MKL vs WRB Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Markel and W.R. Berkley both operate specialty insurance businesses with disciplined underwriting cultures, but Markel has evolved into a broader diversified holding company with owned operating businesses and a public equity portfolio, while W.R. Berkley remains more focused on its decentralized specialty and commercial insurance underwriting operations.
MKL offers exposure to a diversified holding company model combining insurance with owned businesses and equity investing, while WRB offers more focused exposure to disciplined specialty insurance underwriting. The decision depends on whether you prefer a diversified holding company structure or a more purely focused specialty insurer.
WRB holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. WRB leads on both 1-year return (-2.07%) and forward P/E quality (14.28x vs 16.08x for MKL), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. MKL leads on both revenue growth (12.70%) and operating margin (30.09%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for MKL (+7.72%) than for WRB (+0.56%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to a diversified holding company combining specialty insurance with owned operating businesses
- Value an investment approach drawing on long-term value investing principles
- Are comfortable with the complexity of valuing a multi-business holding company
- Believe long-term book value compounding is a meaningful measure of company performance
- Prefer a more focused specialty and commercial insurance underwriting business
- Value a decentralized operating model that responds quickly to niche market opportunities
- Want a company with a long track record of disciplined combined ratio performance
- Prefer a simpler business model to evaluate than a diversified holding company
| Metric | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 42.0 | 48.5 |
| AI ranki | #979 | #615 |
| Latest closei | $1,791.98 | $71.28 |
| 1M returni | -2.99% | +1.09% |
| 6M returni | -8.89% | +3.53% |
| 1Y returni | -6.97% | -2.07% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $9.35K (-6.5%) started 2025-09-16 | $9.98K (-0.2%) started 2025-09-16 |
| 5Y ago | $14.7K (+47.0%) started 2021-09-16 | $26.24K (+162.4%) started 2021-09-17 |
| 10Y ago | $19.58K (+95.8%) started 2016-09-16 | $62.27K (+522.7%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $22.5B | $25.67B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 10.02 | 14.23 |
| Forward P/Ei | 16.08 | 14.28 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | 2.02 |
| EV/Revenuei | 1.29 | 1.75 |
| Analyst targeti | $1,956.33 | $69.53 |
| Target upsidei | +7.72% | +0.56% |
| Metric | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 12.70% | 1.20% |
| Earnings growthi | 86.80% | 15.00% |
| EPS growthi | +86.80% | +15.00% |
| FCF margini | -10.33% | +20.44% |
| Operating margini | 30.09% | 16.39% |
| Profit margini | 13.77% | 12.94% |
| ROIC proxyi | 12.46% | 20.21% |
| Return on equityi | 12.46% | 20.21% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | 0.58% |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 7.61% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | No increase yet |
| Betai | 0.66 | 0.28 |
| Debt/equityi | 22.43 | 31.53 |
| Current ratioi | 3.15 | 0.41 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.03 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, MKL and WRB have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.44), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | -6.53% | -0.20% |
| CAGRi | -6.54% | -0.20% | |
| Volatilityi | 19.51% | 22.04% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | -0.48 | -0.10 | |
| Sortino ratioi | -0.63 | -0.14 | |
| Max drawdowni | 20.10% | 19.02% | |
| Current drawdowni | 18.25% | 9.15% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.92% | 10.08% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.97% | 11.22% | |
| Max daily dropi | 7.85% | 6.06% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 9.51% | 14.12% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +47.03% | +141.19% |
| CAGRi | +8.02% | +19.27% | |
| Volatilityi | 22.45% | 22.85% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.26 | 0.69 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.36 | 0.97 | |
| Max drawdowni | 28.87% | 26.29% | |
| Current drawdowni | 18.25% | 9.15% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.20% | 7.56% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 10.06% | 9.82% | |
| Max daily dropi | 12.82% | 9.22% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 10.94% | 14.12% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +95.76% | +407.80% |
| CAGRi | +6.95% | +17.66% | |
| Volatilityi | 25.36% | 24.63% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.22 | 0.60 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.30 | 0.85 | |
| Max drawdowni | 44.66% | 45.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 18.25% | 9.15% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 9.31% | 7.48% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 12.32% | 10.70% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.83% | 15.43% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 27.11% | 22.83% |
| Category | MKL | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Markel Group Inc. | W. R. Berkley Corporation |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Core business | A diversified holding company built around a specialty insurance and reinsurance business, alongside a growing portfolio of wholly owned non-insurance operating businesses and a public equity investment portfolio. | A specialty property and casualty insurance holding company operating through a decentralized network of insurance business units, each focused on niche commercial insurance and reinsurance markets. |
| Investor focus | Specialty insurance underwriting profitability, investment portfolio performance across both public equities and owned operating businesses, and long-term book value per share growth. | Combined ratio trends across its decentralized specialty insurance units, premium growth in niche commercial lines, and investment income contribution to overall earnings. |
- Diversified holding company structure combining specialty insurance with owned operating businesses provides multiple avenues for long-term value creation
- Long track record of disciplined underwriting in specialty and niche insurance lines has historically supported profitable growth
- Investment approach drawing inspiration from well-known long-term value investing philosophy has aimed to compound capital over time
- Decentralized operating model allows individual specialty insurance units to respond quickly to niche market opportunities
- Long track record of disciplined underwriting has historically supported consistent combined ratio performance relative to industry peers
- Diversification across many niche specialty insurance lines reduces reliance on any single commercial insurance market segment
- Complex holding company structure spanning insurance, investments, and diverse operating businesses can make the company harder for investors to value using simple metrics
- Specialty insurance underwriting results can be volatile in years with significant catastrophe losses
- Public equity investment portfolio performance introduces market-related earnings volatility beyond core insurance operations
- Specialty and commercial insurance underwriting results can be volatile in years with significant catastrophe losses
- Decentralized structure requires strong risk management oversight to maintain underwriting discipline across many individual business units
- Interest rate environment affects investment income generated from the company's fixed income investment portfolio
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.