KTEC vs QQQ Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
KTEC and QQQ sit in related but distinct corners of the ETF landscape — KTEC centers on concentrated, thematic exposure to AI-adjacent emerging technology companies, while QQQ focuses on the standard, most liquid way to hold the Nasdaq-100's mega-cap tech leaders. Investors choosing between them should weigh how each fund's strategy lines up with their own goals rather than assuming they're interchangeable.
Choosing between KTEC and QQQ comes down to which specific exposure — concentrated, thematic exposure to AI-adjacent emerging technology companies or the standard, most liquid way to hold the Nasdaq-100's mega-cap tech leaders — better matches the role you want this holding to play in a diversified portfolio.
QQQ holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. QQQ has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+18.86% vs -33.65% for KTEC).
- want concentrated, thematic exposure to AI-adjacent emerging technology companies
- prefer KraneShares's approach and fund lineup
- value concentrated, pure-play exposure to the AI infrastructure buildout theme
- are comfortable with newer fund with a much shorter track record than QQQ
- want the standard, most liquid way to hold the Nasdaq-100's mega-cap tech leaders
- prefer Invesco's approach and fund lineup
- value extremely deep liquidity and one of the most active options markets
- are comfortable with heavy concentration in a handful of mega-cap tech names
| Metric | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 21.1 | 29.0 |
| Latest closei | $11.49 | $709.80 |
| 1M returni | -4.17% | +0.83% |
| 3M returni | -11.55% | +2.19% |
| 6M returni | -21.41% | +9.63% |
| 1Y returni | -33.65% | +18.86% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.85K (-31.5%) started 2025-10-16 | $11.94K (+19.4%) started 2025-10-16 |
| 5Y ago | $6.34K (-36.6%) started 2021-10-18 | $20.23K (+102.3%) started 2021-10-18 |
| 10Y ago | $5.03K (-49.7%) started 2021-06-09 | $69.73K (+597.3%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.69% | 0.18% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $46.89M | $498.95B |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.43% | 0.42% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 16.04 | 27.18 |
| Betai | 0.47 | 1.24 |
| 52-week change | -33.65% | 18.86% |
| Metric | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | -33.65% | +18.86% |
| 6M returni | -21.41% | +9.63% |
| 3M returni | -11.55% | +2.19% |
| 1M returni | -4.17% | +0.83% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -1.61 | 0.75 |
| Betai | 0.47 | 1.24 |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.43% | 0.42% |
| 5Y CAGR | -9.54% | +14.46% |
Over the past year, KTEC and QQQ have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.47), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -33.65% | +18.86% |
| CAGRi | -33.67% | +18.87% | |
| Volatilityi | 26.29% | 19.80% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -1.61 | 0.75 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -2.21 | 1.09 | |
| Max drawdowni | 35.80% | 11.96% | |
| Current drawdowni | 35.35% | 6.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.53% | 3.19% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 21.65% | 4.03% | |
| Max daily dropi | 4.30% | 4.80% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.22% | 6.79% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -39.40% | +96.25% |
| CAGRi | -9.54% | +14.46% | |
| Volatilityi | 42.15% | 22.99% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.14 | 0.51 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.21 | 0.73 | |
| Max drawdowni | 58.93% | 35.12% | |
| Current drawdowni | 42.54% | 6.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 33.30% | 9.16% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 35.35% | 13.59% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.91% | 6.21% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 19.47% | 11.98% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | -51.89% | +550.19% |
| CAGRi | -12.78% | +20.60% | |
| Volatilityi | 42.10% | 22.58% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.23 | 0.75 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.35 | 1.05 | |
| Max drawdowni | 66.90% | 35.12% | |
| Current drawdowni | 53.70% | 6.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 44.28% | 6.23% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 45.89% | 10.38% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.91% | 11.98% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 19.47% | 16.20% |
| Category | KTEC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | Invesco QQQ Trust |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.69% | 0.18% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $46.89M | $498.95B |
| Dividend yieldi | 4.43% | 0.42% |
- Concentrated, pure-play exposure to the AI infrastructure buildout theme
- Can outperform broad tech funds during AI-specific rallies
- Diversified across semiconductors, software, and hardware AI plays
- Extremely deep liquidity and one of the most active options markets
- Direct exposure to the dominant AI, cloud, and mega-cap tech leaders
- Long, strong track record through multiple tech cycles
- Newer fund with a much shorter track record than QQQ
- Concentrated thematic bets carry higher single-theme risk
- Smaller asset base and liquidity than the broad-market QQQ
- Heavy concentration in a handful of mega-cap tech names
- Excludes financials entirely by index rule
- More volatile than the broad S&P 500 given its growth/tech tilt
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on KTEC and QQQ. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside KTEC and QQQ, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.