TENB vs RPD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Tenable and Rapid7 both compete in the vulnerability and exposure management market, but Tenable has built its franchise around a long-standing vulnerability management leadership position now expanding into cloud security, while Rapid7 combines vulnerability management with a broader unified detection and response platform.
TENB offers exposure to an established vulnerability management leader expanding into cloud security and exposure management, while RPD offers exposure to a unified platform combining exposure management with detection and response. The decision depends on whether you prefer a focused exposure management leader or a broader security operations platform.
TENB holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. TENB has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+48.53% vs -21.19%), though RPD has the better forward P/E setup (5.45x vs 15.67x for TENB). TENB leads on both revenue growth (8.60%) and operating margin (4.85%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +3.24% for TENB and +5.78% for RPD.
Human Wall Street analysts' price targets, typically implying a ~12-month view — a separate signal from this site's own AI Prediction Signal further down the page, which is a 5-/30-day machine-learning forecast based on price history alone.
- Want exposure to an established vulnerability and exposure management leader
- Value a company with a large, established customer base for cross-selling newer products
- Believe expansion into cloud security will continue supporting growth
- Prefer a more focused exposure management vendor over a broader security operations platform
- Want exposure to a unified platform combining vulnerability management with detection and response
- Value a diversified security product portfolio spanning multiple categories
- Believe managed detection and response offerings will continue attracting customers seeking outsourced support
- Are comfortable with a company still working toward sustained profitability
| Metric | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|
| AI scorei | 31.9 | 25.2 |
| AI ranki | #2127 | #3071 |
| Latest closei | $44.59 | $14.91 |
| 1M returni | +23.07% | +13.90% |
| 3M returni | +38.26% | +57.11% |
| 6M returni | +122.73% | +150.59% |
| 1Y returni | +48.53% | -21.19% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.85K (+48.5%) started 2025-10-23 | $7.88K (-21.2%) started 2025-10-23 |
| 5Y ago | $8.42K (-15.8%) started 2021-10-25 | $1.17K (-88.3%) started 2021-10-25 |
| 10Y ago | $14.74K (+47.4%) started 2018-07-26 | $9.7K (-3.0%) started 2016-10-24 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|
| Market capi | $3.77B | $746.13M |
| Trailing P/Ei | 570.67 | 35.71 |
| Forward P/Ei | 15.67 | 5.45 |
| Price/Salesi | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenuei | 3.86 | 1.17 |
| Analyst targeti | $35.35 | $11.71 |
| Target upsidei | +3.24% | +5.78% |
| Metric | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthi | 8.60% | -1.50% |
| Earnings growthi | N/A | -30.40% |
| EPS growthi | N/A | -30.40% |
| FCF margini | +24.61% | +15.57% |
| Operating margini | 4.85% | 2.27% |
| Profit margini | 0.65% | 2.35% |
| ROIC proxyi | 2.46% | 14.03% |
| Return on equityi | 2.46% | 14.03% |
| Dividend yieldi | N/A | N/A |
| Payout ratioi | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend growth streaki | N/A | N/A |
| Betai | 0.94 | 0.96 |
| Debt/equityi | 212.48 | 488.88 |
| Current ratioi | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| Quick ratioi | 0.65 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, TENB and RPD have moved moderately in the same direction (correlation of 0.66), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +48.53% | -21.19% |
| CAGRi | +48.57% | -21.21% | |
| Volatilityi | 60.39% | 80.62% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.88 | 0.06 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.37 | 0.08 | |
| Max drawdowni | 47.15% | 73.67% | |
| Current drawdowni | 0.00% | 22.26% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 19.94% | 44.41% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 23.03% | 48.41% | |
| Max daily dropi | 11.85% | 28.97% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 22.17% | 34.29% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | -15.84% | -88.28% |
| CAGRi | -3.39% | -34.90% | |
| Volatilityi | 47.84% | 58.55% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.07 | -0.52 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.10 | -0.72 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.40% | 96.40% | |
| Current drawdowni | 28.84% | 89.36% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 36.35% | 69.20% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 39.62% | 72.25% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.14% | 28.97% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 26.04% | 40.80% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +47.40% | -2.99% |
| CAGRi | +4.82% | -0.30% | |
| Volatilityi | 49.25% | 51.17% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.25 | 0.16 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.36 | 0.23 | |
| Max drawdowni | 74.40% | 96.40% | |
| Current drawdowni | 28.84% | 89.36% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 31.55% | 39.52% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 35.21% | 51.94% | |
| Max daily dropi | 19.14% | 28.97% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 27.32% | 40.80% |
| Category | TENB | RPD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Tenable Holdings, Inc. | Rapid7, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Core business | A cybersecurity company providing vulnerability management and exposure management solutions that help organizations identify, prioritize, and remediate security weaknesses across IT, cloud, and operational technology environments. | A cybersecurity company offering a unified security operations platform combining vulnerability management, detection and response, and cloud security to help organizations manage risk and respond to threats. |
| Investor focus | Growth in cloud security and exposure management annual recurring revenue, calculated current billings trends, and cross-sell of newer products into its established vulnerability management customer base. | Annual recurring revenue growth across its detection and response and cloud security offerings, net revenue retention trends, and progress toward sustained profitability. |
- Long-standing leadership position in vulnerability management provides a large, established customer base for cross-selling newer products
- Expansion into cloud security and unified exposure management addresses a broadening set of enterprise attack surface concerns
- Coverage spanning IT, cloud, and operational technology environments differentiates the platform from narrower point solutions
- Unified platform combining vulnerability management with detection and response addresses both proactive and reactive security needs
- Managed detection and response offerings provide an avenue for customers seeking outsourced security operations support
- Diversified product portfolio spanning exposure management and threat detection creates multiple avenues for account expansion
- Faces competition from both established vulnerability management peers and newer cloud-native security posture vendors
- Growth in adjacent categories like cloud security must scale meaningfully to offset maturation in its core vulnerability management business
- Enterprise security budgets can face scrutiny during economic uncertainty, affecting the pace of new deal closures
- Faces intense competition from a broad range of vulnerability management, cloud security, and detection and response vendors
- Achieving sustained profitability alongside continued growth investment remains an ongoing balancing act
- Net revenue retention trends require sustained improvement to support long-term growth expectations
Compare more than two at a time
This page is a fixed writeup on TENB and RPD. Our comparison engine is the interactive version: load up to five tickers, switch timeframes, and get the correlation, drawdown, and overlap analysis that a static page can't show.
Add three more names beside TENB and RPD, mixing stocks and ETFs in the same table — useful when the real question is which of a whole peer group to own.
AI score, forward P/E, analyst target upside, operating margin, and revenue growth are scored head-to-head, with a running tally of which ticker leads on how many metrics.
Volatility, Sharpe and Sortino ratios, maximum, current, and average drawdown, Ulcer Index, and worst single-day and single-week drops across every timeframe.
Pairwise daily-return correlation for every combination, so you can see whether two holdings actually diversify each other or just move together.
A scatter plot of forward P/E against return on equity, plus drawdown and 30-day rolling volatility charts, to separate what is cheap from what is merely beaten down.
For ETFs, a top-holdings comparison that exposes hidden overlap between funds. Every comparison exports to CSV for your own spreadsheet work.
Two comparisons a week are free without an account. A 14-day trial removes the limit and adds AI price forecasts, stock rankings, saved watchlists, and the intrinsic value calculator — no credit card required.
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.