QQQM vs XLK Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
QQQM and XLK both provide concentrated exposure to leading technology companies, but QQQM tracks the broader Nasdaq-100 Index spanning technology, consumer, and healthcare sectors, while XLK tracks specifically the technology sector of the S&P 500 Index.
QQQM offers exposure to a broader basket of large Nasdaq-listed growth companies across multiple sectors, while XLK offers more concentrated, pure-play exposure to the technology sector specifically. The decision depends on whether you prefer broader growth-oriented diversification or a more targeted technology sector bet.
XLK holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. XLK has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+39.30% vs +22.15% for QQQM).
- Want broad exposure to large Nasdaq-listed growth companies across multiple sectors
- Value diversification beyond pure technology into consumer and healthcare names
- Believe continued growth of leading technology and internet-related companies will drive returns
- Prefer a broader growth index fund over a single-sector concentrated fund
- Want concentrated, pure-play exposure to the technology sector specifically
- Value a low-cost way to gain targeted technology sector exposure
- Believe technology sector performance will continue to lead the broader market
- Are comfortable with the lack of diversification from a single-sector focused fund
| Metric | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| ETF scorei | 82.0 | 89.0 |
| Latest closei | $295.20 | $188.06 |
| 1M returni | -0.08% | +1.31% |
| 6M returni | +21.19% | +36.18% |
| 1Y returni | +22.15% | +39.30% |
The ETF score weights long-term returns and risk-adjusted performance most heavily, but still rewards low expense ratios, larger fund size, and broader diversification — so it can favor low-cost, broad, mega-cap funds over smaller thematic or actively-managed funds even when the latter have delivered stronger returns.
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.28K (+22.8%) started 2025-09-17 | $14K (+40.0%) started 2025-09-17 |
| 5Y ago | $20.47K (+104.7%) started 2021-09-17 | $26.09K (+160.9%) started 2021-09-17 |
| 10Y ago | $26.21K (+162.1%) started 2020-10-13 | $98.19K (+881.9%) started 2016-09-19 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratioi | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $104.38B | $121.44B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.44% | 0.43% |
| Trailing P/Ei | 29.22 | 33.29 |
| Betai | 1.24 | 1.36 |
| 52-week change | 22.15% | 39.30% |
| Metric | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y returni | +22.15% | +39.30% |
| 6M returni | +21.19% | +36.18% |
| 1M returni | -0.08% | +1.31% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.90 | 1.22 |
| Betai | 1.24 | 1.36 |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.44% | 0.43% |
| 5Y CAGR | +14.67% | +20.23% |
Over the past year, QQQM and XLK have moved strongly in the same direction (correlation of 0.96), based on daily returns.
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growthi | +22.15% | +39.30% |
| CAGRi | +22.17% | +39.33% | |
| Volatilityi | 19.56% | 26.40% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.90 | 1.22 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 1.29 | 1.79 | |
| Max drawdowni | 11.96% | 15.92% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.80% | 5.01% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 3.14% | 5.14% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 4.00% | 6.27% | |
| Max daily dropi | 4.78% | 6.66% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 6.75% | 9.99% | |
| 5Y | Growthi | +98.27% | +151.16% |
| CAGRi | +14.67% | +20.23% | |
| Volatilityi | 22.84% | 25.98% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.52 | 0.67 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.74 | 0.97 | |
| Max drawdowni | 35.04% | 33.56% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.80% | 5.01% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 9.15% | 8.59% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 13.56% | 12.23% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.11% | 6.82% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.92% | 13.59% | |
| 10Y | Growthi | +152.74% | +783.07% |
| CAGRi | +16.93% | +24.36% | |
| Volatilityi | 22.21% | 25.01% | |
| Sharpe ratioi | 0.62 | 0.82 | |
| Sortino ratioi | 0.88 | 1.17 | |
| Max drawdowni | 35.04% | 33.56% | |
| Current drawdowni | 3.80% | 5.01% | |
| Avg drawdowni | 8.05% | 6.01% | |
| Ulcer Indexi | 12.51% | 9.62% | |
| Max daily dropi | 6.11% | 13.81% | |
| Max wkly dropi | 11.92% | 17.04% |
| Category | QQQM | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratioi | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Total assets (AUM)i | $104.38B | $121.44B |
| Dividend yieldi | 0.44% | 0.43% |
- Broad exposure to the largest Nasdaq-listed companies provides diversification across technology, consumer, and healthcare sectors beyond pure technology
- Low expense ratio makes it a cost-efficient way to gain exposure to a basket of leading growth-oriented companies
- Historical performance has benefited from the strong growth of its largest technology and internet-related holdings
- Pure-play technology sector exposure provides a more targeted bet on technology sector performance than a broader index fund
- Low expense ratio makes it a cost-efficient way to gain concentrated exposure to large-cap technology companies
- Historical performance has benefited from the strong growth of the technology sector within the broader S&P 500
- Concentration in a relatively small number of mega-cap holdings means performance is heavily influenced by those largest positions
- Exclusion of financial sector companies means the fund does not provide exposure to that segment of the broader market
- Growth-oriented holdings can experience larger drawdowns during periods of rising interest rates or growth stock underperformance
- Concentration in a single sector means the fund lacks the diversification benefits of a broader market or multi-sector index fund
- Technology sector performance can be more volatile than the broader market during periods of sector rotation or rate sensitivity
- Top holdings weighting in a small number of mega-cap companies means performance is heavily influenced by those largest positions
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.