HPE vs CSCO Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
HPE and Cisco compete in enterprise networking (HPE Aruba vs Cisco Catalyst) but are primarily non-overlapping: HPE is an AI server and hybrid cloud infrastructure company, while Cisco is a networking software and security company transitioning to a subscription model. Both have AI tailwinds — HPE from AI server demand, Cisco from AI Ethernet networking — but their business models and risk profiles differ significantly.
HPE vs Cisco is a comparison between an infrastructure hardware company transitioning to as-a-service and a dominant networking company transitioning to software subscriptions — both narratives require execution on business model change, with Cisco's larger installed base and Splunk security franchise providing more diversified transition support.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- prefer a server and HPC infrastructure company with AI workload exposure via GPU systems and Cray
- value the GreenLake as-a-service model as a differentiated alternative to public cloud for regulated industries
- want enterprise infrastructure exposure without the networking market concentration of Cisco
- are comfortable with lower near-term margins from AI server hardware cost pass-through
- prefer the dominant enterprise networking franchise with an enormous installed base and software attach opportunity
- value Splunk's security observability platform as a major cross-sell opportunity into Cisco's customer base
- want a mature, high-free-cash-flow technology company with a growing dividend and buyback program
- are comfortable with near-term revenue headwinds from inventory digestion and the ratable revenue transition
| Metric | HPE | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | N/A | N/A |
| AI ranki | N/A | N/A |
| Latest closei | N/A | N/A |
| 1M returni | N/A | N/A |
| 6M returni | N/A | N/A |
| 1Y returni | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | HPE | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | N/A | N/A |
| Trailing P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | N/A | N/A |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | N/A | N/A |
| Analyst targeti | N/A | N/A |
| Target upsidei | N/A | N/A |
| Metric | HPE | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | N/A | N/A |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growthi | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margini | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margini | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margini | N/A | N/A |
| ROIC proxyi | N/A | N/A |
| Return on equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/equityi | N/A | N/A |
| Current ratioi | N/A | N/A |
| Quick ratioi | N/A | N/A |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HPE | CSCO |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 5Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| 10Y | Growthi | N/A | N/A |
| CAGRi | N/A | N/A | |
| Volatilityi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sharpe ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Sortino ratioi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Current drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Avg drawdowni | N/A | N/A | |
| Ulcer Indexi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max daily dropi | N/A | N/A | |
| Max wkly dropi | N/A | N/A |
| Category | HPE | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | HPE provides enterprise servers, storage, networking (Aruba), and the GreenLake hybrid cloud platform. AI-focused infrastructure including ProLiant GPU servers and Cray HPC systems are growing drivers. GreenLake delivers infrastructure as a service, building annual recurring revenue from enterprise and government customers who prefer consuming IT as a managed service rather than owning assets. | Cisco Systems is the dominant enterprise networking company, providing routers, switches, firewalls, wireless access points, and software-defined networking across campus, branch, data center, and service provider environments. Cisco is transitioning from hardware-led perpetual license sales to a recurring software and subscription model across Catalyst (campus), Nexus (data center), Webex (collaboration), and Splunk (security observability) platforms. AI infrastructure networking — particularly Ethernet switching for AI GPU clusters — is an emerging growth area. |
| Investor focus | Investors track GreenLake ARR growth, AI/HPC server backlog, operating margin improvement, and the pace of enterprise adoption of hybrid cloud as-a-service. | Investors focus on annualized recurring revenue (ARR) growth as the software/subscription transition progresses, Splunk integration and cross-sell into security observability, AI networking demand for Ethernet-based GPU cluster interconnect, and operating margin sustainability during the hardware-to-software transition. |
- Cray HPC systems serve strategic government and research markets with long contract lifecycles
- GreenLake creates switching costs as customers integrate their IT operations into the platform
- Aruba networking competes effectively in enterprise WLAN and campus switching with strong software attach rates
- Dominant market share in enterprise routing and switching creates an enormous installed base for software subscription attach
- Splunk acquisition adds the leading enterprise security observability platform, opening a large upsell opportunity into the security budget
- AI Ethernet networking (Nexus 9000 series) is positioned to benefit as hyperscalers explore Ethernet alternatives to InfiniBand for AI clusters
- GreenLake ARR has grown slower than initial targets, questioning the pace of enterprise as-a-service adoption
- AI server margins are compressed by GPU hardware costs, and HPE trails Dell in market share for AI PowerEdge-type systems
- Cisco and Juniper directly compete with Aruba in enterprise networking
- Product order digestion from the COVID-era supply chain surge has created a multi-quarter revenue headwind as customers work through inventory
- The software transition reduces near-term revenue recognition (ratable vs upfront), creating a period of reported revenue weakness that masks underlying health
- Juniper/HPE Aruba and Arista compete in enterprise switching; InfiniBand and RoCE compete in AI cluster networking
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.