LIVE
MU
Micron Technology · Technology
$864.01
+29.62% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices · Technology
$466.38
+10.68% this month
AI Score
80.6vs81.1
AMD ↑1Y Return
+736.81%vs+293.30%
MU ↑Forward P/E
9.22xvs39.68x
MU ↑Target Upside
-27.60%vs-8.51%
AMD ↑Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
MU
3
AMD
2
Metrics last refreshed: 6/6/2026
Quick take
MU vs AMD: Memory Meets AI Chips — Which Semiconductor Wins?: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Micron is a commodity memory play with a critical AI angle via HBM supply, while AMD is a logic semiconductor company with a growing but still challenger AI accelerator position alongside a strong CPU business. MU offers more cyclical leverage; AMD offers more diversified growth.
Use this MU vs AMD comparison to distinguish between AI memory infrastructure (MU) and AI compute logic (AMD). Both benefit from AI capex growth but through different mechanisms — memory pricing and HBM supply for Micron, accelerator share gain and CPU leadership for AMD.
Live analysis · updated 6/6/2026
MU holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. MU leads on both 1-year return (+736.81%) and forward P/E (9.22x vs 39.68x for AMD), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. MU leads on both revenue growth (196.30%) and operating margin (67.62%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for AMD (-8.51%) than for MU (-27.60%).
Comparison scoreboard
MU LEADS 3/5AI Score
MU 80.6
AMD ✓81.1
1Y Return
MU ✓+736.81%
AMD +293.30%
Fwd P/E
MU ✓9.22
AMD 39.68
Target Up.
MU -27.60%
AMD ✓-8.51%
Op. Margin
MU ✓67.62%
AMD 14.40%
Normalized 1Y performance
MU
AMD
Recent returns
MU
AMD
Analyst price targets & sentiment
MU · 33 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Buy (1.5/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$60.00
analyst mean$702.98
current price$864.01
-27.6% upside to analyst mean
AMD · 48 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Strong Buy (1.5/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$225.00
analyst high$625.00
analyst mean$472.17
current price$466.38
-8.5% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
MU may suit investors who:
- →Want leveraged exposure to AI infrastructure through the memory and HBM bottleneck
- →Believe the DRAM and NAND pricing cycle is in recovery with room to run
- →Are comfortable with memory's inherent cyclicality in exchange for high operating leverage
- →Want a lower valuation entry point into the AI semiconductor theme
AMD may suit investors who:
- →Want diversified semiconductor exposure across AI accelerators, CPUs, and gaming
- →Prefer a challenger AI GPU story with share-gain potential vs NVIDIA
- →Value AMD's EPYC data center CPU franchise as a durable growth driver
- →Prefer logic semiconductor economics (more stable margins) over memory cyclicality
Performance & AI score
| Metric | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 80.6 | 81.1 |
| AI rank | #9 | #6 |
| Latest close | $864.01 | $466.38 |
| 1M return | +29.62% | +10.68% |
| 6M return | +281.21% | +115.94% |
| 1Y return | +736.81% | +293.30% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $81.29K (+712.9%) started 2025-06-05 | $40.31K (+303.1%) started 2025-06-05 |
| 5Y ago | $107.61K (+976.1%) started 2021-06-07 | $57.33K (+473.3%) started 2021-06-07 |
| 10Y ago | $708.19K (+6981.9%) started 2016-06-06 | $1.04M (+10333.6%) started 2016-06-06 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.1T | $841.55B |
| Trailing P/E | 45.87 | 172.61 |
| Forward P/E | 9.22 | 39.68 |
| Price/Sales | 3.87 | 24.30 |
| EV/Revenue | 18.78 | 22.24 |
| Analyst target | $702.98 | $472.17 |
| Target upside | -27.60% | -8.51% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 196.30% | 37.80% |
| Earnings growth | 756.00% | 91.20% |
| EPS growth | +756.00% | +91.20% |
| FCF margin | +4.98% | +19.15% |
| Operating margin | 67.62% | 14.40% |
| Profit margin | 41.49% | 13.37% |
| ROIC proxy | 39.82% | 8.06% |
| Return on equity | 39.82% | 8.06% |
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | N/A |
| Beta | 1.92 | 2.40 |
| Debt/equity | 14.90 | 6.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.90 | 2.73 |
| Quick ratio | 2.23 | 1.75 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
MU max drawdown30.31%
AMD max drawdown27.76%
MU max wkly drop20.42%
AMD max wkly drop23.67%
5Y risk snapshot
MU max drawdown57.63%
AMD max drawdown65.45%
MU max wkly drop26.73%
AMD max wkly drop23.91%
10Y risk snapshot
MU max drawdown57.63%
AMD max drawdown65.45%
MU max wkly drop27.76%
AMD max wkly drop32.68%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +712.88% | +303.13% |
| CAGR | +715.32% | +303.93% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 3.38 | 2.38 | |
| Max drawdown | 30.31% | 27.76% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.25% | 17.31% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.42% | 23.67% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +951.63% | +473.30% |
| CAGR | +60.17% | +41.85% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.07 | 0.83 | |
| Max drawdown | 57.63% | 65.45% | |
| Max daily drop | 16.18% | 17.31% | |
| Max wkly drop | 26.73% | 23.91% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +6820.81% | +10333.56% |
| CAGR | +52.78% | +59.19% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.01 | 1.02 | |
| Max drawdown | 57.63% | 65.45% | |
| Max daily drop | 19.82% | 24.23% | |
| Max wkly drop | 27.76% | 32.68% |
Business comparison
| Category | MU | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Micron Technology | Advanced Micro Devices |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Core business | Designer and manufacturer of DRAM, NAND flash, and High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) used in AI accelerators, data centers, PCs, and mobile devices. | Designer of CPUs, GPUs, and AI accelerators for data centers, PCs, gaming, and embedded markets. MI300X AI GPU targets NVIDIA's H100/H200 in the accelerator market. |
| Investor focus | HBM3E supply ramp for AI accelerators (NVIDIA, AMD), data center DRAM pricing cycle, gross margin recovery, and capacity investment vs competitor supply discipline. | MI300X AI accelerator adoption and data center GPU revenue growth, EPYC CPU share gains against Intel, client and gaming recovery, and margin trajectory. |
MU strengths
- →One of only three companies able to supply HBM — a critical AI bottleneck
- →Strong data center DRAM and HBM revenue ramp tied directly to AI capex
- →Gross margin leverage as the memory pricing cycle recovers
AMD strengths
- →Growing AI accelerator opportunity with MI300X gaining enterprise traction
- →Strong EPYC CPU share gains in data center — largest market share shift vs Intel in years
- →Diversified chip exposure across data center, client, gaming, and embedded
Risks to watch — MU
- →Memory pricing cycles are inherently volatile — demand swings affect revenue sharply
- →Samsung and SK Hynix HBM supply expansion could pressure pricing
- →Capital-intensity of leading-edge DRAM and HBM manufacturing
Risks to watch — AMD
- →AI GPU execution and scale vs NVIDIA's entrenched CUDA software ecosystem
- →Cyclical demand risk in PC and gaming segments
- →Margin pressure in a competitive multi-front semiconductor environment
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
More public stock comparisons
AAPL vs MSFTApple Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation
CEG vs VSTConstellation Energy Corporation vs Vistra Corp.
CRWD vs PANWCrowdStrike Holdings vs Palo Alto Networks
IONQ vs QBTSIonQ vs D-Wave Quantum Inc.
LITE vs COHRLumentum Holdings Inc. vs Coherent Corp.
NVDA vs AMDNVIDIA Corporation vs Advanced Micro Devices
COST vs WMTCostco Wholesale Corporation vs Walmart Inc.
TSLA vs RIVNTesla vs Rivian Automotive
NVDA vs INTCNVIDIA Corporation vs Intel Corporation
MSFT vs GOOGLMicrosoft Corporation vs Alphabet Inc.
META vs SNAPMeta Platforms vs Snap Inc.
NFLX vs DISNetflix vs The Walt Disney Company
UBER vs LYFTUber Technologies vs Lyft
JPM vs GSJPMorgan Chase & Co. vs The Goldman Sachs Group
V vs MAVisa Inc. vs Mastercard Incorporated
AMZN vs GOOGLAmazon.com vs Alphabet Inc.
XOM vs CVXExxon Mobil Corporation vs Chevron Corporation
SQ vs PYPLBlock vs PayPal Holdings
ABNB vs BKNGAirbnb vs Booking Holdings
NVO vs LLYNovo Nordisk A/S vs Eli Lilly and Company
NET vs ZSCloudflare vs Zscaler
APP vs TTDAppLovin Corporation vs The Trade Desk
SMCI vs DELLSuper Micro Computer vs Dell Technologies Inc.
RBLX vs URoblox Corporation vs Unity Software Inc.
MELI vs SEMercadoLibre vs Sea Limited
ARM vs QCOMArm Holdings plc vs Qualcomm Incorporated
SPOT vs AAPLSpotify Technology S.A. vs Apple Inc.
DKNG vs MGMDraftKings Inc. vs MGM Resorts International
PLTR vs AIPalantir Technologies Inc. vs C3.ai