FDVV vs SCHD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
FDVV and SCHD are both dividend ETFs with quality screens but different emphasis. FDVV prioritizes higher current yield (3.5-4.5%) with international diversification at 0.15%. SCHD prioritizes dividend quality and growth (10+ consecutive payment years, strict quality factors) at 0.06% — the cheapest major dividend ETF. Over long horizons, SCHD's dividend growth compounds income faster; in the near term, FDVV provides more current income.
FDVV vs SCHD — Fidelity High Dividend ETF (higher-yield US and international dividend stocks at 0.15%, prioritizing current income with quality screens) versus Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (100 highest-quality US dividend payers with 10+ consecutive payment years, strict quality factors, and 10-15% annual dividend growth at 0.06%).
SCHD holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. SCHD has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+31.89% vs +22.41% for FDVV).
- →want maximum near-term dividend income — FDVV's higher yield provides more immediate cash flow than SCHD's quality-focused lower starting yield
- →value international dividend diversification — FDVV's global approach adds geographic diversification absent from SCHD's US-only portfolio
- →are comfortable with slightly looser quality screening in exchange for higher current yield and 0.15% competitive expense ratio
- →have shorter investment horizons where near-term income exceeds the compounding benefit of SCHD's dividend growth
- →prioritize dividend quality and growth over near-term yield — SCHD's strict screening minimizes dividend cut risk and 10-15% annual dividend growth builds income substantially over time
- →are long-term investors where SCHD's income on original cost basis dramatically exceeds FDVV's after 10+ years of dividend growth compounding
- →value the 0.06% expense ratio — one of the absolute cheapest ETFs available, maximizing the percentage of dividend income retained by investors
- →want US-focused dividend exposure from established quality companies without currency or international regulatory risk
| Metric | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 72.0 | 85.0 |
| Latest close | $63.01 | $33.56 |
| 1M return | +2.82% | +3.61% |
| 6M return | +10.18% | +14.40% |
| 1Y return | +22.41% | +31.89% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.48K (+24.8%) started 2025-08-04 | $13.56K (+35.6%) started 2025-08-04 |
| 5Y ago | $23.32K (+133.2%) started 2021-08-03 | $19.02K (+90.2%) started 2021-08-03 |
| 10Y ago | $53.82K (+438.2%) started 2016-09-15 | $49.48K (+394.8%) started 2016-08-03 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $9.74B | $95.73B |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 3.30% |
| Trailing P/E | 20.13 | 19.36 |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.70 |
| 52-week change | 22.41% | 31.89% |
| Metric | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +22.41% | +31.89% |
| 6M return | +10.18% | +14.40% |
| 1M return | +2.82% | +3.61% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.70 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 3.30% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.24% | +9.38% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +20.99% | +30.75% |
| CAGR | +21.07% | +30.87% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.48 | 2.10 | |
| Max drawdown | 9.30% | 4.61% | |
| Max daily drop | 1.80% | 1.84% | |
| Max wkly drop | 2.76% | 3.17% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +94.53% | +56.56% |
| CAGR | +14.24% | +9.38% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.68 | 0.39 | |
| Max drawdown | 20.18% | 16.84% | |
| Max daily drop | 5.81% | 5.42% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.08% | 12.74% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +254.95% | +233.00% |
| CAGR | +13.68% | +12.79% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.58 | 0.54 | |
| Max drawdown | 40.25% | 33.37% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.23% | 9.95% | |
| Max wkly drop | 22.29% | 18.00% |
| Category | FDVV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Fidelity High Dividend ETF | Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $9.74B | $95.73B |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 3.30% |
- →Higher dividend yield than SCHD: FDVV's yield emphasis typically delivers 3.5-4.5% vs SCHD's 3-4% — providing more current income for income-first investors
- →International diversification: FDVV includes international stocks unlike SCHD's US-only focus — broader geographic diversification
- →0.15% expense ratio with quality screening: very competitive for an actively-screened high dividend ETF
- →Strictest quality screening of any major dividend ETF: 10+ consecutive dividend years + quality factor screening eliminates dividend cutters — SCHD has extremely low historical dividend cut rate among holdings
- →Highest dividend growth rate among major dividend ETFs: SCHD's quality holdings grow dividends 10-15% annually — income on original cost basis grows dramatically over 10+ years
- →0.06% expense ratio: SCHD is one of the cheapest ETFs available — almost no fee drag on long-term compounding
- →Less rigorous quality screening than SCHD: FDVV's yield emphasis may result in holding some lower-quality companies that SCHD's stricter quality filters exclude
- →Lower dividend growth rate than SCHD: high-yield companies tend to grow dividends more slowly than dividend growth companies — FDVV's income may grow slower over time
- →International currency and regulatory risk: FDVV's international holdings add foreign currency fluctuation and non-US regulatory risks
- →US-only exposure: SCHD holds only US stocks — no international diversification vs FDVV's global approach
- →Lower current yield than FDVV: SCHD's emphasis on quality and growth over yield means slightly lower near-term yield (3-4%) vs FDVV's yield-focused higher income
- →Large-cap value tilt may lag in technology-led bull markets: SCHD's quality screening favors established dividend payers — less technology sector exposure means relative underperformance in strong tech-led rallies
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.