LIVE
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company · Semiconductors / Foundry
$427.44
+3.83% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation · Semiconductors / AI
$208.64
-3.05% this month
AI Score
80.2vs88.9
NVDA ↑1Y Return
+109.05%vs+47.22%
TSM ↑Forward P/E
21.87xvs16.17x
NVDA ↑Target Upside
+9.53%vs+45.50%
NVDA ↑Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
TSM
1
NVDA
3
Metrics last refreshed: 6/9/2026
Quick take
TSM vs NVDA: TSMC vs NVIDIA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
TSMC and NVIDIA are the two most critical companies in the AI semiconductor supply chain — NVIDIA designs the AI chips and TSMC manufactures them. They are partners, not competitors. The investment choice is between the chip designer capturing enormous AI-driven demand (NVIDIA, higher multiple) and the world's only manufacturer capable of making those chips at scale (TSMC, lower multiple but irreplaceable strategic position).
Use this TSM vs NVDA comparison to choose between the AI chip design leader and the AI chip manufacturing monopoly. NVIDIA has higher revenue growth and is the primary AI compute brand; TSMC benefits from every major AI chip without the design or software execution risk, at a lower valuation multiple.
Live analysis · updated 6/9/2026
NVDA holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. TSM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+109.05% vs +47.22%), though NVDA trades at the lower forward P/E (16.17x vs 21.87x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NVDA (+45.50%) than for TSM (+9.53%).
Comparison scoreboard
NVDA LEADS 3/5AI Score
TSM 80.2
NVDA ✓88.9
1Y Return
TSM ✓+109.05%
NVDA +47.22%
Fwd P/E
TSM 21.87
NVDA ✓16.17
Target Up.
TSM +9.53%
NVDA ✓+45.50%
Op. Margin
TSM N/A
NVDA 65.60%
Normalized 1Y performance
TSM
NVDA
Recent returns
TSM
NVDA
Analyst price targets & sentiment
TSM · 18 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Strong Buy (1.5/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$354.00
analyst high$600.00
analyst mean$467.84
current price$427.44
+9.5% upside to analyst mean
NVDA · 58 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Strong Buy (1.3/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$180.00
analyst high$500.00
analyst mean$298.42
current price$208.64
+45.5% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
TSM may suit investors who:
- →Want exposure to AI chip demand without the software and design execution risk of the chip designers
- →Value TSMC's irreplaceable foundry position — a true structural monopoly in advanced semiconductor manufacturing
- →Prefer a lower valuation multiple than NVIDIA in exchange for broadly diversified customer exposure
- →Are comfortable with geopolitical risk around Taiwan as the primary structural risk factor
NVDA may suit investors who:
- →Want the dominant AI compute brand with the CUDA software ecosystem moat
- →Believe data center GPU demand will remain elevated as AI training and inference workloads grow
- →Value the software platform advantage that creates switching costs beyond the hardware itself
- →Are comfortable with a high valuation that prices in continued AI infrastructure growth
Performance & AI score
| Metric | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 80.2 | 88.9 |
| AI rank | #14 | #3 |
| Latest close | $427.44 | $208.64 |
| 1M return | +3.83% | -3.05% |
| 6M return | +42.38% | +14.38% |
| 1Y return | +109.05% | +47.22% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $21.16K (+111.6%) started 2025-06-09 | $14.63K (+46.3%) started 2025-06-09 |
| 5Y ago | $43.23K (+332.3%) started 2021-06-09 | $120.72K (+1107.2%) started 2021-06-09 |
| 10Y ago | $285.63K (+2756.3%) started 2016-06-09 | $1.83M (+18168.2%) started 2016-06-09 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.22T | $4.97T |
| Trailing P/E | 36.66 | 31.46 |
| Forward P/E | 21.87 | 16.17 |
| Price/Sales | 0.54 | 23.66 |
| EV/Revenue | 3.77 | 19.42 |
| Analyst target | $467.84 | $298.42 |
| Target upside | +9.53% | +45.50% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 35.10% | 85.20% |
| Earnings growth | 58.40% | 214.50% |
| EPS growth | +58.40% | +214.50% |
| FCF margin | +17.52% | +18.28% |
| Operating margin | N/A | 65.60% |
| Profit margin | 46.51% | 62.97% |
| ROIC proxy | 36.21% | 114.29% |
| Return on equity | 36.21% | 114.29% |
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 0.49% |
| Beta | 1.25 | 2.20 |
| Debt/equity | 18.45 | 6.55 |
| Current ratio | 2.49 | 3.44 |
| Quick ratio | 2.19 | 2.14 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
TSM max drawdown18.14%
NVDA max drawdown20.22%
TSM max wkly drop10.46%
NVDA max wkly drop10.72%
5Y risk snapshot
TSM max drawdown56.47%
NVDA max drawdown66.34%
TSM max wkly drop16.17%
NVDA max wkly drop22.20%
10Y risk snapshot
TSM max drawdown56.47%
NVDA max drawdown66.34%
TSM max wkly drop16.17%
NVDA max wkly drop28.36%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +109.05% | +46.28% |
| CAGR | +109.16% | +46.51% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.10 | 1.15 | |
| Max drawdown | 18.14% | 20.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.69% | 6.20% | |
| Max wkly drop | 10.46% | 10.72% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +296.48% | +1104.43% |
| CAGR | +31.72% | +64.53% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.81 | 1.14 | |
| Max drawdown | 56.47% | 66.34% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.33% | 16.97% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.17% | 22.20% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +2021.70% | +17837.44% |
| CAGR | +35.73% | +68.05% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.94 | 1.20 | |
| Max drawdown | 56.47% | 66.34% | |
| Max daily drop | 14.03% | 18.76% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.17% | 28.36% |
Business comparison
| Category | TSM | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | NVIDIA Corporation |
| Sector | Semiconductors / Foundry | Technology |
| Industry | N/A | Semiconductors |
| Core business | World's largest and most advanced semiconductor contract manufacturer. Produces chips designed by Apple, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm, Broadcom, and virtually every major fabless chip company. Leading-edge nodes include 3nm and 2nm. Building new fabs in Arizona, Japan, and Germany. | Designer of GPUs for gaming, data center AI training and inference, autonomous vehicles, and robotics. Blackwell architecture powers the latest H200/B200/GB200 data center products. CUDA software ecosystem is a critical competitive moat. Revenue driven primarily by Data Center segment. |
| Investor focus | Advanced node (3nm/2nm) capacity utilisation, AI chip production ramp for NVIDIA and AMD, geographic diversification of fab capacity, and gross margin sustainability. | Data center GPU demand from hyperscalers and enterprises, Blackwell supply ramp, CUDA ecosystem durability, automotive and robotics revenue growth, and margin trajectory. |
TSM strengths
- →Irreplaceable position in advanced semiconductor manufacturing — no competitor is within 2-3 process generations at scale
- →Every major AI chip (NVIDIA H100/H200/B200, AMD MI300, Apple Silicon) is manufactured exclusively by TSMC
- →Geographic diversification into Arizona and Japan reduces long-term supply chain concentration risk
NVDA strengths
- →Dominant AI training and inference GPU platform — CUDA is the de facto standard for AI developers globally
- →Blackwell architecture delivers step-change performance improvements, driving continued upgrade cycles from cloud customers
- →Software ecosystem (CUDA, cuDNN, TensorRT) creates a deep moat that AMD and Intel cannot quickly replicate
Risks to watch — TSM
- →Taiwan geopolitical risk is the central long-term risk factor — any conflict would disrupt global semiconductor supply
- →Arizona and Japan fabs have been more expensive and slower to ramp than Taiwan operations
- →Customer concentration — Apple is the largest customer; NVIDIA AI chip demand is now a major driver
Risks to watch — NVDA
- →Hyperscaler customers (Google, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft) are all developing custom AI chips that could partially substitute NVIDIA GPUs
- →Very high revenue concentration in data center GPU — a demand pause or inventory build would sharply impact earnings
- →Export controls restrict sales to China — a major revenue loss that competitors in China could fill over time
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
All stock comparisons
AAPL vs MSFTApple Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation
CEG vs VSTConstellation Energy Corporation vs Vistra Corp.
CRWD vs PANWCrowdStrike Holdings vs Palo Alto Networks
IONQ vs QBTSIonQ vs D-Wave Quantum Inc.
LITE vs COHRLumentum Holdings Inc. vs Coherent Corp.
NVDA vs AMDNVIDIA Corporation vs Advanced Micro Devices
MU vs AMDMicron Technology vs Advanced Micro Devices
COST vs WMTCostco Wholesale Corporation vs Walmart Inc.
TSLA vs RIVNTesla vs Rivian Automotive
NVDA vs INTCNVIDIA Corporation vs Intel Corporation
MSFT vs GOOGLMicrosoft Corporation vs Alphabet Inc.
META vs SNAPMeta Platforms vs Snap Inc.
NFLX vs DISNetflix vs The Walt Disney Company
UBER vs LYFTUber Technologies vs Lyft
JPM vs GSJPMorgan Chase & Co. vs The Goldman Sachs Group
V vs MAVisa Inc. vs Mastercard Incorporated
AMZN vs GOOGLAmazon.com vs Alphabet Inc.
XOM vs CVXExxon Mobil Corporation vs Chevron Corporation
SQ vs PYPLBlock vs PayPal Holdings
ABNB vs BKNGAirbnb vs Booking Holdings
NVO vs LLYNovo Nordisk A/S vs Eli Lilly and Company
NET vs ZSCloudflare vs Zscaler
APP vs TTDAppLovin Corporation vs The Trade Desk
SMCI vs DELLSuper Micro Computer vs Dell Technologies Inc.
RBLX vs URoblox Corporation vs Unity Software Inc.
MELI vs SEMercadoLibre vs Sea Limited
ARM vs QCOMArm Holdings plc vs Qualcomm Incorporated
SPOT vs AAPLSpotify Technology S.A. vs Apple Inc.
DKNG vs MGMDraftKings Inc. vs MGM Resorts International
PLTR vs AIPalantir Technologies Inc. vs C3.ai
JPM vs BACJPMorgan Chase & Co. vs Bank of America Corporation
KO vs PEPThe Coca-Cola Company vs PepsiCo
F vs GMFord Motor Company vs General Motors Company
META vs GOOGLMeta Platforms vs Alphabet Inc.
WMT vs AMZNWalmart Inc. vs Amazon.com
ADBE vs CRMAdobe Inc. vs Salesforce
AMD vs INTCAdvanced Micro Devices vs Intel Corporation
PFE vs MRNAPfizer Inc. vs Moderna
BA vs LMTThe Boeing Company vs Lockheed Martin Corporation
SBUX vs MCDStarbucks Corporation vs McDonald's Corporation
HD vs LOWThe Home Depot vs Lowe's Companies
TSLA vs FTesla vs Ford Motor Company
AMZN vs MSFTAmazon.com vs Microsoft Corporation
SNOW vs PLTRSnowflake Inc. vs Palantir Technologies Inc.
RIVN vs LCIDRivian Automotive vs Lucid Group
COIN vs HOODCoinbase Global vs Robinhood Markets
CRM vs NOWSalesforce vs ServiceNow
CAT vs DECaterpillar Inc. vs Deere & Company
BAC vs WFCBank of America Corporation vs Wells Fargo & Company
SHOP vs AMZNShopify Inc. vs Amazon.com
BX vs KKRBlackstone Inc. vs KKR & Co. Inc.
MARA vs RIOTMARA Holdings vs Riot Platforms
ABBV vs JNJAbbVie Inc. vs Johnson & Johnson
AMGN vs LLYAmgen Inc. vs Eli Lilly and Company
OXY vs CVXOccidental Petroleum Corporation vs Chevron Corporation
DIS vs WBDThe Walt Disney Company vs Warner Bros. Discovery
PYPL vs VPayPal Holdings vs Visa Inc.
GOOGL vs AAPLAlphabet Inc. (Google) vs Apple Inc.
ANET vs CSCOArista Networks vs Cisco Systems