C vs WFC Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Citigroup and Wells Fargo are both major US banks in the midst of multi-year regulatory and strategic turnarounds, and both trade at discounts to peers. Citi's transformation is global and complex, focused on simplifying its international footprint and improving its profitability profile. Wells Fargo's single largest catalyst — the removal of the Federal Reserve asset cap — is more clearly defined and potentially closer in timing.
The choice between C and WFC is between two turnaround bank stories: Wells Fargo's simpler domestic asset cap removal thesis versus Citigroup's more complex global simplification — both offer multiple expansion potential if their respective catalysts materialize.
C holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. C has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+21.60% vs -1.24%), though WFC has the better forward P/E setup (10.28x vs 10.32x for C). C leads on both revenue growth (15.50%) and operating margin (36.23%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +16.25% for C and +17.76% for WFC.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- want exposure to global corporate banking and treasury services at a discount to tangible book value
- believe Jane Fraser's simplification strategy will unlock a sustained ROE improvement
- are comfortable with a multi-year transformation timeline and regulatory complexity
- prefer international banking diversification versus a purely domestic franchise
- see the Federal Reserve asset cap removal as a near-term, high-confidence catalyst
- value a dominant US retail deposit franchise with unparalleled branch density
- prefer a simpler bank turnaround story with a more domestic focus
- want dividend income while the recovery thesis plays out
| Metric | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 54.8 | 42.4 |
| AI ranki | #264 | #961 |
| Latest closei | $123.10 | $85.89 |
| 1M returni | -4.20% | +6.76% |
| 3M returni | -7.84% | -2.28% |
| 6M returni | -2.01% | +8.47% |
| 1Y returni | +21.60% | -1.24% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.11K (+21.1%) started 2025-11-03 | $9.84K (-1.6%) started 2025-11-03 |
| 5Y ago | $23.62K (+136.2%) started 2021-11-03 | $20.05K (+100.5%) started 2021-11-03 |
| 10Y ago | $45.81K (+358.1%) started 2016-11-03 | $31.5K (+215.0%) started 2016-11-03 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $222.93B | $247.31B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 14.32 | 11.62 |
| Forward P/Ei | 10.32 | 10.28 |
| Price/Salesi | 2.04 | 3.22 |
| EV/Revenuei | 0.38 | 1.29 |
| Analyst targeti | $154.50 | $97.02 |
| Target upsidei | +16.25% | +17.76% |
| Metric | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 15.50% | 0.40% |
| Earnings growthi | 61.00% | 12.70% |
| EPS growthi | +61.00% | +12.70% |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | 36.23% | 34.06% |
| Profit margini | 21.83% | 27.64% |
| ROIC proxyi | 8.53% | 12.91% |
| Return on equityi | 8.53% | 12.91% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.02% | 2.43% |
| Payout ratioi | 25.92% | 26.09% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 1.10 | 0.95 |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Over the past year, C and WFC have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.67), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +21.15% | -1.62% |
| CAGRi | +21.22% | -1.62% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.36% | 25.56% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.66 | -0.11 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.93 | -0.15 | |
| Max drawdowni | 17.20% | 23.83% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.49% | 10.89% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.04% | 10.91% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 7.57% | 12.62% | |
| Max daily dropi | 5.60% | 5.70% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.64% | 8.74% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +104.39% | +81.52% |
| CAGRi | +15.37% | +12.67% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.38% | 29.52% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.48 | 0.40 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.71 | 0.58 | |
| Max drawdowni | 40.60% | 37.10% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.49% | 10.89% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 14.59% | 13.84% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 18.84% | 17.22% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.14% | 9.12% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 17.35% | 17.68% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +234.63% | +140.72% |
| CAGRi | +12.84% | +9.18% | |
| Volatilityi | 33.22% | 32.42% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.40 | 0.30 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.57 | 0.42 | |
| Max drawdowni | 56.51% | 64.46% | |
| Current drawdowni | 15.49% | 10.89% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 16.87% | 18.84% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.13% | 24.02% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.30% | 15.87% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 31.86% | 30.08% |
| Category | C | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Citigroup Inc. | Wells Fargo & Company |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Core business | Citigroup is a global bank with significant international operations across Services (treasury and trade solutions), Markets (fixed income and equities trading), Banking (investment banking and commercial lending), and US Personal Banking (cards and retail). Under CEO Jane Fraser, Citi is executing a multi-year simplification — divesting international retail banking businesses and refocusing on Services, Markets, and US consumer banking. The transformation is the central investment thesis. | Wells Fargo is one of the four largest US banks with a dominant retail banking franchise across deposits, mortgages, and consumer lending. Its investment in a non-operating holding company structure allows it to compete across wealth management, commercial banking, and consumer financial services. The company has been operating under a Federal Reserve asset cap since 2018 — limiting total asset growth — as a result of its consumer fraud scandals, and its removal is the single largest near-term catalyst for the stock. |
| Investor focus | Investors track the pace of Citi's transformation — revenue mix shift toward higher-returning Services and Markets segments, regulatory resolution of its outstanding consent orders, tangible book value growth, and capital return capacity. | Investors focus primarily on the Federal Reserve asset cap removal timeline and its impact on NII and loan growth capacity, fee revenue recovery in investment banking and wealth management, and management's execution on cost efficiency targets. |
- Services segment (treasury and trade solutions) provides high-quality, recurring corporate client revenue
- Transformation plan is simplifying the business mix toward higher-return segments
- Significant discount to tangible book value provides a margin of safety on valuation
- Asset cap removal catalyst provides a clear, quantifiable upside scenario for NII expansion
- Dominant retail deposit franchise with over 4,500 branches and 70M+ customers
- Fee revenue recovery in investment banking and markets is adding a new income dimension
- Multiple outstanding regulatory consent orders creating uncertainty and restricting capital returns
- US Personal Banking credit card losses in a higher-for-longer rate environment
- Transformation timeline and cost savings are multi-year with execution risk
- Asset cap removal timing remains uncertain and is subject to ongoing regulatory review
- NII sensitivity to interest rate cuts reducing net interest margin
- Reputational overhang from years of compliance issues
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on C and WFC. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside C and WFC, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.