FTNT vs S Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
FTNT and S both sell cybersecurity but are almost opposite investment profiles. Fortinet is a profitable network security company with a hardware-anchored advantage, large installed base, strong margins, and slower growth complicated by refresh cycles. SentinelOne is a faster-growing, unprofitable endpoint security challenger fighting for share against larger rivals. Profitability and cash flow against growth and competitive risk.
Use this FTNT vs S comparison to weigh an established cash machine against a share challenger. Fortinet's issue is growth and the lumpiness of hardware cycles, not viability. SentinelOne's issue is whether it can reach durable profitability while competing against both the endpoint leader and Microsoft's bundled offering.
FTNT holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. FTNT has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+107.49% vs +23.03%), though S has the better forward P/E setup (42.15x vs 44.15x for FTNT). FTNT leads on both revenue growth (25.60%) and operating margin (33.60%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for S (+22.69%) than for FTNT (-3.09%).
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want profitable cybersecurity exposure with strong margins and free cash flow
- Value the custom chip price-performance advantage in firewalls
- Prefer a large installed base generating recurring service revenue
- Accept slower growth and lumpy hardware refresh cycles
- Want faster-growing endpoint security exposure from a smaller base
- Believe autonomous detection and response will win share over time
- Accept that the company is not yet consistently profitable
- Can tolerate volatility from competitive pressure and pricing
| Metric | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 72.9 | 25.8 |
| AI ranki | #28 | #2611 |
| Latest closei | $173.46 | $22.38 |
| 1M returni | +10.11% | +9.12% |
| 6M returni | +121.82% | +77.90% |
| 1Y returni | +107.49% | +23.03% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $20.85K (+108.5%) started 2025-09-25 | $12.34K (+23.4%) started 2025-09-25 |
| 5Y ago | $28.86K (+188.6%) started 2021-09-27 | $3.92K (-60.8%) started 2021-09-27 |
| 10Y ago | $240.05K (+2300.5%) started 2016-09-26 | $5.27K (-47.3%) started 2021-06-30 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $121.8B | $6.85B |
| Trailing P/Ei | 58.87 | N/A |
| Forward P/Ei | 44.15 | 42.15 |
| Price/Salesi | 13.08 | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 15.71 | 5.82 |
| Analyst targeti | $160.86 | $24.15 |
| Target upsidei | -3.09% | +22.69% |
| Metric | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 25.60% | 20.60% |
| Earnings growthi | 43.90% | N/A |
| EPS growthi | +43.90% | N/A |
| FCF margini | +30.10% | +27.06% |
| Operating margini | 33.60% | -21.57% |
| Profit margini | 28.17% | -30.95% |
| ROIC proxyi | 117.44% | -23.01% |
| Return on equityi | 117.44% | -23.01% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 1.06 | 0.75 |
| Debt/equityi | 36.19 | N/A |
| Current ratioi | 1.28 | 1.45 |
| Quick ratioi | 1.14 | 1.27 |
Over the past year, FTNT and S have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.60), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +108.46% | +23.37% |
| CAGRi | +108.68% | +23.41% | |
| Volatilityi | 42.32% | 52.88% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 1.84 | 0.58 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 3.25 | 0.83 | |
| Max drawdowni | 14.34% | 34.21% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.95% | 7.14% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 4.94% | 13.74% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 6.21% | 16.47% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.34% | 14.44% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.64% | 13.04% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +188.55% | -60.81% |
| CAGRi | +23.63% | -17.10% | |
| Volatilityi | 44.69% | 63.03% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.60 | -0.05 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.85 | -0.07 | |
| Max drawdowni | 38.32% | 84.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.95% | 70.67% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 17.15% | 69.32% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 20.44% | 71.13% | |
| Max daily dropi | 25.07% | 35.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.08% | 40.12% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +2300.50% | -47.34% |
| CAGRi | +37.43% | -11.53% | |
| Volatilityi | 41.19% | 63.58% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.87 | 0.06 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.26 | 0.08 | |
| Max drawdowni | 38.32% | 84.35% | |
| Current drawdowni | 2.95% | 70.67% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 12.57% | 66.69% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 16.46% | 69.54% | |
| Max daily dropi | 25.07% | 35.14% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 27.11% | 40.12% |
| Category | FTNT | S |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Fortinet, Inc. | SentinelOne, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Core business | Network security company best known for its firewalls, built around custom security processing chips that deliver strong performance per dollar. Expanding into secure access service edge, security operations, and cloud security offerings. | Provider of an AI-driven endpoint and extended detection and response platform, with data analytics and automated response capabilities, competing for endpoint security budgets against larger incumbents. |
| Investor focus | Product revenue and firewall refresh cycles, service revenue growth, secure access and security operations billings, and margin performance. | Annual recurring revenue growth, net retention, gross margin improvement, path to profitability, and win rates against larger competitors. |
- Custom security chips give a genuine price-performance advantage in firewalls
- Highly profitable with strong operating margins and free cash flow
- Large installed base creates recurring service revenue and refresh opportunities
- Autonomous detection and response approach appeals to teams wanting less manual triage
- Growing faster than mature network security vendors from a smaller base
- Often competes on price against the endpoint market leader, which wins deals in cost-conscious accounts
- Hardware refresh cycles make product revenue lumpy and hard to forecast
- Network security growth is slower than cloud-native security categories
- Competing against cloud-delivered security models that de-emphasise appliances
- Not consistently profitable, so growth is funded rather than self-sustaining
- Competes directly against a larger, better-resourced endpoint leader and against Microsoft bundling
- Discount-led competition can win deals while compressing margins
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on FTNT and S. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside FTNT and S, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Full valuation workup with AI Score, Monte Carlo forecast, and bull/bear case — free preview, premium data from $3.99.