BNDW vs BND Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BNDW and BND sit in related but distinct corners of the ETF landscape — BNDW centers on one-fund exposure to global investment-grade bonds, US and international, while BND focuses on the default core US investment-grade bond holding. Investors choosing between them should weigh how each fund's strategy lines up with their own goals rather than assuming they're interchangeable.
Choosing between BNDW and BND comes down to which specific exposure — one-fund exposure to global investment-grade bonds, US and international or the default core US investment-grade bond holding — better matches the role you want this holding to play in a diversified portfolio.
BND holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BND has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-0.86% vs -0.87% for BNDW).
- want one-fund exposure to global investment-grade bonds, US and international
- prefer Vanguard's approach and fund lineup
- value single holding for global bond diversification
- are comfortable with international bond sleeve is currency-hedged, adding a layer of complexity
- want the default core US investment-grade bond holding
- prefer Vanguard's approach and fund lineup
- value broad diversification across Treasuries, agencies, and corporates
- are comfortable with duration risk means the fund loses value when rates rise
| Metric | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 23.8 | 24.4 |
| Latest closei | $66.66 | $71.20 |
| 1M returni | +1.38% | +1.80% |
| 3M returni | -1.28% | -1.37% |
| 6M returni | -0.90% | -1.44% |
| 1Y returni | -0.87% | -0.86% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.32K (+3.2%) started 2025-11-03 | $10.29K (+2.9%) started 2025-11-03 |
| 5Y ago | $12K (+20.0%) started 2021-11-04 | $11.68K (+16.8%) started 2021-11-04 |
| 10Y ago | $15.04K (+50.4%) started 2018-09-06 | $16.2K (+62.0%) started 2016-11-04 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.9B | $389.05B |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.41% | 4.17% |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| 52-week change | -0.87% | -0.86% |
| Metric | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | -0.87% | -0.86% |
| 6M returni | -0.90% | -1.44% |
| 3M returni | -1.28% | -1.37% |
| 1M returni | +1.38% | +1.80% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -1.47 | -1.33 |
| Betai | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.41% | 4.17% |
| 5Y CAGR | -0.14% | -0.42% |
Over the past year, BNDW and BND have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.95), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -0.87% | -0.86% |
| CAGRi | -0.87% | -0.86% | |
| Volatilityi | 3.62% | 3.96% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.47 | -1.33 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.88 | -1.74 | |
| Max drawdowni | 4.12% | 4.83% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.72% | 3.04% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 1.45% | 1.48% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 1.80% | 1.88% | |
| Max daily dropi | 0.76% | 0.84% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 1.29% | 1.65% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -0.68% | -2.09% |
| CAGRi | -0.14% | -0.42% | |
| Volatilityi | 5.26% | 6.07% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.86 | -0.78 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -1.17 | -1.06 | |
| Max drawdowni | 16.24% | 17.38% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.72% | 3.04% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.40% | 7.31% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 7.80% | 8.64% | |
| Max daily dropi | 1.56% | 1.62% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 3.39% | 3.50% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +13.67% | +15.00% |
| CAGRi | +1.58% | +1.41% | |
| Volatilityi | 4.85% | 5.56% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.58 | -0.53 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.77 | -0.71 | |
| Max drawdowni | 17.21% | 18.58% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.72% | 3.86% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 4.83% | 4.95% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 6.80% | 7.00% | |
| Max daily dropi | 3.60% | 5.44% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 5.04% | 8.05% |
| Category | BNDW | BND |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.9B | $389.05B |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.41% | 4.17% |
- Single holding for global bond diversification
- Combines US and international bonds without needing two funds
- Vanguard's low-cost, tax-efficient bond indexing
- Broad diversification across Treasuries, agencies, and corporates
- Very low expense ratio for core bond exposure
- Massive scale and liquidity
- International bond sleeve is currency-hedged, adding a layer of complexity
- Diluted concentration means less control over duration or credit exposure
- Lower yield than credit-focused or high-yield bond funds
- Duration risk means the fund loses value when rates rise
- Lower yield than credit-focused or high-yield alternatives
- No international bond exposure on its own
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on BNDW and BND. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside BNDW and BND, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.