COPX vs XME ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
COPX and XME both provide metals and mining ETF exposure but with different scope — COPX is a pure-play global copper mining ETF concentrated on the world's leading copper miners (Freeport-McMoRan, Southern Copper, Antofagasta), while XME is a diversified U.S.-focused metals and mining ETF spanning steel, aluminum, copper, gold, and coal with equal weighting. COPX is for investors with a specific copper thesis; XME is for broad metals sector exposure.
COPX vs XME is pure-play global copper mining exposure with direct leverage to energy transition copper demand (Global X's COPX tracking world's leading copper miners including Freeport-McMoRan and Southern Copper, driven by EVs, grid upgrades, and renewable energy copper intensity) versus diversified U.S. metals and mining equal-weighted exposure across steel, copper, aluminum, gold, and coal (SPDR's XME providing broad commodity sector coverage with steel and diversified mining company exposure alongside copper) — concentrated copper thesis versus broad metals diversification.
COPX holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. COPX has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+21.87% vs +2.91% for XME).
- Have a specific thesis on copper demand from EV adoption, grid electrification, and renewable energy infrastructure buildout driving copper prices and copper miner earnings higher
- Want global copper mining exposure including the world's best copper deposits regardless of listing country (Chile's SCCO, Canada's First Quantum, UK's Antofagasta alongside U.S.-listed FCX)
- Prefer concentrated single-commodity mining ETF for clear, direct expression of their copper market view without dilution from steel, gold, or coal exposures
- Want broad U.S. metals sector exposure across multiple commodity types including steel (Nucor, Steel Dynamics), copper (Freeport-McMoRan), and specialty metals without concentrating in a single metal
- Value XME's equal weighting for providing meaningful exposure to smaller, higher-beta mining companies that would be negligible in a market-cap weighted metals ETF
- Seek a single metals and mining ETF that captures both commodity price cycles and domestic U.S. manufacturing/construction cycles through steel company exposure
| Metric | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 27.6 | 27.0 |
| Latest closei | $71.25 | $93.45 |
| 1M returni | -14.75% | -10.86% |
| 3M returni | -19.06% | -19.20% |
| 6M returni | -16.84% | -22.63% |
| 1Y returni | +21.87% | +2.91% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.51K (+25.1%) started 2025-11-06 | $10.32K (+3.2%) started 2025-11-06 |
| 5Y ago | $24.4K (+144.0%) started 2021-11-08 | $21.88K (+118.8%) started 2021-11-08 |
| 10Y ago | $58.86K (+488.6%) started 2016-11-07 | $45.37K (+353.7%) started 2016-11-07 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $6.33B | $3.69B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.66% | 0.35% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 15.64 | 17.13 |
| Betai | 1.14 | 1.37 |
| 52-week change | 21.87% | 2.91% |
| Metric | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +21.87% | +2.91% |
| 6M returni | -16.84% | -22.63% |
| 3M returni | -19.06% | -19.20% |
| 1M returni | -14.75% | -10.86% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 |
| Betai | 1.14 | 1.37 |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.66% | 0.35% |
| 5Y CAGR | +16.64% | +15.94% |
Over the past year, COPX and XME have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.81), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +21.87% | +2.91% |
| CAGRi | +21.88% | +2.91% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.85% | 37.64% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.56 | 0.15 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.79 | 0.20 | |
| Max drawdowni | 27.82% | 31.84% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.13% | 29.55% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 10.58% | 12.20% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 13.12% | 14.61% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.62% | 7.81% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 16.46% | 12.60% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +115.73% | +109.27% |
| CAGRi | +16.64% | +15.94% | |
| Volatilityi | 37.70% | 32.98% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.48 | 0.48 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.69 | 0.68 | |
| Max drawdowni | 42.12% | 37.27% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.13% | 29.55% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 15.33% | 13.55% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 18.21% | 16.18% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.62% | 7.81% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.59% | 16.54% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +374.46% | +298.53% |
| CAGRi | +16.86% | +14.83% | |
| Volatilityi | 36.27% | 33.00% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.49 | 0.45 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.70 | 0.64 | |
| Max drawdowni | 65.41% | 61.69% | |
| Current drawdowni | 26.13% | 29.55% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 18.18% | 15.73% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 21.83% | 19.64% | |
| Max daily dropi | 17.44% | 14.85% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 25.82% | 28.53% |
| Category | COPX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Global X Copper Miners ETF | State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $6.33B | $3.69B |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.66% | 0.35% |
- Pure-play copper exposure to the energy transition's most critical metal — copper is essential for virtually every electrification application; EVs use 3-4x more copper than gas cars; solar and wind installations require significant copper wiring; grid upgrades for EV charging and renewable integration create sustained structural demand
- Freeport-McMoRan and Southern Copper are world-class operators with multi-decade mine lives — FCX's Grasberg mine in Indonesia and SCCO's Latin American operations are among the world's largest and lowest-cost copper operations; these companies benefit disproportionately from copper price increases given their massive production volumes
- Global mining company exposure including Canadian, Australian, and emerging market producers — COPX's global mandate allows exposure to the world's best copper deposits regardless of home stock market listing
- Diversified multi-metal exposure reduces single commodity price risk — XME's exposure across copper, steel, aluminum, gold, silver, and coal means no single commodity price determines performance; different metals' cycles offset each other to some degree
- Equal weighting provides small-cap metal mining leverage — equal-weighted methodology gives smaller copper, gold, and specialty metal miners significant portfolio weight; small miners tend to be more leveraged to commodity prices (higher beta) than large diversified miners, which can amplify returns in commodity bull markets
- Steel sector exposure adds industrial production cycle sensitivity — XME's steel exposure (Nucor, Steel Dynamics) provides exposure to U.S. construction and manufacturing activity independent of global commodity prices; U.S. steelmakers benefit from domestic construction spending and tariff protection from foreign steel imports
- Copper price volatility creates significant NAV swings — copper is priced on global commodity markets; Chinese economic health (China consumes approximately 50% of global copper) is the most important single factor; slowdowns in Chinese construction and manufacturing severely impact copper demand and COPX NAV
- Mine supply disruptions in Chile and Peru add event risk — Chile and Peru together produce approximately 40% of global copper; labor strikes (common at Chilean copper mines), water restrictions, and government royalty changes create supply disruptions and price spikes that benefit miners short-term but introduce operational risk
- Long permitting timelines limit new copper supply — new large-scale copper mines typically require 10-20 years from discovery to production; while this supports long-term copper prices, it also means the mining companies can face production growth constraints
- Broad multi-metal exposure means XME doesn't cleanly express any single commodity thesis — investors bullish specifically on copper or gold will find XME's diversification dilutes their thesis; single-commodity ETFs (COPX, GDX) provide purer exposure
- Equal weighting creates rebalancing overhead and potential small-company liquidity risk — equal weighting means XME must rebalance frequently as prices diverge; smaller mining companies with limited liquidity can be expensive to trade at their equal-weighted portfolio allocation
- Coal company inclusion may create ESG issues for some investors — XME holds metallurgical coal companies (coal used in steelmaking); while different from thermal coal (electricity generation), ESG-focused investors may object to any coal exposure
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on COPX and XME. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside COPX and XME, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.