brimindinvest.com / compare / xlf-vs-vfhLIVE
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund · ETF / Financials
$53.57
+4.83% this month
VERSUS
COMPARE
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF · ETF / Financials
$131.44
+4.90% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
XLF
3
VFH
1
XLF LEADS 3/5
Comparison scoreboard
XLF LEADS 3/5
Exp. Ratio
XLF 0.08%
VFH 0.09%
1Y Return
XLF +8.32%
VFH +9.60%
Div. Yield
XLF 1.54%
VFH 1.54%
AUM
XLF $49.42B
VFH $13.46B
Beta
XLF 0.88
VFH 0.93
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take

XLF vs VFH Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

XLF and VFH both provide financial sector exposure but at different scales. XLF holds S&P 500 mega-cap financials (Berkshire, JPMorgan, Visa) in a highly liquid, low-cost ETF. VFH holds 400+ financial companies including regional banks that provide different interest rate and credit risk characteristics. The 2023 regional bank failures demonstrated VFH's incremental risk vs XLF. For diversified financial exposure, XLF; for total financial market coverage including regional banks, VFH.

XLF vs VFH — Financial Select Sector SPDR (S&P 500 large-cap financials with Berkshire, JPMorgan, Visa, and Mastercard as top holdings at 0.09%) versus Vanguard Financials ETF (total market financials with 400+ holdings including regional banks and smaller financial companies at 0.10%).

Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026

XLF holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. VFH has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+9.60% vs +8.32% for XLF).

Normalized 1Y performance
XLF
VFH
Recent returns
XLF
VFH
Who should consider this stock?
XLF may suit investors who:
  • want large-cap financial exposure with maximum liquidity including Berkshire, JPMorgan, Visa, and Mastercard as core holdings
  • prefer the S&P 500 quality filter excluding smaller regional banks that face higher concentration and commercial real estate risk
  • use financial sector ETFs for interest rate cycle positioning — mega-banks' interest income benefit from rising rates is clear in XLF's top holdings
  • are comfortable with Berkshire's 12% concentration creating insurance/conglomerate exposure within a financial ETF
VFH may suit investors who:
  • want complete US financial market coverage including regional banks, smaller insurers, and specialty finance companies beyond XLF's S&P 500 large-cap scope
  • believe regional banks' interest rate sensitivity provides incremental return potential when rate environment is favorable for community bank lending margins
  • prefer Vanguard's total market methodology for long-term buy-and-hold financial sector positioning
  • are comfortable with 2023-style regional bank stress risk, lower liquidity than XLF, and broader exposure to commercial real estate loan book risk in smaller banks
Performance & AI score
MetricXLFVFH
ETF score61.054.0
Latest close$53.57$131.44
1M return+4.83%+4.90%
6M return-1.09%-0.77%
1Y return+8.32%+9.60%
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)

How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?

PeriodXLFVFH
1Y ago$11K (+10.0%)
started 2025-06-18
$11.13K (+11.3%)
started 2025-06-18
5Y ago$18.16K (+81.6%)
started 2021-06-18
$18.54K (+85.4%)
started 2021-06-18
10Y ago$42.44K (+324.4%)
started 2016-06-20
$43.04K (+330.4%)
started 2016-06-20

Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fund characteristics
MetricXLFVFH
Expense ratio0.08%0.09%
Total assets (AUM)$49.42B$13.46B
Dividend yield1.54%1.54%
Trailing P/E16.9016.20
Beta0.880.93
52-week change8.32%9.60%
Risk & fund metrics
MetricXLFVFH
1Y return+8.32%+9.60%
6M return-1.09%-0.77%
1M return+4.83%+4.90%
1Y Sharpe ratio0.310.39
Beta0.880.93
Dividend yield1.54%1.54%
5Y CAGR+10.66%+10.78%
Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot
XLF max drawdown14.79%
VFH max drawdown14.75%
XLF max wkly drop4.81%
VFH max wkly drop4.85%
5Y risk snapshot
XLF max drawdown25.81%
VFH max drawdown25.66%
XLF max wkly drop12.19%
VFH max wkly drop12.99%
10Y risk snapshot
XLF max drawdown42.86%
VFH max drawdown44.42%
XLF max wkly drop22.99%
VFH max wkly drop23.46%
Performance metrics by period
PeriodMetricXLFVFH
1YGrowth+8.32%+9.60%
CAGR+8.32%+9.61%
Sharpe ratio0.310.39
Max drawdown14.79%14.75%
Max daily drop3.35%3.43%
Max wkly drop4.81%4.85%
5YGrowth+65.90%+66.82%
CAGR+10.66%+10.78%
Sharpe ratio0.400.40
Max drawdown25.81%25.66%
Max daily drop7.32%7.15%
Max wkly drop12.19%12.99%
10YGrowth+247.74%+242.02%
CAGR+13.28%+13.09%
Sharpe ratio0.470.46
Max drawdown42.86%44.42%
Max daily drop13.71%13.69%
Max wkly drop22.99%23.46%
Fund overview
CategoryXLFVFH
Fund nameState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETFVanguard Financials Index Fund ETF Shares
TypeETFETF
Expense ratio0.08%0.09%
Total assets (AUM)$49.42B$13.46B
Dividend yield1.54%1.54%
XLF strengths
  • Large-cap financial quality filter: XLF's S&P 500 universe ensures only the largest, most systemically important financial institutions and proven financial businesses
  • Berkshire Hathaway as diversified financial anchor: BRK.B's ~12% weight provides insurance + operating business + equity portfolio diversification within XLF's financial sector allocation
  • Visa and Mastercard payment network premium: XLF includes Visa and Mastercard — high-margin, asset-light payment networks that provide growth without traditional bank credit risk
VFH strengths
  • 400+ holdings vs XLF's 70: VFH's breadth includes regional banks, smaller insurers, and specialty finance companies not in XLF's S&P 500 scope
  • Regional bank rate sensitivity: smaller regional banks in VFH may benefit more directly from interest rate improvements in lending spreads than large universal banks
  • Complete financial sector representation: VFH aims to capture the full investable US financial market vs XLF's large-cap selection
Risks to watch — XLF
  • Bank earnings interest rate sensitivity: XLF's large bank holdings (JPMorgan, BofA, Wells Fargo) earn more when rates are high (net interest margin) but face loan demand reduction in rate cycles
  • Berkshire concentration creates non-bank characteristics: 12% Berkshire means XLF isn't a pure bank/financial ETF — investors wanting pure bank exposure may prefer KBE or KBWB
  • Credit risk in economic downturns: bank loan portfolios face elevated charge-offs in recessions — financial sector ETFs underperform significantly in credit cycles (2008-2009, 2020)
Risks to watch — VFH
  • Regional bank concentration risk: smaller regional banks in VFH are more exposed to commercial real estate (CRE) loan stress and deposit instability than the mega-banks in XLF
  • 2023 regional bank crisis impact: the SVB/Signature Bank/First Republic failures in March 2023 impacted regional banks disproportionately — VFH's regional bank exposure created more volatility than XLF during this period
  • Lower liquidity than XLF: VFH's lower trading volume creates wider bid-ask spreads for tactical positions
Frequently asked questions
Berkshire Hathaway is classified in the Financials sector by GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) because its primary revenue driver is insurance operations (GEICO, BH Reinsurance, General Re). Despite also owning operating businesses (BNSF railroad, BH Energy) and a vast equity portfolio, the insurance classification dominates Berkshire's sector assignment. This means XLF has ~12% weighting in Berkshire — providing diversified financial holding company exposure alongside traditional bank and payment network holdings.
AI Prediction SignalNext 5 trading days
Members only
XLF
+2.8%BUY
VFH
+1.1%HOLD

Sign up to unlock AI price predictions

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required
Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →