ACWI vs VT Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ACWI and VT both target global equity exposure but take different paths to get there — ACWI via the MSCI ACWI Index, and VT via the FTSE Global All Cap Index. The practical differences come down to issuer, cost structure, and the specific index rules each fund follows, since both are pursuing a similar investment outcome.
ACWI vs VT is largely a question of which issuer and index methodology you trust more for global equity exposure — the underlying investment case is similar, so cost, liquidity, and tracking precision tend to be the deciding factors.
VT holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. ACWI has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+16.68% vs +16.61% for VT).
- want one-fund exposure to the entire global stock market, US included
- prefer iShares (BlackRock)'s approach and fund lineup
- value single holding for total global equity diversification
- are comfortable with heavily weighted toward the US given its share of global market cap
- want the lowest-cost, single-fund solution for total global equity exposure
- prefer Vanguard's approach and fund lineup
- value extremely low cost for total global market exposure
- are comfortable with around 60% US-weighted, so it isn't a true diversification hedge from US risk
| Metric | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 26.9 | 26.9 |
| Latest closei | $159.23 | $158.31 |
| 1M returni | +0.65% | +0.43% |
| 3M returni | +1.84% | +1.66% |
| 6M returni | +7.63% | +7.06% |
| 1Y returni | +16.68% | +16.61% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.85K (+18.5%) started 2025-10-15 | $11.86K (+18.6%) started 2025-10-15 |
| 5Y ago | $18.35K (+83.5%) started 2021-10-15 | $18.4K (+84.0%) started 2021-10-15 |
| 10Y ago | $40.58K (+305.8%) started 2016-10-17 | $41.31K (+313.1%) started 2016-10-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.32% | 0.06% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $32.83B | $101.18B |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.41% | 1.53% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 20.70 | 20.46 |
| Betai | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| 52-week change | 16.68% | 16.61% |
| Metric | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +16.68% | +16.61% |
| 6M returni | +7.63% | +7.06% |
| 3M returni | +1.84% | +1.66% |
| 1M returni | +0.65% | +0.43% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Betai | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.41% | 1.53% |
| 5Y CAGR | +10.88% | +10.65% |
Over the past year, ACWI and VT have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 1.00), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +16.68% | +16.61% |
| CAGRi | +16.69% | +16.62% | |
| Volatilityi | 13.97% | 13.92% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.86 | 0.85 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.26 | 1.26 | |
| Max drawdowni | 9.73% | 9.67% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.00% | 2.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 1.56% | 1.57% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 2.38% | 2.39% | |
| Max daily dropi | 2.98% | 3.07% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 4.04% | 4.00% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +67.61% | +65.83% |
| CAGRi | +10.88% | +10.65% | |
| Volatilityi | 16.22% | 16.20% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.44 | 0.43 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.64 | 0.62 | |
| Max drawdowni | 26.42% | 26.38% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.00% | 2.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 5.91% | 6.00% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.89% | 8.96% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.12% | 5.96% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.31% | 11.32% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +231.31% | +227.88% |
| CAGRi | +12.74% | +12.62% | |
| Volatilityi | 17.06% | 17.17% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.53 | 0.52 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.73 | 0.72 | |
| Max drawdowni | 33.53% | 34.24% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.00% | 2.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 4.82% | 4.92% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 7.69% | 7.80% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.22% | 11.64% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.77% | 19.29% |
| Category | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.32% | 0.06% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $32.83B | $101.18B |
| Dividend yieldi | 1.41% | 1.53% |
- Single holding for total global equity diversification
- Includes both US and international, developed and emerging markets
- Simplifies portfolio construction into one core fund
- Extremely low cost for total global market exposure
- Includes small-caps that some global funds exclude
- The simplest possible one-fund global equity portfolio
- Heavily weighted toward the US given its share of global market cap
- Higher expense ratio than building the equivalent with separate funds
- Less flexibility to tilt geographic exposure than multi-fund approaches
- Around 60% US-weighted, so it isn't a true diversification hedge from US risk
- Less control over regional tilts than separate US/international funds
- Emerging-market slice adds currency and volatility risk
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on ACWI and VT. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside ACWI and VT, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.