KKR vs ARES Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
KKR and ARES are both leading alternative asset managers with different strategic emphasis. KKR was founded on PE and has built a multi-strategy platform (PE, credit, real assets, insurance) with Global Atlantic providing transformative permanent capital. Ares is primarily a credit specialist with the most predictable FRE from direct lending and structured credit management. In strong PE deal environments, KKR's more PE-heavy carried interest exposure provides upside. In credit market growth scenarios, Ares's direct lending dominance captures the structural bank lending retreat.
KKR vs ARES — KKR & Co (multi-strategy alternative manager with PE heritage, Global Atlantic insurance capital as a $100B+ permanent capital advantage, and $550B+ AUM across PE, credit, and real assets) versus Ares Management (world's largest credit alternative manager with $450B+ AUM dominated by direct lending and structured credit providing predictable FRE from stable management fee income).
KKR and ARES are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. ARES has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-19.85% vs -20.23%), though KKR trades at the lower forward P/E (13.12x vs 17.67x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for KKR (+29.40%) than for ARES (+12.29%).
- →want exposure to KKR's multi-strategy alternative platform with PE carried interest upside when deal environments improve alongside credit and real assets management fees
- →value the Global Atlantic insurance capital as a transformative structural advantage — $100B+ permanent capital not subject to fundraising or LP redemptions at insurance return hurdles
- →are positive on KKR's PE brand driving premium deal flow and LP relationships built over 50 years in leveraged buyouts — brand matters in alternative asset management
- →prefer multi-strategy alternative exposure rather than credit specialization — KKR's diversified strategy mix provides different drivers than Ares's credit concentration
- →prefer more stable and predictable FRE from credit AUM management fees vs KKR's PE-influenced carried interest cycle dependency
- →are positive on structural direct lending market growth as bank regulatory constraints create ongoing opportunity for non-bank middle market lenders
- →want credit-specialist alternative management expertise rather than KKR's generalist multi-strategy approach — depth of credit knowledge creates genuine competitive differentiation
- →value Ares's insurance capital partnerships as a strategic capital advantage building toward KKR/Apollo-scale permanent capital at lower execution risk than KKR's full insurance acquisition
| Metric | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 56.7 | 59.5 |
| AI rank | #231 | #175 |
| Latest close | $97.01 | $129.34 |
| 1M return | +4.40% | +7.87% |
| 6M return | -26.31% | -21.42% |
| 1Y return | -20.23% | -19.85% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.03K (-19.7%) started 2025-06-18 | $8.31K (-16.9%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $18.73K (+87.3%) started 2021-06-18 | $31.23K (+212.3%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $107.88K (+978.8%) started 2016-06-20 | $246.16K (+2361.6%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $90.46B | $42.66B |
| Trailing P/E | 33.00 | 59.60 |
| Forward P/E | 13.12 | 17.67 |
| Price/Sales | 3.57 | 7.22 |
| EV/Revenue | 6.00 | 8.29 |
| Analyst target | $125.53 | $145.24 |
| Target upside | +29.40% | +12.29% |
| Metric | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -6.60% | 28.30% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | 770.50% |
| EPS growth | N/A | +770.50% |
| FCF margin | N/A | +29.74% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 11.68% | 10.54% |
| ROIC proxy | 7.66% | 14.18% |
| Return on equity | 7.66% | 14.18% |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 4.00% |
| Beta | 1.79 | 1.52 |
| Debt/equity | 69.03 | 168.76 |
| Current ratio | 0.86 | 0.49 |
| Quick ratio | 0.81 | 0.41 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -20.23% | -19.85% |
| CAGR | -20.24% | -19.87% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.54 | -0.43 | |
| Max drawdown | 44.62% | 49.30% | |
| Max daily drop | 9.69% | 11.19% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.75% | 19.66% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +79.46% | +164.39% |
| CAGR | +12.41% | +21.47% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.38 | 0.59 | |
| Max drawdown | 49.42% | 49.97% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.18% | 15.48% | |
| Max wkly drop | 19.80% | 22.99% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +798.77% | +1376.07% |
| CAGR | +24.57% | +30.92% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | 0.80 | |
| Max drawdown | 49.42% | 49.97% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.18% | 15.48% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.77% | 27.59% |
| Category | KKR | ARES |
|---|---|---|
| Company | KKR & Co Inc. | Ares Management Corporation |
| Sector | Financial Services / Alternative Asset Management | Financial Services / Alternative Asset Management |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) pioneered the leveraged buyout industry in the 1970s and has evolved into a $550B+ multi-strategy alternative asset manager. KKR's core businesses: Private Equity (flagship buyout funds — historically the largest business), Credit (direct lending, leveraged finance, CLOs, real estate credit), Real Assets (infrastructure, real estate equity), and Insurance (Global Atlantic — KKR-owned insurance company providing captive capital). KKR's acquisition of Global Atlantic in 2021 is strategically transformative — insurance float provides $100B+ in permanent capital with matching returns from KKR's credit products. | Ares Management is the world's largest credit-focused alternative asset manager with $450B+ in AUM — primarily direct lending and credit strategies with complementary private equity and real estate businesses. Ares's credit dominance provides highly predictable FRE from management fees on deployed loan portfolios — a more stable earnings stream than PE-heavy managers that depend on deal exit timing for carried interest realization. |
| Investor focus | Investors focus on KKR's Global Atlantic insurance capital strategic advantage, fee-related earnings growth from multi-strategy AUM, PE deal activity and carried interest realization pace, and competition across all three major alternative strategies vs focused specialists. | Investors focus on Ares's credit AUM growth (direct lending market expansion as banks retreat), FRE growth from management fees on deployed credit capital, credit quality of underlying borrowers in high-rate environment, and Ares's expansion into insurance capital partnerships (Aspida). |
- →Global Atlantic insurance capital: owning a large insurance company provides KKR with $100B+ of permanent, non-redeemable capital at insurance industry return requirements — a structural advantage generating management fee income without fundraising
- →Leveraged buyout brand heritage: KKR's PE brand is among the most recognized globally — premium deal flow access and LP relationships built over 50 years provide competitive advantages in deal sourcing
- →Multi-strategy platform for LP capital concentration: large institutional LPs prefer concentrating capital with fewer relationships — KKR's multi-strategy platform (PE, credit, real assets) captures more wallet share per LP
- →Credit-dominant AUM provides predictable FRE: management fees on $300B+ credit AUM generate more consistent earnings than PE transaction cycle-dependent managers
- →Direct lending market structural growth: bank regulatory retreat from middle market corporate lending creates a large, growing, structurally growing market for Ares's core business
- →Insurance capital partnerships at scale: Ares manages insurance company AUM through Aspida and other partnerships — long-duration capital with stable FRE generation
- →PE performance cycle dependency: KKR's origins and reputation are PE-centric — PE deal environment impacts KKR's carried interest significantly more than credit-specialist Ares
- →Scale vs specialization competitive tension: KKR competes with Ares in credit, Blackstone in PE and real assets, and Brookfield in infrastructure — fewer specialists at each strategy vs KKR's multi-strategy presence
- →Global Atlantic integration complexity: managing a $100B+ insurance company alongside asset management requires insurance expertise, regulatory compliance, and balance sheet management different from pure asset management
- →Credit quality monitoring required: Ares's direct lending portfolios concentrated in middle market corporate borrowers face default risk in economic stress — portfolio quality is critical to management fee sustainability
- →PE upside limited vs KKR: Ares's PE business is smaller relative to credit vs KKR's more balanced strategy allocation — less PE upside in strong deal environments
- →Competition intensifying in direct lending: Blackstone, Apollo, Carlyle, and KKR are all building large credit franchises competing directly with Ares's core business — competitive moat in credit is harder to maintain as all managers expand credit
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.