IVZ vs BEN Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
IVZ and BEN are both large traditional active asset managers facing the structural secular headwind of AUM shifting from active to passive. Invesco's QQQ provides a meaningful passive ETF revenue counter-current. Franklin's aggressive buybacks and Western Asset management are key strategic elements. Both trade at deep discount valuations vs passive managers like BlackRock — the discount reflects the structural revenue headwind that may not fully abate. Income investors collect above-average dividend yields while waiting for catalysts.
IVZ vs BEN — Invesco ($1.6T+ AUM with QQQ Nasdaq-100 ETF franchise generating above-average ETF revenue, alternatives expansion, and global distribution) versus Franklin Resources/Templeton ($1.6T+ AUM with Legg Mason integration adding Western Asset fixed income and ClearBridge equity, aggressive buybacks from Johnson family-controlled balance sheet).
IVZ holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BEN has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+36.91% vs +22.81%), though IVZ has the better forward P/E setup (10.08x vs 10.95x for BEN). IVZ leads on both revenue growth (20.50%) and operating margin (19.95%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +1.57% for IVZ and +1.53% for BEN.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- value QQQ's enormous ETF franchise as a structural revenue source counter-balancing active mutual fund outflows — Invesco earns meaningful fees from the Nasdaq-100 ETF even as active products decline
- see Invesco's high dividend yield as compelling value if active outflow headwinds stabilize rather than accelerate
- believe Invesco's alternatives and real estate exposure diversifies earnings beyond traditional active equity and fixed income facing most passive competition
- are comfortable with QQQ's licensing fee economics and Oppenheimer acquisition leverage as known risks priced into the discount valuation
- value Franklin's Johnson family-driven buyback discipline — controlling shareholders with long-term orientation consistently return capital through buybacks compounding per-share earnings despite AUM headwinds
- believe Western Asset Management's fixed income reputation will recover from recent personnel disruption — a turnaround in Western Asset performance restores institutional AUM credibility
- prefer Franklin's global distribution across 35+ countries vs more US-centric asset managers — international diversification provides some resilience to US active investment trends
- see deep discount valuation as a yield and value opportunity if net outflows stabilize at current levels and buybacks sustain per-share earnings growth
| Metric | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 37.3 | 37.6 |
| AI ranki | #1156 | #1135 |
| Latest closei | $28.80 | $31.38 |
| 1M returni | -6.43% | -5.74% |
| 3M returni | -4.95% | -5.85% |
| 6M returni | +19.95% | +18.19% |
| 1Y returni | +22.81% | +36.91% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.2K (+22.0%) started 2025-10-15 | $13.77K (+37.7%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $16.6K (+66.0%) started 2021-10-18 | $15.12K (+51.2%) started 2021-10-18 |
| 10Y ago | $24.14K (+141.4%) started 2016-10-17 | $23.9K (+139.0%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $14.51B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 19.44 | 23.57 |
| Forward P/Ei | 10.08 | 10.95 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 2.71 | 2.27 |
| Analyst targeti | $33.38 | $35.18 |
| Target upsidei | +1.57% | +1.53% |
| Metric | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 20.50% | 14.30% |
| Earnings growthi | 35.00% | 106.70% |
| EPS growthi | +35.00% | +106.70% |
| FCF margini | +16.53% | -32.08% |
| Operating margini | 19.95% | 12.98% |
| Profit margini | -0.93% | 8.72% |
| ROIC proxyi | -0.57% | 7.89% |
| Return on equityi | -0.57% | 7.89% |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.62% | 3.81% |
| Payout ratioi | 56.46% | 89.12% |
| Dividend growth streaki | No increase yet | No increase yet |
| Betai | 1.60 | 1.57 |
| Debt/equityi | 12.06 | 24.80 |
| Current ratioi | 0.71 | 5.49 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Over the past year, IVZ and BEN have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.67), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +22.03% | +37.69% |
| CAGRi | +22.07% | +37.75% | |
| Volatilityi | 33.86% | 27.53% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.63 | 1.14 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.90 | 1.67 | |
| Max drawdowni | 22.66% | 19.21% | |
| Current drawdowni | 13.54% | 12.27% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.87% | 4.44% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 9.20% | 6.27% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.12% | 4.81% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.06% | 11.70% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +38.06% | +25.32% |
| CAGRi | +6.67% | +4.62% | |
| Volatilityi | 36.41% | 31.65% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.24 | 0.16 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.34 | 0.23 | |
| Max drawdowni | 48.87% | 47.43% | |
| Current drawdowni | 13.54% | 12.27% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 23.62% | 24.21% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 27.12% | 26.40% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.85% | 12.56% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.08% | 14.33% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +46.47% | +42.03% |
| CAGRi | +3.89% | +3.57% | |
| Volatilityi | 39.29% | 32.78% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.18 | 0.13 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.26 | 0.19 | |
| Max drawdowni | 79.72% | 62.10% | |
| Current drawdowni | 13.54% | 12.27% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 32.65% | 23.62% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 37.98% | 26.98% | |
| Max daily dropi | 21.13% | 13.62% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 29.58% | 24.27% |
| Category | IVZ | BEN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Invesco Ltd. | Franklin Resources Inc. |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Core business | Invesco is a global asset manager with $1.6T+ in AUM across active equity, fixed income, multi-asset, alternatives, and passive/ETF products. Invesco's notable franchise includes QQQ (the second most-traded ETF globally tracking the Nasdaq-100), PowerShares/Invesco ETF lineup, and active equity funds including Invesco OPCIT (contrarian value fund). Invesco has made acquisitions to add capabilities (Oppenheimer Funds in 2019, WisdomTree stake). Invesco is managing the challenge all active managers face — net outflows from active to passive — while leveraging QQQ's massive success as a counter-current. | Franklin Resources (operating as Franklin Templeton) is a global active asset manager with $1.6T+ in AUM across equity, fixed income, multi-asset, and alternatives. Franklin Templeton has a storied history — Sir John Templeton's global equity investing pioneered international diversification for US investors. Franklin's fixed income capability includes Western Asset Management (a leading bond manager) and ClearBridge Investments (equity). Franklin made major acquisitions: Legg Mason (2020, $4.5B) adding ClearBridge, Western Asset, and other investment brands. Franklin generates significant free cash flow from recurring management fees and has been aggressively buying back stock — the Johnson family (founders) controls 36% of shares. |
| Investor focus | Investors focus on Invesco's AUM flow trajectory (net outflows from active vs ETF inflows from QQQ), expense ratio compression on active products, acquisition integration costs, and high dividend yield as a value signal or yield trap warning. | Investors focus on Franklin's active AUM flow trajectory (net outflows from active fixed income and equity), Western Asset Management performance recovery (had controversial departures and performance challenges), Legg Mason integration, and significant capital return through buybacks. |
- QQQ franchise generates enormous fee revenue: QQQ's $250B+ in AUM at 0.20% expense ratio generates $500M+ annually — a passive ETF franchise that provides above-average revenue per AUM vs Vanguard's 0.03% ETFs
- Alternatives and real estate diversification: Invesco's $100B+ in alternatives AUM (real estate, private credit) provides higher-margin, less passive-threatened revenue streams
- Global distribution network: Invesco's presence in 26 countries provides diversified distribution vs US-only asset managers
- Global active management history and diversification: Franklin Templeton manages assets across 35+ countries with genuinely international investment teams and distribution
- Western Asset Management fixed income expertise: Western Asset is one of the most respected bond managers globally — large institutional AUM from pension funds and sovereign wealth funds
- Aggressive share buybacks reduce share count: Franklin's controlling Johnson family supports consistent buyback programs — per-share earnings grow even as total AUM faces headwinds
- Active equity net outflows are structural: Invesco's active mutual funds face ongoing redemptions as investors shift to passive — this structural headwind is not a temporary cyclical issue
- QQQ economics disadvantage vs owner: Invesco licenses the Nasdaq-100 from Nasdaq (paying ongoing licensing fees) rather than owning the index — not the ideal economic arrangement for the issuer of the most popular Nasdaq ETF
- High leverage from Oppenheimer Funds acquisition: the 2019 Oppenheimer acquisition added significant debt and integration costs — balance sheet leverage constrains capital flexibility
- Net AUM outflows from active strategies: Franklin faces the same structural active-to-passive headwind as all traditional active managers — net flows have been negative for years
- Western Asset management controversy: high-profile personnel changes and performance challenges at Western Asset in 2023-2024 affected institutional trust in the flagship bond management brand
- Legg Mason integration ongoing complexity: integrating multiple investment brands (ClearBridge, Western Asset, Martin Currie, etc.) while maintaining each brand's investment culture requires delicate management
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on IVZ and BEN. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside IVZ and BEN, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.