XLP vs VDC Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
XLP and VDC are nearly identical consumer staples ETFs with slightly different scope. XLP holds S&P 500 consumer staples large-caps only (~37 stocks) at 0.09%. VDC holds broader US consumer staples including small/mid-caps (100+ stocks) at 0.10%. Performance differences are minimal — both are dominated by P&G, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Walmart. Choose XLP for liquidity; VDC for completeness. Both are core defensive portfolio building blocks.
XLP vs VDC — Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR (S&P 500 large-cap consumer staples with 37 holdings including P&G, Coke, Pepsi at 0.09%) versus Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (total market consumer staples with 100+ holdings including small/mid-caps at 0.10%).
XLP holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. XLP has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+6.43% vs +6.38% for VDC).
- →want the most liquid consumer staples ETF for tactical defensive positioning or options strategies
- →value S&P 500 large-cap quality filter ensuring only proven large-cap brands with long dividend histories
- →prefer 0.09% expense ratio and tightest bid-ask spreads for tactical market positions
- →are comfortable with concentrated top-4 holdings and excluding smaller consumer staples companies
- →want the broadest US consumer staples market coverage including specialty and natural food companies outside the S&P 500
- →prefer Vanguard's total market index methodology for buy-and-hold positions representing the full consumer staples opportunity set
- →value slightly broader diversification beyond the top-4 concentration in XLP
- →are comfortable with slightly lower liquidity and 0.10% expense ratio vs XLP's 0.09%
| Metric | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 43.0 | 42.0 |
| Latest close | $83.30 | $226.11 |
| 1M return | -3.24% | -3.68% |
| 6M return | +6.01% | +5.50% |
| 1Y return | +6.43% | +6.38% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.94K (+9.4%) started 2025-06-18 | $10.88K (+8.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $15.88K (+58.8%) started 2021-06-18 | $16.14K (+61.4%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $27.16K (+171.6%) started 2016-06-20 | $27.84K (+178.4%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.09% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $14.86B | $9.1B |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 2.15% |
| Trailing P/E | 25.07 | 25.13 |
| Beta | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| 52-week change | 6.43% | 6.38% |
| Metric | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +6.43% | +6.38% |
| 6M return | +6.01% | +5.50% |
| 1M return | -3.24% | -3.68% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Beta | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 2.15% |
| 5Y CAGR | +6.67% | +7.29% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +6.43% | +6.38% |
| CAGR | +6.44% | +6.38% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| Max drawdown | 9.69% | 9.28% | |
| Max daily drop | 2.43% | 2.38% | |
| Max wkly drop | 4.70% | 4.67% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +38.11% | +42.14% |
| CAGR | +6.67% | +7.29% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.22 | 0.26 | |
| Max drawdown | 16.30% | 16.55% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.43% | 6.27% | |
| Max wkly drop | 8.12% | 8.20% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +101.71% | +110.08% |
| CAGR | +7.27% | +7.71% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.25 | 0.27 | |
| Max drawdown | 24.51% | 25.31% | |
| Max daily drop | 9.40% | 9.34% | |
| Max wkly drop | 15.90% | 16.19% |
| Category | XLP | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.09% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $14.86B | $9.1B |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 2.15% |
- →S&P 500 large-cap quality: XLP holds only proven large-cap consumer staples brands with long dividend histories and strong balance sheets
- →Highly liquid and low cost: XLP's 0.09% expense ratio and tight bid-ask spreads make it the most accessible consumer staples sector ETF
- →Pure defensive positioning: consumer staples companies sell essential products (food, beverages, household products) that consumers buy regardless of economic conditions
- →100+ holdings vs XLP's 37: VDC provides broader consumer staples coverage including smaller specialty brands and natural food companies
- →Slightly lower Walmart concentration: VDC's broader holdings slightly dilute Walmart's outsized impact vs XLP
- →Vanguard's total market methodology: capturing the full consumer staples market rather than only S&P 500 eligible companies
- →Walmart size relative to 'consumer staples': Walmart is classified as Consumer Staples but is really a retail conglomerate — Walmart's valuation premium and retail operations create different characteristics than a pure staples brand company
- →Concentration in P&G, Coke, Pepsi: top 4 holdings represent 40%+ of XLP — not as diversified as holding count implies
- →Limited small/mid-cap consumer staples: XLP excludes smaller natural and organic food brands that may offer higher growth than legacy food companies
- →Lower liquidity than XLP: VDC trades less than XLP — slightly wider bid-ask spreads for short-term tactical use
- →Similar performance to XLP historically: the large-cap overlap means VDC and XLP have very similar returns — the extra diversification rarely creates meaningful performance difference
- →Small-cap consumer staples are more obscure: the additional holdings in VDC are smaller, less-known brands that may have more company-specific risk than XLP's proven blue-chip holdings
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.