What is supply chain execution vs. supply chain planning software?

Supply chain planning: planning software helps companies decide what to produce, where to store it, how much inventory to hold, and when to replenish; examples include demand forecasting, inventory optimization, production planning, and supply chain network design; major planning vendors include Blue Yonder (formerly JDA), Kinaxis, o9 Solutions, and SAP IBP; planning software outputs are typically plans, schedules, and recommendations that are fed into execution systems. Supply chain execution: execution software manages the physical movement of goods in real time — warehouses, transportation, yard management, and order fulfillment; execution software must handle high transaction volumes (millions of inventory movements per day in a large DC), real-time decision-making (which picker should get which order right now?), and integration with physical automation (conveyors, robots, sorters); execution requires much tighter operational coupling than planning. Manhattan's positioning: Manhattan Associates focuses exclusively on execution (WMS, TMS, omnichannel) — it does not compete in planning software; this focused positioning means Manhattan's platform is more deeply optimized for execution than broad vendors like SAP or Oracle who offer both planning and execution; specialized execution vendors (Manhattan, HighJump/Korber, Blue Yonder WMS) typically win against generalist ERP WMS modules in complex, high-volume environments.

What is Aspen Technology's role in industrial process optimization?

AspenTech's problem: industrial facilities (oil refineries, chemical plants, pharmaceutical manufacturers, mining operations) consist of extremely complex networks of reactors, distillation columns, heat exchangers, compressors, and separation units; the optimal operating point for these systems depends on hundreds of variables (feed quality, temperatures, pressures, product specifications, energy prices, market demands) that change continuously; even experienced process engineers cannot manually optimize these complex systems; AspenTech's software continuously calculates the optimal operating point and recommends (or automatically implements) adjustments. Key products: Aspen Plus and Aspen HYSYS (process simulation — modeling how chemical plants behave under different operating conditions); Aspen DMCplus (advanced process control — real-time feedback control that keeps plants at optimal operating conditions); Aspen PIMS (production planning — optimizing which crude oils to purchase and how to process them across a refinery); Aspen InfoPlus.21 (operational data historian — storing real-time plant sensor data for analysis). Economic value: AspenTech claims its software delivers $1-2 per barrel of oil processed in economic benefit for refineries through improved yields, energy efficiency, and throughput; for a 200,000 barrel/day refinery, this is $200,000-400,000 per day in value — $70-140 million per year; with an AspenTech software subscription of $5-10 million per year, the ROI is 10-15x; this dramatic ROI is why customers pay for and renew AspenTech software.

How is Manhattan Associates transitioning from perpetual licenses to cloud subscriptions?

Legacy model: historically, enterprise software like WMS was sold as perpetual licenses — a large upfront payment (often several million dollars) for the right to use the software forever, plus annual maintenance fees (15-20% of the license fee) for ongoing support and updates; this created lumpy, front-loaded revenue recognition that didn't reflect the ongoing value delivered. Cloud/SaaS transition: Manhattan's 'Active' platform is sold as cloud subscriptions — customers pay annually (or multi-year) for software-as-a-service hosted by Manhattan in the cloud; the subscription includes all software updates (continuous deployment), hosting, security, and support; revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription term (smoothing revenue recognition). Benefits of the transition: more predictable, recurring revenue (ARR growth is more forecastable than lumpy perpetual license deals); continuous software updates mean the cloud product is always current (eliminating the multi-year implementation cycles required for major on-premise upgrades); Manhattan can serve more customers with the same support resources in cloud vs. managing thousands of disparate on-premise installations. Transition metrics: investors track Manhattan's cloud subscription revenue growth vs. legacy license revenue; the transition mix shift drives total revenue growth even as legacy license revenue declines; RPO (remaining performance obligation — value of future contracted subscription revenue not yet recognized) indicates future revenue visibility. Status: Manhattan completed the cloud transition substantially by 2022-2023; cloud subscriptions now represent the majority of new bookings; legacy on-premise customers are being migrated or renewing onto cloud; the transition has largely created a predictable SaaS revenue model.

Data as of: October 17, 2026

brimindinvest.com / compare / hock-vs-manhLIVE

MANH

Manhattan Associates, Inc. · Technology - Supply Chain Software

$222.17

+4.78% this month

VERSUS

COMPARE

AZPN

Aspen Technology, Inc. · Technology - Industrial Software / Process Optimization

N/A

N/A this month

Comparison scoreboard

MIXED SETUP

AI Scorei

MANH 43.7

AZPN N/A

1Y Returni

MANH +11.19%

AZPN N/A

Fwd P/Ei

MANH 35.29

AZPN N/A

Target Up.i

MANH -1.23%

AZPN N/A

Op. Margini

MANH 25.01%

AZPN N/A

Metrics last refreshed: 10/17/2026

Quick take

MANH vs Supply Chain Software Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

ShareX LinkedIn Reddit Facebook WhatsApp

MANH (Manhattan Associates) and AZPN (Aspen Technology) are both enterprise software leaders with exceptionally high switching costs in their respective industrial niches — Manhattan Associates is the dominant supply chain execution software platform (WMS, TMS) serving retailers and 3PLs with a cloud-native Active platform, while Aspen Technology provides mission-critical process optimization software for refineries, chemical plants, and pharmaceutical manufacturers with Emerson Electric as controlling shareholder.

MANH vs supply chain/industrial software is the dominant supply chain execution platform with 20+ Gartner WMS leadership years and omnichannel fulfillment necessity (Manhattan Associates' cloud-native Active WMS/TMS, retailer and 3PL customer base, and switching cost-driven renewal rates — sustaining premium software multiples on strong subscription revenue growth) versus industrial process optimization with extreme switching costs in energy and chemicals (Aspen Technology's 35+ year refinery/petrochemical customer relationships, Emerson parent's industrial distribution, and energy transition optimization demand — Emerson majority control limiting minority shareholder strategic flexibility).

Live analysis · updated 10/17/2026

MANH and AZPN are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly.

Normalized 1Y performance

MANH

AZPN

Not enough data to chart yet.

Recent returns

MANH

AZPN

Analyst price targets & sentiment

Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.

MANH

Price target range

analyst mean$213.90
current price$222.17

-1.2% upside to analyst mean

AZPN

Price target data unavailable

N/A

Who should consider this stock?

MANH may suit investors who:

Want the dominant supply chain execution software platform with exceptional switching costs driven by deep WMS implementations that cost $10-50M+ and 18-36 months to deploy
Value Manhattan's 20+ consecutive Gartner WMS Magic Quadrant leadership as the most defensible enterprise software moat in the supply chain execution category
Believe e-commerce and omnichannel fulfillment complexity will continue driving retailer and 3PL WMS upgrade cycles that sustain Manhattan's double-digit revenue growth

AZPN may suit investors who:

Want industrial software exposure with 35+ year customer relationships in refineries and chemical plants where switching costs are essentially prohibitive
Value Emerson Electric's controlling ownership as providing financial stability and industrial customer cross-selling that accelerates AspenTech's market reach
Believe the energy transition (hydrogen, sustainable fuels, electrification) will increase process optimization complexity and drive new AspenTech adoption in novel industrial processes

Performance & AI score

Performance & AI score
Metric	MANH	AZPN
AI scorei	43.7	N/A
AI ranki	#808	N/A
Latest closei	$222.17	N/A

$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)

How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?

$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
Period	MANH	AZPN
1Y ago	$11.51K (+15.1%) started 2025-10-16	N/A
5Y ago	$13.31K (+33.1%) started 2021-10-18	N/A
10Y ago	$38.37K (+283.7%) started 2016-10-17	N/A

Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.

Valuation & upside potential

Valuation & upside potential
Metric	MANH	AZPN
Market capi	$12.63B	N/A
Trailing P/Ei	62.23	N/A
Forward P/Ei	35.29	N/A
Price/Salesi	N/A	14.84
EV/Revenuei	11.08	N/A
Analyst targeti	$213.90	N/A
Target upsidei	-1.23%	N/A

Growth, profitability & risk

Growth, profitability & risk
Metric	MANH	AZPN
Revenue growthi	9.30%	N/A
Earnings growthi	-8.60%	N/A
EPS growthi	-8.60%	N/A
FCF margini	+28.51%	N/A
Operating margini	25.01%	N/A
Profit margini	18.67%	N/A
ROIC proxyi	96.38%	N/A
Return on equityi	96.38%	N/A
Dividend yieldi	N/A	N/A
Payout ratioi	0.00%	N/A
Dividend growth streaki	N/A	N/A
Betai	0.93	0.56
Debt/equityi	34.21	N/A
Current ratioi	0.98	N/A
Quick ratioi	0.85	N/A

Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot

MANH max drawdowni40.94%

AZPN max drawdowniN/A

MANH max wkly dropi20.08%

AZPN max wkly dropiN/A

5Y risk snapshot

MANH max drawdowni60.98%

AZPN max drawdowniN/A

MANH max wkly dropi33.41%

AZPN max wkly dropiN/A

10Y risk snapshot

MANH max drawdowni60.98%

AZPN max drawdowniN/A

MANH max wkly dropi41.55%

AZPN max wkly dropiN/A

Performance metrics by period

Performance metrics by period
Period	Metric	MANH	AZPN
1Y	Growthi	+15.09%	N/A
	CAGRi	+15.11%	N/A
	Volatilityi	47.10%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	0.44	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	0.66	N/A
	Max drawdowni	40.94%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	2.11%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	20.01%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	23.23%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	9.99%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	20.08%	N/A
5Y	Growthi	+33.12%	N/A
	CAGRi	+5.90%	N/A
	Volatilityi	40.14%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	0.23	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	0.33	N/A
	Max drawdowni	60.98%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	28.28%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	24.86%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	30.19%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	24.49%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	33.41%	N/A
10Y	Growthi	+283.71%	N/A
	CAGRi	+14.40%	N/A
	Volatilityi	40.45%	N/A
	Sharpe ratioi	0.43	N/A
	Sortino ratioi	0.61	N/A
	Max drawdowni	60.98%	N/A
	Current drawdowni	28.28%	N/A
	Avg drawdowni	19.19%	N/A
	Ulcer Indexi	24.44%	N/A
	Max daily dropi	24.49%	N/A
	Max wkly dropi	41.55%	N/A

AI Prediction Signali

Members only

Next 5 trading days

MANH

+2.8%BUY

AZPN

+1.1%HOLD

Next 30 trading days

MANH

+6.4%BUY

AZPN

+3.2%HOLD

Start Free Trial Log in

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required

Business comparison

Business comparison
Category	MANH	AZPN
Company	Manhattan Associates, Inc.	Aspen Technology, Inc.
Sector	Technology	Technology - Industrial Software / Process Optimization
Industry	Software - Application	N/A
Core business	Manhattan Associates develops and sells supply chain execution software — the systems that orchestrate physical inventory movement through warehouses, distribution centers, and transportation networks. Manhattan's primary products include Manhattan Active Warehouse Management (WMS, considered the market leader), Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS), and Manhattan Active Omni (unified commerce for retailers). Manhattan's Cloud-native 'Active' platform replaces traditional on-premise WMS/TMS implementations with a continuously updated SaaS subscription model. Manhattan serves major global retailers (PVH, Dollar Tree, Ralph Lauren), consumer goods companies, and 3PL operators. Manhattan is recognized as a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for WMS and TMS for 20+ consecutive years.	Aspen Technology (AspenTech) develops software for asset optimization in energy, chemicals, and engineering industries — serving refineries, petrochemical plants, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and mining companies with simulation, planning, scheduling, and quality control software. AspenTech's products help industrial companies optimize production processes, reduce energy consumption, improve safety compliance, and maximize asset utilization. AspenTech became a publicly traded company after Emerson Electric completed a major transaction — combining its industrial software assets with AspenTech's existing software business in 2022, making Emerson the controlling shareholder. AspenTech's software is deeply embedded in the operational workflows of refineries and chemical plants globally.
Investor focus	Investors track Manhattan's cloud subscription revenue growth (transition from legacy perpetual licenses to SaaS), total revenue growth, RPO (remaining performance obligation, representing future contracted revenue), and EBIT margin (consistently excellent for an enterprise software company).	Investors track AspenTech's Annual Contract Value (ACV, subscription revenue base), renewal rates (very high given mission-critical nature of the software), and operating margin improvement under Emerson's operational discipline.

MANH strengths

20+ consecutive years as Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader in WMS demonstrates sustained product leadership — Manhattan's WMS is the most recognized and widely adopted enterprise warehouse management platform globally; Gartner quadrant leadership serves as a key selection criterion for large enterprise buyers evaluating WMS vendors
Cloud-native Active platform creates continuous improvement and switching cost advantages — Manhattan's cloud platform is continuously updated; customers on Manhattan Active automatically receive improvements; after implementation (18-36 months, costing $10-50M+), customers almost never switch WMS vendors due to retraining cost, operational disruption, and implementation investment
E-commerce and omnichannel fulfillment complexity drives demand for sophisticated WMS solutions — the shift to omnichannel retail (ship from store, buy online pick up in store, same-day delivery) dramatically increased warehouse and fulfillment complexity; sophisticated WMS is essential for managing this complexity; Manhattan's customers need Manhattan's capabilities to execute modern commerce

AZPN strengths

Mission-critical process optimization software with 35+ year customer relationships creates extremely high switching costs — refineries and chemical plants design their production workflows around AspenTech simulation and planning tools; ripping out AspenTech to replace with a competitor would require re-engineering core processes and retraining operations engineers — an enormous disruption
Energy transition creates new demand for optimization software — as industrial facilities shift to renewable energy, hydrogen, and lower-carbon processes, the optimization complexity increases; AspenTech's simulation and optimization tools are critical for modeling new process configurations
Emerson control provides financial stability and cross-selling to Emerson's industrial automation customer base — Emerson's ownership provides AspenTech access to Emerson's massive industrial customer base and financial resources while Emerson leverages AspenTech's software for complete industrial automation solutions

Risks to watch — MANH

Enterprise software valuation premium requires sustained high growth — Manhattan trades at a premium P/E and EV/Sales multiple relative to traditional software companies; sustaining this valuation requires consistent 15%+ revenue growth that could be threatened by macroeconomic slowdown or competitive disruption
Implementation capacity is gated by system integrator availability — Manhattan WMS implementations require specialized implementation partners (consultants trained on Manhattan's platform); a shortage of trained implementers can limit how quickly Manhattan can onboard new customers
Competition from SAP EWM (SAP's warehouse module), Oracle WMS, and Blue Yonder — while Manhattan leads the independent WMS market, SAP and Oracle can offer WMS as part of broader ERP implementations; large companies already on SAP may prefer SAP EWM despite capability gaps

Risks to watch — AZPN

Emerson's majority control limits independent strategic flexibility — AspenTech's majority owner is Emerson Electric; strategic decisions must align with Emerson's interests; the relationship creates complexity for minority public shareholders
Energy industry capital spending cycles affect AspenTech's new customer acquisition — while renewals are stable, new customer acquisition depends on refinery and chemical plant capital spending; energy sector downturns reduce new AspenTech investment
Integration complexity from Emerson asset combination — combining Emerson's industrial software assets with AspenTech's platform creates integration challenges; new product combinations take time to reach market

Frequently asked questions

WMS definition: a warehouse management system is software that orchestrates all activities within a distribution center or warehouse — receiving inbound shipments, storing inventory in optimal locations, directing workers to pick customer orders, packing, labeling, and releasing shipments for delivery; a WMS tracks every item in the warehouse in real time (via barcode scanning, RFID, or vision technology), optimizes worker and equipment movement (minimizing travel distance, maximizing throughput), and interfaces with carrier systems, enterprise resource planning (ERP), and order management systems. Why implementations are expensive: WMS must be deeply integrated with the physical warehouse design — the number of aisles, rack configurations, conveyor systems, and robotic equipment all affect how the WMS directs work; the WMS must also integrate with the company's ERP (SAP, Oracle), e-commerce platform, carrier systems (FedEx, UPS), and labor management; these integrations require custom configuration and extensive testing; implementation requires configuring thousands of process parameters, training hundreds to thousands of workers, and running parallel systems during cutover; for a large distribution center, 18-36 months and $10-50M+ in implementation costs is common. Switching costs: once implemented, the WMS is embedded in every aspect of warehouse operations — standard operating procedures are built around WMS workflows, workers are trained on WMS screens, conveyor and automation systems integrate with WMS APIs, management reporting uses WMS data; replacing the WMS requires rebuilding all of this from scratch; the switching cost is so high that once a customer is on Manhattan WMS, it essentially never leaves; renewal rates in WMS are typically 95%+.

Interactive comparison engine

Compare more than two at a time

This page is a fixed writeup on MANH and AZPN. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.

Up to 5 tickers at once

Add three more names beside MANH and AZPN, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.

Scoreboard verdict

AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.

Full risk suite

Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.

Correlation heatmap

Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.

Valuation vs profitability

A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.

Holdings overlap and CSV export

For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.

Open MANH vs AZPN in the engine See what's included

Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.

Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Start Free Trial Read Investing Guides

Related comparisons