HPE vs NTAP Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
HPE and NetApp overlap in enterprise storage but operate from very different strategic positions: HPE is a broad infrastructure vendor for which storage is one segment, while NetApp is a pure-play storage company whose ONTAP platform spans on-premises and cloud. NetApp's cloud storage ARR growth and consistent free cash flow make it a more focused investment for enterprise storage exposure; HPE offers a broader infrastructure bet.
Choosing between HPE and NTAP in the storage context comes down to a focused storage compounder (NetApp) versus a diversified infrastructure provider (HPE) — if storage and hybrid cloud data management is the thesis, NetApp is the cleaner expression; if broader AI infrastructure is the thesis, HPE's compute and HPC exposure adds dimensions NetApp lacks.
HPE holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. HPE leads on both 1-year return (+164.86%) and forward P/E (12.05x vs 16.39x for NTAP), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, HPE is growing revenue faster (40.00%), while NTAP maintains the higher operating margin (27.26%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for HPE (+33.13%) than for NTAP (+6.27%).
- →prefer a diversified enterprise infrastructure company with compute, networking, and storage exposure
- →value AI server and HPC revenue as growth drivers beyond storage alone
- →want the GreenLake as-a-service model as a path to recurring revenue across the full infrastructure stack
- →are comfortable with lower storage-specific margins in exchange for broader AI infrastructure upside
- →prefer a pure-play enterprise storage and data management company with a clear hybrid cloud strategy
- →value ONTAP's cloud-native services on AWS, Azure, and GCP as high-margin recurring revenue
- →want consistent free cash flow returned via buybacks and dividends from a profitable, focused business
- →are comfortable with slower growth in a mature on-premises storage market in exchange for cloud attach revenue
| Metric | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 62.4 | 62.7 |
| AI rank | #126 | #92 |
| Latest close | $47.41 | $159.71 |
| 1M return | +45.34% | +32.44% |
| 6M return | +97.38% | +43.93% |
| 1Y return | +164.86% | +54.76% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $26.66K (+166.6%) started 2025-06-18 | $15.54K (+55.4%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $40.61K (+306.1%) started 2021-06-21 | $24.56K (+145.6%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $71.79K (+617.9%) started 2016-06-20 | $103.07K (+930.7%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $63.79B | $31.66B |
| Trailing P/E | 45.02 | 25.45 |
| Forward P/E | 12.05 | 16.39 |
| Price/Sales | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 2.06 | 4.45 |
| Analyst target | $64.13 | $171.75 |
| Target upside | +33.13% | +6.27% |
| Metric | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 40.00% | 12.50% |
| Earnings growth | -30.30% | 23.40% |
| EPS growth | -30.30% | +23.40% |
| FCF margin | +9.89% | +18.70% |
| Operating margin | 8.70% | 27.26% |
| Profit margin | 4.01% | 18.43% |
| ROIC proxy | 6.31% | 106.73% |
| Return on equity | 6.31% | 106.73% |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 1.29% |
| Beta | 1.45 | 1.43 |
| Debt/equity | 84.03 | 202.29 |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 1.44 |
| Quick ratio | 0.57 | 1.21 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +166.65% | +55.44% |
| CAGR | +167.02% | +55.53% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.16 | 1.18 | |
| Max drawdown | 23.81% | 25.52% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.14% | 9.37% | |
| Max wkly drop | 17.52% | 12.07% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +260.51% | +121.70% |
| CAGR | +29.29% | +17.29% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.74 | 0.51 | |
| Max drawdown | 48.36% | 42.61% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.14% | 15.57% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.76% | 23.79% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +440.92% | +695.55% |
| CAGR | +18.40% | +23.06% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.52 | 0.63 | |
| Max drawdown | 56.87% | 58.08% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.31% | 20.22% | |
| Max wkly drop | 28.21% | 23.79% |
| Category | HPE | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | NetApp, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | HPE provides enterprise servers, storage, networking, and hybrid cloud via its GreenLake platform. Its storage products (Alletra, Primera) compete with NetApp in enterprise all-flash and hybrid storage arrays. HPE's broader portfolio includes AI servers (ProLiant with NVIDIA GPUs), Cray HPC, and Aruba networking, making storage one segment among many rather than a core identity. | NetApp is an enterprise storage and data management company providing all-flash arrays (AFF), hybrid cloud storage (ONTAP), and cloud storage services across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Its ONTAP operating system runs on-premises and natively in public cloud as FSx for NetApp ONTAP (AWS), Azure NetApp Files, and Google Cloud NetApp Volumes, creating a unified storage platform across hybrid environments. NetApp also earns subscription revenue from storage management software and support. |
| Investor focus | Investors track GreenLake ARR growth, server and HPC backlog, and total segment profitability — HPE is not primarily a storage story, so storage performance is one of several data points in a broader infrastructure narrative. | Investors focus on cloud storage services ARR growth (high-margin SaaS-like revenue from hyperscaler-hosted ONTAP), on-premises all-flash array revenue versus flash peers, gross margin expansion as cloud services mix increases, and free cash flow generation relative to the dividend and buyback program. |
- →GreenLake storage-as-a-service gives HPE a recurring storage revenue model similar to NetApp's managed services
- →Broad enterprise relationships across compute, networking, and storage enable bundled deals that pure-play storage vendors cannot match
- →AI server business creates cross-sell opportunities for HPE storage used in AI training and inference data pipelines
- →ONTAP cloud services on AWS, Azure, and GCP create high-margin recurring revenue that grows with hyperscaler adoption
- →ONTAP's feature richness (snapshots, deduplication, NAS/SAN unification) creates deep customer lock-in
- →Strong free cash flow generation supports a generous buyback program and dividend, rewarding shareholders directly
- →Storage is not HPE's primary differentiator, and NetApp, Pure Storage, and Dell all compete aggressively in enterprise flash storage
- →GreenLake storage attach rates have not been disclosed separately, making progress difficult to measure
- →HPE's storage margins have faced pressure from all-flash transition and competitive pricing
- →On-premises storage market is mature and competitive, with Pure Storage and HPE Alletra gaining share in all-flash
- →Cloud storage revenue growth depends on hyperscaler ONTAP adoption, which competes against native cloud storage services
- →AI training storage requirements may favor GPU-accelerated flash vendors with different protocols over ONTAP-based solutions
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.