BND is commission-free and integrates with Vanguard's portfolio analysis and tax-loss harvesting tools
| Metric | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 57.0 | 49.0 |
| Latest close | $97.03 | $71.98 |
| 1M return | -1.15% | -1.14% |
| 6M return | -0.83% | -0.79% |
| 1Y return | +2.71% | +2.64% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.69K (+6.9%) started 2025-07-31 | $10.68K (+6.8%) started 2025-07-31 |
| 5Y ago | $11.63K (+16.3%) started 2021-08-02 | $11.65K (+16.5%) started 2021-08-02 |
| 10Y ago | $15.86K (+58.6%) started 2016-08-01 | $16.26K (+62.6%) started 2016-08-01 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $138.85B | $397.86B |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.95% |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| 52-week change | 2.71% | 2.64% |
| Metric | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +2.71% | +2.64% |
| 6M return | -0.83% | -0.79% |
| 1M return | -1.15% | -1.14% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -0.46 | -0.49 |
| Beta | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.95% |
| 5Y CAGR | -0.44% | -0.47% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +2.71% | +2.64% |
| CAGR | +2.72% | +2.64% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.46 | -0.49 | |
| Max drawdown | 2.76% | 2.68% | |
| Max daily drop | 0.83% | 0.80% | |
| Max wkly drop | 1.17% | 1.10% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -2.18% | -2.34% |
| CAGR | -0.44% | -0.47% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.78 | -0.80 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.82% | 17.91% | |
| Max daily drop | 1.64% | 1.62% | |
| Max wkly drop | 3.48% | 3.50% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +14.47% | +15.10% |
| CAGR | +1.36% | +1.42% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.55 | -0.53 | |
| Max drawdown | 18.43% | 18.58% | |
| Max daily drop | 4.00% | 5.44% | |
| Max wkly drop | 7.10% | 8.05% |
| Category | AGG | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bon | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $138.85B | $397.86B |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.95% |
- →Comprehensive investment-grade bond market exposure in one ETF — AGG provides diversified exposure to the entire U.S. investment-grade bond market including Treasuries, MBS, and corporate bonds in proportions matching the overall market
- →High liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads — AGG trades billions of dollars daily with institutional trading activity; this liquidity enables large institutional purchases and sales without significant price impact
- →iShares brand and BlackRock's fixed income expertise — BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager with extensive fixed income portfolio management experience and extensive securities lending that can minimize AGG's net cost
- →Vanguard investor-owned structure drives persistent cost minimization — Vanguard's unique structure creates structural incentive to keep costs low forever, not just when competing with BlackRock; this alignment between fund manager and investor interests is a long-term governance advantage
- →Nearly identical portfolio to AGG with equivalent cost — BND and AGG are practically interchangeable; both track Bloomberg Aggregate variations at 0.03%; the choice is primarily about fund family preference
- →Massive scale enabling low transaction costs — BND's $300B+ in combined assets provides Vanguard negotiating leverage for bond trading transaction costs and enables efficient portfolio management
- →Duration risk — AGG's ~6-7 year duration means a 1% rise in interest rates causes approximately 6-7% price decline; investors holding AGG in a rising rate environment experience mark-to-market losses that recover only as the portfolio rolls to higher-yielding bonds over time
- →Mortgage-backed securities complexity — AGG's ~27% MBS allocation introduces prepayment risk (homeowners refinance when rates fall, reducing MBS duration just when investors want longer duration) and credit exposure to government-sponsored enterprises
- →Corporate bond credit risk — AGG's investment-grade corporate bond allocation (~24%) can underperform in credit stress periods when corporate bond spreads widen
- →Duration risk is identical to AGG — BND's ~6-7 year duration creates the same interest rate sensitivity as AGG; rising rates cause temporary mark-to-market losses that recover over the duration period
- →Float-adjusted index creates minor portfolio differences from AGG — BND's Bloomberg Float Adjusted benchmark versus AGG's Bloomberg Aggregate creates very minor composition differences primarily in Treasury holdings; practically irrelevant for most investors
- →Bond market liquidity in stress periods — in market stress events (COVID March 2020, October 2023 rate spike), even high-quality bond ETFs like AGG and BND can see bid-ask spreads widen and brief premiums/discounts to NAV
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.