LPLA vs RJF: LPL Financial vs Raymond James Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
LPL Financial is a pure independent advisor platform, while Raymond James is a hybrid wealth management company with both employee and independent advisors, an investment banking business, and a banking subsidiary. LPL is the cleaner independent advisor bet; Raymond James is more diversified with investment banking and banking income.
LPLA vs RJF is the pure independent advisor platform versus hybrid wealth manager with investment banking — LPL wins if wirehouse-to-independent transitions sustain advisor recruitment; Raymond James wins if investment banking revenue recovers alongside advisor asset growth and bank NII.
LPLA holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RJF has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+5.42% vs -12.95%), though LPLA has the better forward P/E setup (10.97x vs 11.91x for RJF). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for LPLA (+28.76%) than for RJF (+8.65%).
- →want the purest play on the secular wirehouse-to-independent advisor transition
- →value LPL's technology platform scale as the dominant independent broker-dealer
- →prefer advisory fee revenue compounding with advisor AUA over investment banking cyclicality
- →are comfortable with sweep cash rate sensitivity in exchange for advisor platform growth
- →prefer a hybrid wealth manager with both employee and independent advisors providing flexibility
- →value Raymond James Bank as a NII-generating subsidiary that diversifies revenue from pure brokerage
- →want investment banking upside alongside wealth management in a single financial services company
- →prefer a more diversified financial services model over LPL's pure independent advisor platform focus
| Metric | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 63.0 | 52.8 |
| AI rank | #89 | #355 |
| Latest close | $321.32 | $166.98 |
| 1M return | +8.68% | +8.15% |
| 6M return | -11.88% | -0.44% |
| 1Y return | -12.95% | +5.42% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.74K (-12.6%) started 2025-07-14 | $10.48K (+4.8%) started 2025-07-14 |
| 5Y ago | $24.97K (+149.7%) started 2021-07-14 | $21.34K (+113.4%) started 2021-07-14 |
| 10Y ago | $167.73K (+1577.3%) started 2016-07-14 | $62.74K (+527.4%) started 2016-07-14 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $25.7B | $32.76B |
| Trailing P/E | 28.92 | 15.88 |
| Forward P/E | 10.97 | 11.91 |
| Price/Sales | 1.44 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 1.71 | 1.49 |
| Analyst target | $413.71 | $182.67 |
| Target upside | +28.76% | +8.65% |
| Metric | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 35.00% | 13.10% |
| Earnings growth | 4.50% | 15.30% |
| EPS growth | +4.50% | +15.30% |
| FCF margin | N/A | N/A |
| Operating margin | N/A | 19.32% |
| Profit margin | 5.05% | 14.58% |
| ROIC proxy | 20.45% | 17.29% |
| Return on equity | 20.45% | 17.29% |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 1.28% |
| Beta | 0.51 | 0.94 |
| Debt/equity | 132.28 | 48.48 |
| Current ratio | 2.45 | 2.29 |
| Quick ratio | 2.38 | 2.28 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -12.95% | +4.81% |
| CAGR | -12.96% | +4.84% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.31 | 0.14 | |
| Max drawdown | 33.12% | 20.14% | |
| Max daily drop | 8.31% | 8.75% | |
| Max wkly drop | 18.07% | 9.01% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +143.73% | +101.70% |
| CAGR | +19.51% | +15.07% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.55 | 0.48 | |
| Max drawdown | 33.18% | 32.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.35% | 8.75% | |
| Max wkly drop | 22.67% | 18.18% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +1397.23% | +446.51% |
| CAGR | +31.08% | +18.52% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.79 | 0.56 | |
| Max drawdown | 60.34% | 45.59% | |
| Max daily drop | 21.73% | 11.59% | |
| Max wkly drop | 32.37% | 25.33% |
| Category | LPLA | RJF |
|---|---|---|
| Company | LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | Raymond James Financial, Inc. |
| Sector | Financials | Financial Services |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Largest independent broker-dealer providing technology and compliance services to 23,000+ independent advisors. LPL does not employ advisors directly — advisors run independent practices on LPL's platform. | Full-service wealth management company with an employee advisor channel (Raymond James & Associates), independent advisor channel (Raymond James Financial Services), and investment banking (Capital Markets). Raymond James employs about half its advisors directly. |
| Investor focus | Net new advisor assets, recruitment pipeline, ARPU per advisor, and capital return. | Advisor-driven client asset growth, NII from banking subsidiary, capital markets revenue, and advisor retention through economic cycles. |
- →Dominant independent advisor platform with the largest independent advisor count in the US
- →Structural tailwind from wirehouse-to-independent transition as advisors value practice ownership
- →Advisory fee revenue compounds as advisors grow their AUA within LPL's platform
- →Hybrid model of employee and independent advisors provides flexibility to attract different advisor types
- →Raymond James Bank subsidiary generates NII on client deposits and loans — a significant earnings diversifier vs pure broker-dealers
- →Investment banking and capital markets provide cyclical upside in strong M&A and equity issuance environments
- →LPL does not control advisor quality — advisor misconduct can create reputational and regulatory risk
- →Advisor portability means top LPL advisors can switch to competitor platforms (Fidelity, Ameritas)
- →NII from client cash sweep is rate-sensitive — lower rates reduce LPL's spread on advisor client cash
- →Investment banking revenue is cyclical and compresses earnings in slow deal market environments
- →Raymond James Bank NII is sensitive to interest rates and credit quality in its loan portfolio
- →Advisor retention requires competitive payout rates that limit profitability improvement per advisor
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.