XLE vs IEO Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR) provides broad S&P 500 energy exposure dominated by integrated oil majors ExxonMobil and Chevron at ultra-low cost, while IEO concentrates purely in upstream oil and gas exploration & production companies with higher oil price sensitivity. XLE is the standard energy sector allocation with lower volatility; IEO is the higher-beta pure play on oil price movements.
XLE vs IEO is integrated oil major stability (ExxonMobil and Chevron's diversified operations plus oil services and refining in one cheap ETF) versus pure upstream oil price leverage (E&P companies with maximum commodity sensitivity at higher cost) — defensive energy allocation versus cyclical commodity play.
XLE holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. IEO has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+49.51% vs +45.02% for XLE).
- Want broad energy sector exposure at ultra-low cost (0.09%) dominated by the largest, most financially stable integrated oil majors that maintained dividends through low-oil price cycles
- Value the sector diversification within energy — integrated majors, E&P, oil services, and refining provide broader energy cycle coverage than pure upstream exposure
- Use XLE for sector rotation or defensive positioning — the integrated major weighting provides more financial stability than concentrated E&P exposure during oil price downturns
- Want pure upstream oil and gas price leverage — E&P companies with the highest earnings sensitivity to crude oil and natural gas price increases in a bull commodity cycle
- Value U.S. shale production growth from EOG Resources, ConocoPhillips, and Devon as a specific investment thesis on efficient U.S. shale operators
- Accept higher volatility and higher cost (0.40%) in exchange for more direct oil price exposure without the dilution of refining, chemicals, and oil services in integrated oil major-dominated XLE
| Metric | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 27.6 | 27.8 |
| Latest closei | $61.63 | $130.07 |
| 1M returni | -3.33% | -6.88% |
| 3M returni | +6.60% | +8.92% |
| 6M returni | +11.61% | +15.07% |
| 1Y returni | +45.02% | +49.51% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.92K (+49.2%) started 2025-11-05 | $15.25K (+52.5%) started 2025-11-05 |
| 5Y ago | $30.22K (+202.2%) started 2021-11-08 | $26.4K (+164.0%) started 2021-11-08 |
| 10Y ago | $44K (+340.0%) started 2016-11-07 | $37.71K (+277.1%) started 2016-11-07 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.08% | 0.37% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $46.37B | $936.86M |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.18% | 1.45% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 15.39 | 10.91 |
| Betai | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| 52-week change | 45.02% | 49.51% |
| Metric | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +45.02% | +49.51% |
| 6M returni | +11.61% | +15.07% |
| 3M returni | +6.60% | +8.92% |
| 1M returni | -3.33% | -6.88% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.53 | 1.41 |
| Betai | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.18% | 1.45% |
| 5Y CAGR | +20.15% | +17.78% |
Over the past year, XLE and IEO have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.95), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +45.02% | +49.51% |
| CAGRi | +45.05% | +49.55% | |
| Volatilityi | 23.30% | 28.26% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.53 | 1.41 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 2.19 | 2.01 | |
| Max drawdowni | 14.98% | 16.32% | |
| Current drawdowni | 11.98% | 15.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 3.90% | 4.60% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 5.63% | 6.46% | |
| Max daily dropi | 4.74% | 6.30% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 10.30% | 11.85% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +149.96% | +126.33% |
| CAGRi | +20.15% | +17.78% | |
| Volatilityi | 25.67% | 30.16% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.67 | 0.55 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.93 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdowni | 26.04% | 31.46% | |
| Current drawdowni | 11.98% | 15.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 6.85% | 10.90% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 8.49% | 12.94% | |
| Max daily dropi | 9.20% | 10.19% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 18.68% | 21.34% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +167.23% | +184.78% |
| CAGRi | +10.34% | +11.04% | |
| Volatilityi | 29.69% | 35.05% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.33 | 0.35 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.46 | 0.49 | |
| Max drawdowni | 66.81% | 74.99% | |
| Current drawdowni | 11.98% | 15.03% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 13.96% | 18.79% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 19.30% | 24.61% | |
| Max daily dropi | 20.14% | 25.92% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 34.55% | 42.49% |
| Category | XLE | IEO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.08% | 0.37% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $46.37B | $936.86M |
| Dividend yieldi | 2.18% | 1.45% |
- Concentrated in the largest, most financially stable energy companies — ExxonMobil and Chevron have investment-grade balance sheets and maintained dividends through low-oil price cycles that stressed smaller producers
- Low cost (0.09%) and high liquidity make XLE the primary institutional tool for energy sector allocation in U.S. equity portfolios
- Integrated oil major structure (XOM, CVX) provides internal diversification — upstream production, refining, chemicals, and midstream operations reduce single-commodity exposure versus pure E&P
- Pure upstream oil price leverage — E&P companies' earnings are most directly tied to crude oil and natural gas prices, providing maximum commodity upside in energy bull cycles
- U.S. shale producers in IEO (EOG, ConocoPhillips, Devon) have improved cost structures through the shale revolution — breakeven prices have fallen significantly, making U.S. E&P companies profitable at lower oil prices than historical levels
- No integration overhead — IEO avoids the capital allocation decisions, refining cycle, and chemical business complexity of integrated oil majors
- ExxonMobil and Chevron alone often represent 40%+ of XLE — concentration in two stocks means XLE performance is heavily determined by these two companies
- Oil services and refining diversification means XLE has slightly lower pure oil price beta than pure E&P ETFs — investors wanting maximum oil price exposure should consider E&P-focused ETFs
- Energy transition risk — oil majors are beginning to invest in renewables but remain predominantly fossil fuel businesses subject to long-term secular transition risk
- Higher commodity price risk — E&P companies are more vulnerable in oil price downturns than integrated oil majors with diversified downstream revenue streams
- Higher expense ratio (0.40%) versus XLE's 0.09% — the concentrated E&P focus costs more per year in management fees
- Natural gas price exposure — U.S. shale E&P companies produce both oil and natural gas; natural gas price cycles (now partly linked to LNG export demand) add a second commodity risk factor
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on XLE and IEO. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside XLE and IEO, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.