JPM vs GS: JPMorgan vs Goldman Sachs — Which Bank Stock Is Better?: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
JPMorgan is the best-in-class diversified US megabank with consistent through-cycle returns, while Goldman Sachs is the elite investment banking and trading franchise that has refocused on institutional strengths after retreating from consumer banking. JPM typically trades at a higher multiple for its consistency; GS offers more earnings leverage to investment banking and markets cycles.
Use this JPM vs GS comparison to choose between diversified megabank stability and focused investment banking cyclicality. JPM is the higher-quality, lower-volatility option; GS offers more earnings leverage when capital markets are active and may offer more upside in bull cycles.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want the highest-quality, most diversified US megabank with consistent earnings
- Value a growing dividend and a strong capital return program
- Prefer lower earnings volatility with exposure across consumer, commercial, and investment banking
- Believe Jamie Dimon's conservative capital allocation creates long-term compounding value
- Want concentrated exposure to elite investment banking and trading when markets are active
- Believe the refocused strategy post-Marcus exit will improve returns on equity
- See a valuation opportunity if capital markets activity accelerates (M&A, IPOs)
- Are comfortable with higher earnings volatility in exchange for potential upside in active market cycles
| Metric | JPM | GS |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | N/A | N/A |
| AI ranki | N/A | N/A |
| Latest closei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | JPM | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | N/A |
| Target upsidei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | JPM | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margini | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | JPM | GS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A |
| Category | JPM | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Company | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Sector | Financials | Financials |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | The largest US bank by assets, with diversified businesses spanning consumer banking, commercial banking, investment banking, asset management, and markets. Consistent earnings through cycles with strong capital generation. | Global investment bank with leading advisory, underwriting, and trading businesses, plus asset and wealth management. Exited consumer banking (Marcus) to refocus on core institutional and high-net-worth strengths. |
| Investor focus | Net interest income trajectory, investment banking and markets revenue cycles, expense discipline, capital return via dividends and buybacks, and credit quality. | Investment banking deal flow recovery, trading revenue consistency, asset and wealth management fee growth, and expense efficiency after the Marcus retreat. |
- Largest and most diversified US bank with scale advantages across every business line
- Consistently strong return on equity relative to peers through multiple economic cycles
- Fortress balance sheet and conservative risk management culture under Jamie Dimon
- Best-in-class investment banking and advisory franchise with top-tier M&A market share
- Strong fixed income and equities trading operations generating consistent revenue
- Refocused strategy after Marcus exit improves returns and reduces consumer credit risk
- Net interest margin compression if interest rates decline
- Credit quality deterioration in consumer and commercial loan books in a recession
- Investment banking revenue cyclicality tied to M&A and capital markets activity
- Investment banking revenue is highly cyclical and tied to deal and IPO market conditions
- Trading revenue volatility adds earnings unpredictability
- Higher concentration in institutional and capital markets vs JPM's more diversified model
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on JPM and GS. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside JPM and GS, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.