PODD vs TNDM Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
PODD (Insulet/Omnipod) and TNDM (Tandem) are the two leading independent insulin pump companies competing directly for patients requiring automated insulin delivery. Omnipod's tubeless patch pump convenience advantage has driven international growth, while Tandem's Control-IQ clinical performance has sustained U.S. market share, with both companies now competing directly as Tandem's Mobi enters the tubeless market.
PODD vs TNDM is the direct insulin pump company comparison — Insulet's tubeless patch pump global leader against Tandem's algorithmically superior but tubed-pump-centric competitor expanding into patch pump territory.
PODD and TNDM are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. TNDM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-25.02% vs -51.70%), though PODD trades at the lower forward P/E (18.04x vs 260.20x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for TNDM (+90.85%) than for PODD (+66.32%).
- →Want the tubeless insulin patch pump leader with differentiated patient convenience and strong international market expansion
- →Value Omnipod's form factor preference among pediatric and active adult users as a durable competitive advantage
- →See Omnipod 5 AID as maintaining competitive parity with Tandem in closed-loop control while retaining the tubeless design advantage
- →Want insulin pump exposure with superior AID algorithm clinical outcomes and software-update differentiation
- →See Mobi launch as a strategic move to compete in the tubeless market and expand Tandem's addressable patient population
- →Value Tandem's physician relationships built on Control-IQ clinical performance as providing a foundation for future algorithm improvements
| Metric | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 47.0 | 24.9 |
| AI rank | #634 | #2940 |
| Latest close | $145.76 | $15.30 |
| 1M return | -5.72% | +10.39% |
| 6M return | -49.66% | -31.76% |
| 1Y return | -51.70% | -25.02% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $4.83K (-51.7%) started 2025-06-18 | $7.5K (-25.0%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $5.2K (-48.0%) started 2021-06-18 | $1.63K (-83.7%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $49.13K (+391.3%) started 2016-06-20 | $2.04K (-79.6%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $10.1B | $1.05B |
| Trailing P/E | 34.06 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 18.04 | 260.20 |
| Price/Sales | 3.48 | 1.02 |
| EV/Revenue | 3.71 | 1.27 |
| Analyst target | $242.43 | $29.20 |
| Target upside | +66.32% | +90.85% |
| Metric | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 33.90% | 5.50% |
| Earnings growth | 159.00% | N/A |
| EPS growth | +159.00% | N/A |
| FCF margin | +8.73% | -1.97% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 10.44% | -9.20% |
| ROIC proxy | 23.00% | -65.73% |
| Return on equity | 23.00% | -65.73% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 1.13 | 1.57 |
| Debt/equity | 77.84 | 554.92 |
| Current ratio | 2.49 | 3.58 |
| Quick ratio | 1.49 | 2.87 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -51.70% | -25.02% |
| CAGR | -51.73% | -25.03% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.83 | -0.04 | |
| Max drawdown | 59.63% | 54.64% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.50% | 19.94% | |
| Max wkly drop | 17.35% | 34.40% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -48.04% | -83.68% |
| CAGR | -12.28% | -30.42% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.20 | -0.26 | |
| Max drawdown | 61.31% | 93.40% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.50% | 35.25% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.54% | 43.11% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +391.27% | -79.63% |
| CAGR | +17.27% | -14.72% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.48 | 0.14 | |
| Max drawdown | 61.31% | 97.44% | |
| Max daily drop | 16.84% | 58.88% | |
| Max wkly drop | 27.93% | 67.77% |
| Category | PODD | TNDM |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Insulet Corporation | Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. |
| Sector | Health Care - Medical Devices / Diabetes Technology | Health Care - Medical Devices / Diabetes Technology |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Insulet develops and markets the Omnipod system — a tubeless, waterproof insulin patch pump worn directly on the body, eliminating the need for traditional tubing. Omnipod 5 integrates with Dexcom CGM for closed-loop automated insulin delivery. | Tandem Diabetes Care develops t:slim X2 insulin pumps with the Control-IQ closed-loop automated insulin delivery (AID) algorithm, integrating with Dexcom CGM to automatically adjust basal insulin delivery, with the Mobi tubeless pump expanding its product offering. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Omnipod pod volume growth, international market expansion, Omnipod 5 AID adoption, revenue per pod, and the company's EBITDA margin improvement as Omnipod scales globally. | Investors track Tandem's new pump shipments, Control-IQ AID clinical outcomes data, Mobi tubeless pump launch against Omnipod competition, and the path toward sustainable profitability. |
- →Tubeless patch pump design is preferred by many patients and parents (pediatric users) over traditional tubed pumps for lifestyle convenience and discretion
- →Omnipod 5 AID integration with Dexcom CGM provides competitive automated insulin delivery in a patch pump form factor
- →Strong international expansion — Omnipod has significant revenue internationally where the patch pump format has been well-received
- →Control-IQ algorithm has demonstrated excellent time-in-range clinical outcomes and is highly regarded by endocrinologists
- →Software over-the-air update capability allows new algorithms to be deployed to existing pumps without hardware replacement
- →Mobi launch addresses the tubeless market segment that Insulet dominates, expanding Tandem's addressable market
- →Traditional tubed pumps (Tandem's t:slim, Medtronic) are competing with AID algorithm improvements that narrow the convenience gap
- →Omnipod pod manufacturing cost reduction is ongoing but achieving the necessary scale to materially improve margins takes time
- →Competitive pressure from Medtronic (MiniMed) and Tandem in the core insulin-dependent diabetes pump market
- →Omnipod's tubeless patch pump preference is strong among users — Mobi enters a market where Insulet has an established brand and workflow advantage
- →Tandem has had significant revenue growth challenges as international expansion dynamics and competition create uncertainty
- →Smaller scale than Insulet and Medtronic limits manufacturing cost advantages and negotiating leverage with distributors
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.