URNM vs URA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
URNM and URA sit in related but distinct corners of the ETF landscape — URNM centers on concentrated, pure-play exposure to uranium miners, while URA focuses on broader uranium and nuclear-power theme exposure. Investors choosing between them should weigh how each fund's strategy lines up with their own goals rather than assuming they're interchangeable.
Choosing between URNM and URA comes down to which specific exposure — concentrated, pure-play exposure to uranium miners or broader uranium and nuclear-power theme exposure — better matches the role you want this holding to play in a diversified portfolio.
URA holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. URNM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-31.61% vs -34.87% for URA).
- want concentrated, pure-play exposure to uranium miners
- prefer Sprott's approach and fund lineup
- value purer uranium-price leverage than diversified nuclear-energy funds
- are comfortable with extremely volatile, small, and concentrated fund
- want broader uranium and nuclear-power theme exposure
- prefer Global X's approach and fund lineup
- value slightly more diversified than the pure-miner-focused URNM
- are comfortable with still extremely volatile and concentrated in a niche industry
| Metric | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 26.9 | 26.2 |
| Latest closei | $43.78 | $36.12 |
| 1M returni | -13.13% | -13.53% |
| 3M returni | -10.23% | -7.65% |
| 6M returni | -37.03% | -34.65% |
| 1Y returni | -31.61% | -34.87% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $7.06K (-29.4%) started 2025-10-15 | $6.83K (-31.7%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $13.41K (+34.1%) started 2021-10-15 | $19.8K (+98.0%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $50.9K (+409.0%) started 2019-12-04 | $58.59K (+485.9%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.75% | 0.69% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.84B | $5.59B |
| Dividend yieldi | 3.66% | 5.21% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.03 | 21.56 |
| Betai | 1.05 | 1.25 |
| 52-week change | -31.61% | -34.87% |
| Metric | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | -31.61% | -34.87% |
| 6M returni | -37.03% | -34.65% |
| 3M returni | -10.23% | -7.65% |
| 1M returni | -13.13% | -13.53% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -0.53 | -0.66 |
| Betai | 1.05 | 1.25 |
| Dividend yieldi | 3.66% | 5.21% |
| 5Y CAGR | +2.53% | +9.82% |
Over the past year, URNM and URA have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.96), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -31.61% | -34.87% |
| CAGRi | -31.62% | -34.89% | |
| Volatilityi | 53.70% | 51.67% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.53 | -0.66 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.74 | -0.92 | |
| Max drawdowni | 49.49% | 42.50% | |
| Current drawdowni | 47.87% | 41.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 24.05% | 20.86% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 27.15% | 22.97% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.45% | 9.88% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.95% | 17.41% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +13.32% | +59.76% |
| CAGRi | +2.53% | +9.82% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.10% | 43.25% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.19 | 0.33 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.28 | 0.48 | |
| Max drawdowni | 50.78% | 42.50% | |
| Current drawdowni | 47.87% | 41.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 22.82% | 17.79% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 25.81% | 20.80% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.34% | 11.23% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.24% | 18.67% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +317.57% | +298.70% |
| CAGRi | +23.15% | +14.84% | |
| Volatilityi | 46.92% | 38.54% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.58 | 0.44 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.88 | 0.65 | |
| Max drawdowni | 50.78% | 61.45% | |
| Current drawdowni | 47.87% | 41.56% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.07% | 22.70% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 22.92% | 26.22% | |
| Max daily dropi | 10.34% | 11.23% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 20.24% | 21.13% |
| Category | URNM | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | Global X Uranium ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.75% | 0.69% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $1.84B | $5.59B |
| Dividend yieldi | 3.66% | 5.21% |
- Purer uranium-price leverage than diversified nuclear-energy funds
- Direct beneficiary of the global nuclear-power revival narrative
- Backed by Sprott's specialized commodity and mining expertise
- Slightly more diversified than the pure-miner-focused URNM
- Direct beneficiary of the global nuclear-power revival narrative
- Longer track record than newer uranium-themed competitors
- Extremely volatile, small, and concentrated fund
- Uranium prices are driven by a thin, opaque physical market
- Geopolitical supply concentration (Kazakhstan, Russia) adds risk
- Still extremely volatile and concentrated in a niche industry
- Uranium prices depend on a thin, opaque physical market
- Overlaps significantly with URNM's core mining holdings
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on URNM and URA. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside URNM and URA, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.